Skip to main content

Forecasting Presidential Elections in the United States

  • Chapter
The Encyclopedia of Public Choice

Abstract

It is widely believed that U.S. presidential elections represent a referendum on the policies and achievements of the incumbent party. Pioneering studies by Kramer (1971) and Fair (1978, Fair 1982, Fair 1988, Fair 1996) found empirical support for this proposition; specifically, both concluded that more rapid growth of real output produced gains for the party of the incumbent president. Following Kramer and Fair, others have investigated empirical links between election outcomes and economic performance using a variety of techniques, specifications, and data sets. These empirical relationships are often referred to as “vote functions.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramowitz, A. (1992). “An improved model for predicting presidential outcomes.” PS: Political Science and Politics, 21: 843–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramowitz, A. (1996). “Bill and Al’s excellent adventure: forecasting the 1996 presidential election.” American Politics Quarterly, 24: 434–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, N. (2000). “Evaluating forecasts and forecasting modles of the 1996 presidential election,” in J. Campbell and J. Garand (eds.) Before the Vote: Forecasting American National Elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. and Chappell, H. (1999) Forecasting presidential elections using history and polls. International Journal of Forecasting, 15: 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (1996). “Polls and votes: the trial heat presidential election forecasting model, certainty, and political campaigns.” American Politics Quarterly, 24: 408–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. and Wink, K. (1992) “Trial-heat forecasts of the presidential vote.” American Politics Quarterly, 18: 251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R. and Wlezien, C. (1996). “Temporal horizons and presidential election forecasts.” American Politics Quarterly, 24: 492–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fair, R. (1978). “The effect of economic events on votes for president.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 60: 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fair, R. (1982). “The effect of economic events on votes for president: 1980 results.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 64: 322–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fair, R. (1988). “The effect of economic events on votes for president: 1984 update.” Political Behavior, 10: 168–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fair, R. (1996). “Econometrics and presidential elections.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3: 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe, R., Nelson, F., Neumann, G., and Wright, J. (1992). “Anatomy of an Experimental Political Stock Market.” American Economic Review, 82:1142–1161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A. and King, G. (1993). “Why are American presidential election campaign polls so variable when votes are so predictable?” British Journal of Political Science, 23: 409–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D. (2000). “Bread and peace voting in U.S. presidential elections.” Public Choice, 104: 149–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, T. (1991). “Reading the political tea leaves: a forecasting model of contemporary presidential elections.” American Politics Quarterly, 24: 434–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, G. (1971). “Short-term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior 1896–1964.” American Political Science Review, 65: 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, M. and Rice, T. (1992). Forecasting Elections. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, M. and Tien, C. (1996). “The future in forecasting: prospective presidential models.” American Politics Quarterly, 24: 468–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstone, S. (1983). Forecasting Presidential Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chappell, H. (2004). Forecasting Presidential Elections in the United States. In: Rowley, C.K., Schneider, F. (eds) The Encyclopedia of Public Choice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_106

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_106

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-8607-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47828-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics