Skip to main content

Improving 3D Active Visual Tracking

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Vision Systems (ICVS 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1542))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Tracking in 3D with an active vision system depends on the performance of both motor control and vision algorithms. Tracking is performed based on different visual behaviors, namely smooth pursuit and vergence control. A major issue in a system performing tracking is its robustness to partial occlusion of the target as well as its robustness to sudden changes of target trajectory. Another important issue is the reconstruction of the 3D trajectory of the target. These issues can only be dealt with if the performance of the algorithms is evaluated. The evaluation of such performances enable the identification of the limits and weaknesses in the system behavior. In this paper we describe the results of the analysis of a binocular tracking system. To perform the evaluation a control framework was used both for the vision algorithms and for the servo-mechanical system. Due to the geometry changes in an active vision system, the problem of defining and generating system reference inputs has specific features. In this paper we analyze this problem, proposing and justifying a methodology for the definition and generation of such reference inputs. As a result several algorithms were improved and the global performance of the system was also enhanced. This paper proposes a methodology for such an analysis (and resulting enhancements) based on techniques from control theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ruzena Bajcsy. Active perception vs. passive perception. Third Workshop on Computer Vision: Representatin and Control, pages 55–59, October 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Aloimonos, I. Weiss, and A. Bandyopadhay. Active vision. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1(4):333–356, January 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. I. Christensen, J. Horstmann, and T. Rasmussen. A control theoretic approach to active vision. Asian Conference on Computer Vision, pages 201–210, December 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. L. Crowley, J. M. Bedrune, M. Bekker, and M. Schneider. Integration and control of reactive visula processes. Third European Conference in Computer Vision, 2:47–58, May 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. O. Eklundh, K. Pahlavan, and T. Uhlin. The kth head-eye system. In Vision as a Process, pages 237–259, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Vieville. A few steps towards 3d active vision. Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Bernardino and J. Santos-Victor. Sensor geometry for dynamic vergence: Characterization and performance analysis. Workshop on Performance Characterization of Vision Algorithms, pages 55–59, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Hager and S. Hutchinson. Special section on vision-based control of robot manipulators. IEEE Trans. on Robot. and Automat., 12(5), October 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Horaud and F. Chaumette, editors. Workshop on New Trends in Image-Based Robot Servoing, September 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Dickmanns. Vehicles capable of dynamic vision. in Proc. of the 15th International Conference on Artificail Intelligence, August 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Dickmanns. An approach to robust dynamic vision. in Proc. of the IEEE Workshop on Robust Vision for Vision-Based Control of Motion, May 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. I. Corke and M. C. Good. Dynamic effects in visual closed-loop systems. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, 12(5):671–683, October 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. I. Corke. Visual Control of Robots: High-Peformance Visual Servoing. Mechatronics. John Wiley, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Kelly. Robust asymptotically stable visual servoing of planar robots. IEEE Trans. on Robot. and Automat, 12(5):697–713, October 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. Hong. Robotic catching and manipulation using active vision. Master’s thesis, MIT, September 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Rizzi and D. E. Koditschek. An active visual estimator for dexterous manipulation. IEEE Trans. on Robot. and Automat, 12(5):697–713, October 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Sharkey, D. Murray, S. Vandevelde, I. Reid, and P. Mclauchlan. A modular head/eye platform for real-time reactive vision. Mechatronics, 3(4):517–535, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Sharkey and D. Murray. Delays versus performance of visually guided systems. IEE Proc.-Control Theory Appl., 143(5):436–447, September 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Brown. Gaze controls with interactions and delays. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybern., 20(2):518–527, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Coombs and C. Brown. Real-time binocular smooth pursuit. International Journal of Computer Vision, 11(2):147–164, October 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Rotstein and E. Rivlin. Optimal servoing for active foveated vision. in Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 177–182, June 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ulf M. Cahn von Seelen. Performance evaluation of an active vision system. Master’s thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA, May 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  23. B. Espiau, F. Chaumette, and P. Rives. A new approach to visual servoing in robotics. IEEE Trans. on Robot. and Automat., 8(3):313–326, June 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. Allen, A. Timcenko, B. Yoshimi, and P. Michelman. Automated tracking and grasping of a moving object with a robotic hand-eye system. IEEE Trans. on Robot. and Automat., 9(2):152–165, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Batista, P. Peixoto, and H. Araujo. Real-time active visual surveillance by integrating peripheral motion detection with foveated tracking. In Proc. of the IEEE Workshop on Visual Surveillance, pages 18–25, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Barreto, P. Peixoto, J. batista, and H. Araujo. Evaluation of the robustness of visual behaviors through performance characterization. in Proc. of the IEEE Workshop on Robust Vision for Vision-Based Control of Motion, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Barreto, P. Peixoto, J. Batista, and H. Araujo. Performance characterization of visula behaviors in an active vision system. In 6th International Symposium on Intelligent Robotic Systems, pages 309–318, July 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Barreto, J., Peixoto, P., Batista, J., Araujo, H. (1999). Improving 3D Active Visual Tracking. In: Computer Vision Systems. ICVS 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1542. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49256-9_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49256-9_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65459-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49256-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics