Skip to main content

Expanding Churchman’s Philosophical Discourse

New Perspectives

  • Chapter
Wisdom, Knowledge, and Management

Part of the book series: C.West Churchman and Related Works Series ((CWCL,volume 2))

  • 836 Accesses

Abstract

Real world problems always present the duality of object and subject and, as a consequence, their management exhibits a particular complexity where analytical tools must take into account purposeful approaches as well as the cultural context in which actions take place. We envisage “beauty” in this sequential contextualization.

These systems require a double control:

A mega-structure, visible in its organizations and authorities, which provide purposes and restrictions.

A meta-structure which provides inquiring systems and their rules of logic. The mega- and meta-structures compete although the meta-structure is in the service of the mega-structure. That’s the order of power.

The mega- and meta-structures are not isomorphic and the meta-structure is not a part of the mega-structure. A meta-structure has to be a subtle and heterogeneous meta-system, with sayings of its own, which has to act on all

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Most important for me has been Churchman, West C., 1971,The Design of Inquiring Systems, Basic Books; and 1968,The Systems Approach, Delta.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Linstone, Harold A., 1994,Multiple Perspectives for Decision Making, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mitroff, Ian I. and Linstone, Harold A., 1993,The Unbounded Mind.

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Gigch, John P., 2003,Metadecisions: Rehabilitating Epistemology, Kluwer/Plenum, London and New York; and 1991,Systems design Modelling and Metamodelling, Plenum, also earlier books.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See for example Gregory, Amanda and Jackson, Mike, 1992, “Evaluation methodologies: A system for use”,J Opl Res Soc,3(1) and Gregory, A., 1996, “The Road to Integration”,Omega,24(3).

    Google Scholar 

  6. The expression grand policy is also used. Dror, Yehezkel, 1986,Policymaking under Adversity, Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eriksson, Darek, 2003, “Identification of normative sources for systems thinking: An inquiry into religious ground-motives for systems thinking paradigms”,Systems Research and Behavioural Science,20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ivanov, Kristo, 2004, “In memory of C. West Churchman (1913–2004)”,Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change,1(2–3).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khakee, Abdul, 2003, “The emerging gap between evaluation research and practice”,Evaluation,9:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Foucault, Michel, 1970,L’ordre du discourse, Collège de France, denies both the existence of an external guarantor and a true essence of a discourse.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miller, James, 1978,Living Systems, Mc Graw-Hill, is a good example of an object view. It is about surviving systems and their dynamics without being explicit about how to use this model in policy analysis or in research.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Agrell, Per Sigurd and Vallée, Robert, 1985, “Different concepts of systems analysis”,Kybernetes,12.

    Google Scholar 

  13. The most celebrated summary of those is surely the Rosenhead, Jonathan, 1989,Rational Analysis for a Problematic World, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  14. In 1991 appeared both the Critical Systems Thinking and the Creative Problem Solving, both by Bob Flood and Mike Jackson, both with Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  15. The reader is invited to add Edmund Husserl’s phenomenological view to this short writing about phenomena especially his thoughts about the intentionality of knowledge which is combined with care for a truth concept. He respects the integrity of our different sciences. His distinction between perceptions and facts is also essential for us here. Husserl, Edmund (1900), Prolegomena zur reinen Logik. Jean-louis le Moigne would be a more modern proponent of intentional phenomenology. See for example his (1995), La modélisation des systèmes complexes, Dunod, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See for example de Bono, Edward, 1973,The Use of Lateral Thinking, Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hildebrandt, Steen, 1980, “The changing role of analysts in effective implementation of operational research and management science”,EJOR,5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Foucault, Michel, 1970,L’ordre du discours, Collège de France.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kant, Immanuel, 1787, Prolegomena to the Kritik der reinen Fernunft, 2nd edition..

    Google Scholar 

  20. Husserl, Edmund, 1900, Prolegomena to the Logische Untersuchungen.

    Google Scholar 

  21. In their The Unbounded Mind.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tomlinson, Rolfe, 1900, “Of tools, methods and methodology”, In Eden & Radford eds.,Tackling Strategic Problems, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Crooper, Steve, 1990, “Variety, formality and style”, In Eden & Radford eds.,Tackling Strategic Problems, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Midgley, Gerald, 2000,Systemic Intervention, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jackson, Mike C., 2004,Systems Thinking, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  26. There is a book in honour of Niklas Luhman which is extremely clear about this: Bakken, T. and Hernes, T., eds., 2003,Autopoietic Organization Theory, Abstrakt forlag, Kopenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Moisdon, J-C., 1997,Du mode d’existence des outils de gestion, Seli Arslan.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Agrell, Per Sigurd, 1979,Vett och vilja i värdering av ledningssystem, FOI, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Popper, Karl, 1934,Logik der Forschung.

    Google Scholar 

  30. In Friend, J. and Hickling, A., 2005,Planning under Pressure, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See for example Wiener, Norbert, 1950,The Human Use of Human Beings, Miflin and Miller, James. G., 1978,Living Systems, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Roy, Bernard, 1985,Methodologie multicritère d’aide à la decision, Economica, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Friend, John & Hickling, Allen, 2005,Planning Under Pressure, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  34. We find all this in the Planning Under Preassure and in a special issue of the Planning Theory,3(3), November 2004.

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  35. Churchman, W., 1978,The Systems Approach and its Enemies, Basic Books, N Y.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ackoff, Russel, 1979, “The future of OR is passed”,J Opl Res Soc,2.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Linstone, Harold A., 1984,Multiple Perspectives for Decisionmaking, North Holland, NY, Amsterdam, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  38. van Gigch, John P., 2003,Metadecisions: Rehabilitating Epistemology, Kluwer/Plenum, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Agrell, P. (2006). Expanding Churchman’s Philosophical Discourse. In: van Gigch, J.P. (eds) Wisdom, Knowledge, and Management. C.West Churchman and Related Works Series, vol 2. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36506-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics