Skip to main content

The Economic Theory of Clubs

  • Chapter
The Encyclopedia of Public Choice

Abstract

Clubs, whether one speaks of the Girl Guides, the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club, a homeowners’ association, or the Republican Party, are private organizations whose members collectively consume (and often produce) at least one good or service that no one person has the capacity unilaterally to finance. Clubs are thus of interest to public choice scholars because they must solve the same kinds of collective action problems government faces in the provision of public goods. Moreover, while there are exceptions to the rule (e.g., closed union shops), clubs solve these problems voluntarily rather than coercively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alchian, A.A. and Demsetz, H. (1972). “Production, information costs, and economic organization.” American Economic Review, 62(December): 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1965). “An economic theory of clubs.” Economica, 32(February): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. and Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassella, A. and Frey, B.S. (1992). “Federalism and clubs: towards an economic theory of overlapping political jurisdictions.” European Economic Review, 36(April): 639–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornes, R. and Sandler, T. ([1986] 1996). The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods, Second Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foldvary, F. (1994). Public Goods and Private Communities: The Market Provision of Social Services. Aldershot, UK, and Brookfield, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. (1997). “The public choice of international organizations,” in D.C. Mueller (ed.), Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 106–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, K. and Sandler, T. (1999). “NATO burden-sharing: past and future.” Journal of Peace Research, 36(November): 665–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannaccone, L.R. (1992). “Sacrifice and stigma: reducing free-riding in cults, communes, and other collectives.” Journal of Political Economy, 100(April): 271–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannaccone, L.R. (1997). “Toward an economic theory of ‘fundamentalism’.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 153(March): 110–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannaccone, L.R. (1998). “Introduction to economics of religion.” Journal of Economic Literature, 36(September): 1465–1495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennelly, B. and Murrell, P. (1991). “Industry characteristics and interest group formation: an empirical study.” Public Choice, 70(April): 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimenyi, M.S. (1989). “Interest groups, transfer seeking, and democratization.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 48(July): 339–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimenyi, M.S. and Mbaku, J.M. (1993). “Rent-seeking and institutional stability in developing countries.” Public Choice, (October): 385–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimenyi, M.S. and Shughart, W.F. II (1989). “Political successions and the growth of government.” Public Choice, 62(August): 173–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laband, D.N. and Beil, R.O. (1999). “Are economists more selfish than other’ social’ scientists?” Public Choice, 100(July): 85–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R.Z. (2002). “International trade policy in the 1990s,” in J.A. Frankel and P.R. Orsag (eds.) American Economic Policy in the 1990s, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 277–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz, A. and Tollison, R.D. (1980). “Free riding, shirking, and team production in legal partnerships.” Economic Inquiry, 18(July): 380–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D.C. (1989). Public Choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (A revised edition of Public Choice.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. and Zeckhauser, R. (1966). “An economic theory of alliances.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 48(August): 266–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, T. (1992). Collective Action: Theory and Applications. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, T. (1993). “The economic theory of alliances: a survey.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37(September): 446–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, T. and Forbes, J.F. (1980). “Burden sharing, strategy, and the design of NATO.” Economic Inquiry, 18(July): 425–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, T. and Hartley, K. (2001). “Economics of alliances: the lessons for collective action.” Journal of Economic Literature, 39(September): 869–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, T. and Murdoch, J.C. (2000). “On sharing NATO defense burdens in the 1990s and beyond.” Fiscal Studies, 21(September): 297–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, T. and Tschirhart, J. (1980). “The economic theory of clubs: an evaluative survey.” Journal of Economic Literature, 18(December): 1481–1521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, T. and Tschirhart, J. (1997). “Club theory: thirty years later.” Public Choice, 93(December): 335–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C.M. (1956). “A pure theory of local expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy, 64(October): 416–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollison, R.D. and Willett, T.D. (1979). “An economic theory of mutually advantageous issue linkages in international negotiations.” International Organization, 33(Autumn): 425–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, G.M., Shughart, W.F., Tollison, R.D. (2004). The Economic Theory of Clubs. In: Rowley, C.K., Schneider, F. (eds) The Encyclopedia of Public Choice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_81

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_81

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-8607-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47828-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics