Skip to main content

Surgical Procedures and Clinical Results of Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Canal Stenosis

  • Conference paper
State of the Art for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical indication and clinical outcomes of endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. From September 1998 to March 2002, 250 consecutive patients underwent posterior endoscopic surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. Among these patients, 27 were treated by posterior endoscopic decompression for lumbar canal stenosis. There were 19 men and 8 women, and their average age was 60 ± 12.8 years. The major preoperative symptom was neurologic claudication, sometimes accompanied by sciatica. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system for lumbar disease (maximum score, 29). Among the 27 patients, the average JOA score was 13.7 ± 3.8 preoperatively, which improved to 26.4 ± 2.8 postoperatively. The average operation time was 56 min for one level, and the average blood loss was 46ml for one level. There were no interoperative complications. The microendoscopic decompression technique is characterized by a small skin incision, less invasion of paraspinal muscle, and a small dead space. The ipisilateral approach and contralateral endoscopic decompression can be performed under the midline posterior structures the same as microsurgical decompression. This endoscopical decompression minimizes resection of the pathologic compression tissues and affords a safe procedure. The clinical outcome was excellent and patient satisfaction was good in most cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Iguchi T, Kurihara A, Nakayama J, et al (2000) Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 25:1754–1759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nakai O, Ookawa A, Yamamura IF (1991) Long-term roentgenographic and functional changes in patients who were treated with wide fenestration for central lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg 73A:1184–1191

    Google Scholar 

  3. Postacchini F (1999) Surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 24:1043–1047

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aryanpur J, Ducker T (1990) Multilevel lumbar laminotomies: an alternative to laminectomy in the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery 26:429–433

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. See DH, Kraft GH (1975) Electromyography in paraspinal muscles following surgery for root compression. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 56:80–83

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljarva L, et al (1993) Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine 18:575–581

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tuite GF, Stern JD, Doran SE, et al (1994) Outcome after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I. Clinical correlations. J Neurosurg 81:699–706

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnsson KE, Redlund-Johnell I, Uden A (1989) Preoperative and postoperative instability in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 14:591–593

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Foley KT, Smith MM (1997) Microendoscopic discectomy. Techniques Neurosurg 3:301–307

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshida M, Katoh K, Sumiya H, et al (2001) Clinical evaluation of microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: comparison of MED and Love (in Japanese). Clin Orthop Surg 36:497–502

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yoshida M, Sumiya H, Iwasaki K, et al (2001) Initial clinical outcomes of microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Spine Spinal Cord 14:381–388

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshida M, Shima K, Taniguchi Y, et al (1992) Hypertrophied ligamentum flavum in lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Pathogenesis and morphologic and immunohistochemical observation. Spine 17:1353–1360

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McCulloch JA (1998) Microsurgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Essentials of spinal microsurgery. Lippincott-Raven, New York, pp. 475–480

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weiner BK, Walker M, Brower R, et al (1999) Microsurgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine 24:2268–2272

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Tokyo

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yoshida, M., Ueyoshi, A., Maio, K., Kawai, M., Nakagawa, Y. (2005). Surgical Procedures and Clinical Results of Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Canal Stenosis. In: Dezawa, A., Chen, PQ., Chung, JY. (eds) State of the Art for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/4-431-26666-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/4-431-26666-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-01248-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-26666-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics