Skip to main content

Pole Estimation for Target Recognition via Late Time Scattering

  • Chapter
Ultra-Wideband, Short-Pulse Electromagnetics 7
  • 1805 Accesses

Abstract

Since the development of the singularity expansion method (SEM), several authors have attempted to identify targets via their SEM parameters. Many of these techniques require estimate of the poles of all modes that contribute significantly to the late time scattered signal. In this paper we describe a new pole estimation algorithm for target recognition. The new algorithm is compared to existing pole estimation algorithms, and estimation results are shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. E. Baum, E. J. Rothwell, K. M. Chen, and D. P. Nyquist, The singularity expansion method and its application to target identification, Proc. IEEE, 79(10), 1481–1492 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. E. M. Kennaugh, The K-pulse concept, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 35(3), 327–331 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Ilavarasan, J. E. Ross, E. J. Rothwell, K.-M. Chen, and D. P Nyquist, Performance of an automated radar target discrimination scheme using E pulses and S pulses, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 41(5), 582–588 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. D. P. Ruiz, A. Gallego, and M. C. Carrion, Scattered signal enhancement algorithm applied to radar target discrimination schemes, IEICE Trans. Commun., E82-B(11), 1858–1866 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. E. Baum, Direct construction of a Xi-pulse from natural frequencies and evaluation of the late-time residuals, Phillips Laboratory Interaction Notes, Note 519, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. W. Brooks and M. W. Maier, Object classification by system identification and feature extraction methods applied to estimation of SEM parameters, in Proceedings of the IEEE National Radar Conference, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 1994, pp. 200–205.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. W. Brooks, M. W. Maier, and S. R. Vechinski, Applying system identification and neural networks to the efficient discrimination of unexploded ordnance, in Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 1997, pp. 449–467.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. J. E. Mooney, Z. Ding, and L. Riggs, Robust target identification using a generalized likelihood ratio test, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Ultra-Wideband, Short-Pulse Electromagnetics, Plenum Press, New York, 1997, pp. 343–350.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. J. Pascoe, W. D. Wood, P. S. Maybeck, and A. W. Wood, Target recognition-via late time scattering, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Ultra-Wideband, Short-Pulse Electromagnetics, Kluwer/Plenum, New York, 2003, pp. 463–470.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. E. Baum, On the singularity expansion method for the solution of electromagnetic interaction problems, Air Force Weapons Laboratory Interaction Notes, Note 88, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. E. Baum in Transient Electromagnetic Fields, L. B. Felsen (ed.), Springer-Verlag, New York, 1976, pp. 129–177.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. K. Sarkar and O. Pereira, Using the matrix pencil method to estimate the parameters of a sum of complex exponentials, IEEE Antennas Propag, Mag., 37(1), 48–55 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Li, K. J. R. Liu, and J. Razavilar, A parameter estimation scheme for damped sinusoidal signals based on low-rank Hankel approximation, IEEE Trans. Signal Proc, 45(2), 481–486 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Lu, D. Wei, B. L. Evans, and A. C. Bovik, Improved matrix pencil methods, in Conference Record of the Thirty-Second Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 1997, pp. 1433–1437.

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. K. Sarkar, S. Park, J. Koh, and S. M. Rao, Application of the matrix pencil method for estimating the SEM (singularity expansion method) poles of source-free transient responses from multiple look directions, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 48(4), 612–618 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Bresler and A. Macovski, Exact maximum likelihood parameter estimation of superimposed exponential signals in noise, IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech Signal Proc., 34(5), 1081–1089(1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P. S. Maybeck, Stochastic Models, Estimation, and Control, vol. 1, Navtech, Arlington, VA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. S. Maybeck, Stochastic Models, Estimation, and Control, vol. II, Navtech, Arlington, VA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Kumaresan and D. W. Tufts, Estimating the poles of exponentially-damped sinusoids and pole-zero modeling in noise, IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech Signal Proc., 30(6), 833–840 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. W. Sun, K.-M. Chen, D. P. Nyquist, and E. J. Rothwell, Determination of the natural modes for a rectangular plate, IEEE Trans Antennas Propag., 38(5), 643–652 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. B. L. Merchant, P. J. Moser, A. Nagl, and H. Uberall, Singularity expansion representations of fields and currents in transient scattering, IEEE Trans Antennas Propag., 32(5), 466–473 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pascoe, K.J., Wood, W.D. (2007). Pole Estimation for Target Recognition via Late Time Scattering. In: Sabath, F., Mokole, E.L., Schenk, U., Nitsch, D. (eds) Ultra-Wideband, Short-Pulse Electromagnetics 7. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-37731-5_74

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics