Skip to main content

An approach to the verification of the Center-TRACON automation system

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control (HSCC 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1386))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The Center-TRACON Automation System (CTAS) is a collection of planning and control software functions that generate landing schedules and advisories to assist air traffic controllers in handling traffic in the en-route and terminal areas. In this paper, we propose a formal safety analysis methodology to determine the correctness of CTAS with respect to safety. Four large classes of safety notions are identified for the CTAS problem: nominal, robust, structural and degraded. For nominal safety questions we seek conditions under which the system is guaranteed to be nominally safe.

Research supported by the FAA and NASA under Research Contract DTFA03-97-D-0004 and Grant 96-C-001 and by the Army Research Office under Grant DAAH 04-95-1-0588.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H. Erzberger, T.J. Davis, and S. Green. Design of center-TRACON automation system. In Proceedings of the AGARD Guidance and Control Symposium on Machine Intelligence in Air Traffic Management, Berlin, Germany, May 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. John Lygeros and Nancy Lynch. Towards the formal verification of the TCAS conflict resolution algorithms. In IEEE Control and Decision Conference, pages 1829–1834, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Nedell and H. Erzberger. The traffic management advisor. In American Control Conference, San Diego, CA, December 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Steven M. Green, Robert A. Vivona, and Beverly Sanford. Descent advisor preliminary field test. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, Baltimore, MD, August 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T.J. Davis, K.J. Krzeczowski, and C. Bergh. The final approach spacing tool. In Proceedings of the 13th IFAC Symposium on Automatic Control in Aerospace, Palo Alto, CA, September 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Green, T. Goka, and D.H. Williams. Enabling user preferences through data exchange. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, New Orleans, LA, August 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics. Final report of RTCA Task Force 3: Free Flight Implementation. Technical report, RTCA, Washington, DC, October 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nancy Lynch, Roberto Segala, Frits Vaandrager, and H.B. Weinberg. Hybrid I/O automata. In Hybrid Systems III, number 1066 in LNCS, pages 496–510. Springer Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. George Pappas, John Lygeros, Shankar Sastry, and Nancy Lynch. Modeling, specification and safety analysis of CTAS. Technical Report NEXTOR Research Report RR-97-5, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, September 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Thomas A. Henzinger Shankar Sastry

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lygeros, J., Pappas, G.J., Sastry, S. (1998). An approach to the verification of the Center-TRACON automation system. In: Henzinger, T.A., Sastry, S. (eds) Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control. HSCC 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1386. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-64358-3_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-64358-3_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64358-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69754-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics