Skip to main content
  • 596 Accesses

Abstract

Having pondered what history you want to write about, and why, the next question to ask yourself is, ‘Who for?’ This is perhaps the most important question of all. If you can’t establish who your readers will be, you will find it extremely difficult to write well.

No other discipline has its portals so wide open to the general public as history.

JOHAN HUIZINGA, MEN AND IDEAS1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Johann Huizinga, Men and Ideas (London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1960), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, e.g. William Kelleher Storey, Writing History: A guide for students, 3rd edn (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009);

    Google Scholar 

  3. I.W. Mabbett, Writing History Essays: A student’s guide (Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007);

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jules R. Benjamin, A Student’s Guide to History, 10th edn (Boston: Bedford/St Martins, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ann McGrath, Born in the Cattle (Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1987);

    Google Scholar 

  6. Joan Wallach Scott, ‘Introduction, A.H.R. Forum: Revisiting “Gender: A useful category of historical analysis”,’ The American Historical Review 113, no. 5 (2008): 1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Patrick Wolfe, ‘Land, labor, and difference: Elementary structures of race,’ The American Historical Review 106, no. 3 (2001): 866–905;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dipesh Chakrabarty, ‘Postcoloniality and the artifice of history: Who speaks for “Indian” pasts?,’ Representations 37 (Winter 1992): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. William Germano, Getting It Published: A guide for scholars and anyone else serious about serious books (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eleanor Harman & Ian Montagnes, The Thesis and the Book, 2nd edn (Toronto: University Of Toronto Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Tessa Morris-Suzuki, The Past Within Us: Media, memory, history (London: Verso, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  12. James R. Millar, ed., Encyclopedia of Russian History (New York: Macmillan Reference, 2004), vii.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martin Marix Evans, Encyclopedia of the Boer War: 1899–1902 (Santa Barbara, California: ABC-Clio, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Ann Curthoys, Ann Genovese & Alexander Reilly, Rights and Redemption: History, law, and Indigenous people (Sydney: UNSW Press, 2008);

    Google Scholar 

  15. Iain McCalman & Ann McGrath, eds, Proof and Truth: The humanist as expert (Canberra: The Australian Academy of the Humanities, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  16. For an example of a commissioned history which was rejected see Rachel Wells, ‘A century of history for sale in biography of an emporium’, The Age, 14 September 2008: <www.theage.com.au/national/a-century-of-history-for-sale-in-biography-of-an-emporium-20080913-4fyc.html>

    Google Scholar 

  17. Langston Hughes, Fight for Freedom: The story of the NAACP (New York: W.W. Norton, 1962), 203.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jonathan Steinberg, in co-operation with the members ofthe Historical Commission appointed to examine the history of the Deutsche Bank in the period of National Socialism, The Deutsche Bank and Its Gold Transactions During the Second World War (Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck, 1999), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Robert Fitzgerald, Rowntree and the Marketing Revolution, 1862–1969 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995);

    Google Scholar 

  20. John E Wilson, ‘Review of Robert Fitzgerald, Rowntree and the Marketing Revolution, 1862–1969’, EH Net Economic History Services (1995), <http://eh.net/bookreviews/library/0010>.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Richard White, Remembering Ah anagran: A history of stories (New York: Hill & Wang, 1998);

    Google Scholar 

  22. Michael King, Being Pakeha Now: Reflections and recollections of a white native (Auckland: Penguin Books (NZ), 1999);

    Google Scholar 

  23. Timothy Kenslea, The Sedgwicks in Love: Courtship, engagement, and marriage in the early Republic (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 2006);

    Google Scholar 

  24. Annette Gordon-Reed, The Hemingses of Monticello: An American family (New York: W.W. Norton, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ann McGrath, ‘Must film be fiction?,’ Griffith Review, no. 24 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Frank L. Cioffi, The Imaginative Argument: A practical manifesto for writers (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005), 22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2011 Ann Curthoys and Ann McGrath

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Curthoys, A., McGrath, A. (2011). Who is your history for?. In: How to Write History that People Want to Read. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-30496-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-30496-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-230-29038-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30496-3

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics