Skip to main content

The Future of the Life Course

Late Modernity and Life Course Risks

  • Chapter
Handbook of the Life Course

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

The future of the life course in the United States over the next several decades, and in some other late-modern societies, is best considered in the light of major demographic and institutional changes. The life course—when defined as interdependent sequences of age-related social roles across life domains (family, education, work, health, leisure)—is a product of the linkages among state (welfare), market and familial (gender) institutions and demographic behaviors across the life span. When these linkages are tightly coupled and universally salient in a population their coherence and normative strength lead to a more highly institutionalized, age-graded life course. Alternatively, when these linkages are loosely coupled, variability (de-institutionalization) in the life course increases: the relationship of age to role transitions weakens and the synchronization of roles across life domains becomes less standardized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bajtelsmit, V. L., & VanDerhei, J. L. (1997). Risk aversion and pension investment choices. In M. S. Gordon, O. S. Mitchell, & M. M. Twinney (Eds.), Positioning pensions for the twenty first century, (pp. 45–66). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Pension Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtless, G. (2000). Social security privatization and financial market risk. Working Paper No. 10. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Social and Economic Dynamics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Employee Benefits Research Institute (EBRI). (1993). Public Attitudes on Investment Preferences. Washington, DC: EBRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundation of postindustrial economies. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Even, W E., & Macpherson, D. A. (2000). The changing distribution of pension coverage. Industrial Relations, 39, 199–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber, H., & Levy, H. (1998). Recent trends in employer-sponsored health insurance coverage: are bad jobs getting worse. NBER Working Paper No. 6709. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, N. J. (1999). Postmodern reflection on ‘risk,’ ‘hazards,’ and life choices. In D. Lupton (Ed.), Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives, (pp. 14–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geanakoplos, J., Mitchell, O. S., & Zeldes, S. P. (1998). Would a privatized social security system really pay a higher rate of return? NBER Working Paper No. 2266. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. S., Mitchell, O. S., & Twinney, M. M. (Eds). (1997). Positioning pensions for the twenty-first century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Pension Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustman, A. L., & Steinmeier, T. L. (1999). What people don’t know about their pensions and social security: An analysis using linked data from the health and retirement study. NBER Working Paper No. 7368. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito, R. A., & Thompson, J. W. (2000) The survival rate of defined benefit plans, 1987-1995. Industrial Relations, 39, 228–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R. L. (1999). Caution: Health care is hazardous to the aging self. In K. W Schaie & J. Hendricks (Eds.), The evolution of the aging self: The societal impact on the aging self. (pp. 225–249). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landerman, L. R. et al. (1998). Private health insurance coverage and disability among older Americans. Journal of Gerontology-Social Sciences, 53B, S258–S266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luchak, A. A., & Gunderson, M. (2000). What do employees know about their pension plan? Industrial Relations, 39, 646–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (Ed.). (1999). Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manton, K. G., & Stallard, E. (1996). Longevity in the United States: Age and sex-specific evidence on life span limits from mortality patterns, 1960-1990. Journal of Gerontology—Biological Sciences, 51A, B362-B375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. G., & Kevin, L. (1994). Research on the demography of aging in developing countries. In L. G. Martin & S. H. Preston (Eds.), Demography of aging, (pp. 356–404). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, O. S. (1988). Workers’ knowledge of pension provisions. Journal of Labor Economics, 6, 28–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Rand, A. M. (2000a). Risk, rationality and modernity: Social policy and the aging self. In K. W Schaie & J. Hendricks (Eds.), The evolution of the aging self: The societal impact on the aging self. (pp. 225–249). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rand, A. M. (2000b). Life course risks and inequality. Presented in the Presidential Symposium on “Aging, Social Policy and Risk: Lessons Not Yet Learned,” Gerontological Society of America, Washington, DC, November 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rand, A. M. (2001). Perpetuating women’s disadvantage: Trends in US private pensions, 1976-1995. In J. Ginn, D. Street & S. Arber (Eds.), Women, work and pensions: International issues and prospects, (pp. 230–256). Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rand, A. M., & Henretta, J. C. (1999). Age and inequality: Diverse pathways through later life. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J.F. (1997). Retirement trends and patterns in the 1990: The end of an era? Public Policy and Aging Report, 8, 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, M. W (1998). The hidden age revolution: emergent integration of all ages. Policy Brief 12/1998. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University/Center for Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeeding, T. M. (1997). Financial poverty in developed countries: The evidence from LIS. Luxembourg Income Study, Working Paper No. 155. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University/Center for Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunden, A. (2000). How will Sweden’s new pension system work? Issue in Brief (March, No. 3). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, Center for Retirement Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlenberg, P. (1992). Population aging and social policy. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 449–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Labor. (1995) Retirement benefits of American workers: New findings from the September 1994 Current Population Survey. Washington, DC: USGPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmoth, J. R. (1998). The future of human longevity: A demographer’s perspective. Science, 280, 395–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Rand, A.M. (2003). The Future of the Life Course. In: Mortimer, J.T., Shanahan, M.J. (eds) Handbook of the Life Course. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48247-2_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48247-2_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-47498-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48247-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics