Skip to main content

Welfare Economics and Public Choice

  • Chapter
The Encyclopedia of Public Choice

Abstract

Welfare economics provides the basis for judging the achievements of markets and policy makers in allocating resources. Its most powerful conceptual tool is the utility possibility frontier. This defines the set of utility allocations that can be achieved in a society subject to the constraints of tastes and technologies. Any allocation on the frontier cannot be Pareto dominated and hence would satisfy a rather minimal condition for it to be socially desirable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aghion, P. and Bolton, P. (1990). “Government debt and the risk of default: A politico-economic model of the strategic role of debt,” in R. Dornbusch and M. Draghi (eds.) Public Debt Management: Theory and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley (2nd Edition, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1980). Lectures on Public Economics. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baye, M., Kovenock, D., and De Vries, C. (1994). “The solution to the tullock rent seeking game when R>2: Mixed-strategy equilibria and mean dissipation rates.” Public Choice, 81: 363–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. and Coate, S. (1997). “An economic model of representative democracy.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1): 85–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. and Coate, S. (1998). “Sources of inefficiency in a representative democracy: A dynamic analysis.” American Economic Review 88(1): 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. and Coate, S. (2001). “Lobbying and welfare in a representative democracy.” Review of Economic Studies 68(1): 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. and Coate, S. (2003). “On the public choice critique of welfare economics.” in Public Choice, 114: 253–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biais, B. and Perotti, E. (2002). “Machiavellian Underpricing.” in the American Economic Review, 92: 240–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J.M. (1980). The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J.M. (1985). The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1972). “Toward an analysis of closed behavioral systems,” chapter 2 in J. Buchanan and R. Tollison (eds.) Theory of Public Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. and Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coate, S. and Morris, S. (1995). “On the form of transfers to special interests.” Journal of Political Economy, 103: 1210–1235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, P. (1992). Probabilistic Voting Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1994). “Protection for Sale.” American Economic Review, 84: 833–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1996). “Electoral competition and special interest politics.” Review of Economic Studies, 63(2): 265–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P. (1979). “Straightforward incentive compatibility in large economies.” Review of Economic Studies, 46: 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. (1974). “The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society.” American Economic Review, 64: 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milesi-Ferretti, G.-M. and Spolaore, E. (1994). “How Cynical Can an Incumbent Be? Strategic Policy in a Model of Government Spending.” Journal of Public Economics, 55: 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, J.A. (1971). “An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation.” Review of Economic Studies, 38: 175–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. and Svensson, L. (1989). “Why a Stubborn Conservative Would Run a Deficit: Policy with Time-Inconsistent Preferences.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104: 325–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1977). “On weights and measures: informational constraints in social welfare analysis.” Econometrica, 45: 1539–1572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabellini, G. and Alesina, A. (1990). “Voting on the budget deficit.” American Economic Review, 80: 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1967). “The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies and theft.” Western Economic Journal, 5: 224–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, D. (1989). “Why democracies produce efficient results.” Journal of Political Economy, 97: 1395–1426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Besley, T. (2004). Welfare Economics and Public Choice. In: Rowley, C.K., Schneider, F. (eds) The Encyclopedia of Public Choice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_213

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_213

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-8607-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47828-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics