Skip to main content

Rate-Responsive Pacing Controlled by the TVI Sensor in the Treatment of Sick Sinus Syndrome

  • Chapter
Cardiac Arrhythmias 2005

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rosenqvist M (1990) Atrial pacing for sick sinus syndrome. Clin Cardiol 13:43–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Santini M, Ricci R, Pignalberi C et al (2004) Effect of autonomic stressors on rate control in pacemakers using ventricular impedance signal. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 27:24–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruiter JH, Heemels JP, Kee D et al (1992) Adaptive rate pacing controlled by the right ventricular preejection interval: clinical experience with a physiological pacing system. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 15:886–894

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Clementy J, Kobeissi A, Garrigue S et al (2001) Validation by serial standardized testing of a new rate-responsive pacemaker sensor based on variations in myocardial contractility. Europace 3:124–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Greco EM, Ferrario M, Romano S (2003) Clinical evaluation of peak endocardial acceleration as a sensor for rate responsive pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 26 [Pt I]:812–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Griesbach L, Gestrich B, Wojciechowski D et al (2003) Clinical performance of automatic closed-loop stimulation systems. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 26 [Pt I]:1432–1437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rickards AF, Bombardini T, Corbucci G et al (1996) An implantable intracardiac accelerometer for monitoring myocardial contractility. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:2066–2071

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fananapazir L, Bennett DH, Faragher EB (1983) Contribution of heart rate to QT interval shortening during exercise. Eur Heart J 4:265–271

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cron TA, Hilti P, Schächinger H et al (2003) Rate response of a closed-loop stimulation pacing system to changing preload and afterload conditions. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 26 [Pt I]:1504–1510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Di Gregorio F, Morra A, Finesso M et al (1996) Transvalvular impedance (TVI) recording under electrical and pharmacological cardiac stimulation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19 [Pt II]:1689–1693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Morra A, Panarotto D, Santini P et al (1997) Transvalvular impedance (TVI) sensing: a new way toward the hemodynamic control of cardiac pacing. In: Vardas PE (ed) Europace’ 97. Monduzzi Editore, Bologna, pp 529–533

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chirife R (1991) Acquisition of hemodynamic data and sensor signals for rate control from standard pacing electrodes. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 14:1563–1565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chirife R, Ortega DF, Salazar A (1993) Feasibility of measuring relative right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction with implantable rhythm control devices. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 16:1673–1683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chirife R, Tentori MC, Mazzetti H et al (2001) Hemodynamic sensors: are they all the same? In: Raviele A (ed) Cardiac Arrhythmias 2001. Springer, Milan, pp 566–575

    Google Scholar 

  15. Di Gregorio F, Curnis A, Pettini A et al (2002) Trans-valvular impedance (TVI) in the hemodynamic regulation of cardiac pacing. In: Mitro P, Pella D, Rybár R, Valocvik G (eds) Cardiovascular Diseases 2002. Monduzzi Editore, Bologna, pp 53–57

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chirife R (2003) Hemodynamic assessment with implantable pacemakers. How feasible and reliable is it? In: Raviele A (ed) Cardiac Arrhythmias 2003. Springer, Milan, pp 705–712

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gasparini G, Curnis A, Gulizia M et al (2003) Can hemodynamic sensors ensure physiological rate control? In: Raviele A (ed) Cardiac Arrhythmias 2003. Springer, Milan, pp 725–731

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gasparini G, Curnis A, Gulizia M et al (2005) Rate-responsive pacing regulated by cardiac haemodynamics. Europace 7:234–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bongiorni MG, Soldati E, Arena G et al (2005) Haemodynamic assessment by transvalvular impedance recording. In: Gulizia MM (ed) Emerging pathologies in cardiology. Springer, Milan, pp 323–330

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leung SK, Lau CP, Tang MO et al (1996) New integrated sensor pacemaker: comparison of rate responses between an integrated minute ventilation and activity sensor and single sensor modes during exercise and daily activities and nonphysiological interference. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19 [Pt II]:1664–1671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Barold SS, Clémenty J (1997) The promise of improved exercise performance by dual sensor rate adaptive pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 20 [Pt I]:607–609

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bennett T, Sharma A, Sutton R et al (1992) Development of a rate adaptive pacemaker based on the maximum rate-of-rise of right ventricular pressure (RV dP/dtmax). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 15:219–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pichlmaier AM, Braile D, Ebner E et al (1992) Autonomic nervous system controlled closed loop cardiac pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 15:1787–1791

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Osswald S, Cron T, Gradel C et al (2000) Closed-loop stimulation using intracardiac impedance as a sensor principle: correlation of right ventricular dP/dtmax and intracardiac impedance during dobutamine stress test. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23:1502–1508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Plicchi G, Marcelli E, Parlapiano M et al (2002) PEA I and PEA II based implantable haemodynamic monitor: pre clinical studies in sheep. Europace 4:49–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Erol-Yilmaz A, Tukkie R, De Boo J et al (2004) Direct comparison of a contractility and activity pacemaker sensor during treadmill exercise testing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 27:1493–1499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dorticós F, Quiñones MA, Tornes F et al (2005) Transvalvular impedance in the autoregulation of a cardiac pacemaker. In: Gulizia MM (ed) Emerging pathologies in cardiology. Springer, Milan, pp 347–354

    Google Scholar 

  28. Occhetta E, Magnani A, Bortnik M et al (2003) Hemodynamic sensors: their impact in clinical practice. In: Raviele A (ed) Cardiac Arrhythmias 2003. Springer, Milan, pp 713–718

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dorticós, F. et al. (2006). Rate-Responsive Pacing Controlled by the TVI Sensor in the Treatment of Sick Sinus Syndrome. In: Raviele, A. (eds) Cardiac Arrhythmias 2005. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0371-7_71

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0371-7_71

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0370-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0371-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics