Skip to main content

Comparison of Supervised Self-Organizing Maps Using Euclidian or Mahalanobis Distance in Classification Context

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Connectionist Models of Neurons, Learning Processes, and Artificial Intelligence (IWANN 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2084))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The supervised self-organizing map consists in associating output vectors to input vectors through a map, after self-organizing it on the basis of both input and desired output given altogether. This paper compares the use of Euclidian distance and Mahalanobis distance for this model. The distance comparison is made on a data classification application with either global approach or partitioning approach. The Mahalanobis distance in conjunction with the partitioning approach leads to interesting classification results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Midenet, S., Grumbach, A.: Learning Associations by Self-Organization: the LASSO model. Neurocomputing, vol. 6. Elsevier, (1994) 343–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fessant, F., Aknin, P.: Classification de défauts de rail á l’aide de cartes auto-organisatrices supervisées. NSI’2000, Dinard (2000) 75–79

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ritter, H., Martinetz, T., Schulten, K.: Topology conserving maps for learning visuo motor coordination. Neural networks, vol. 2. (1989) 159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kohonen, T.: Self-Organizing Maps. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bishop, C. M.: Neural Networks for pattern recognition. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Oukhellou, L., Aknin, P., Perrin, J. P.: Dedicated sensor and classifier of rail head defects for railway systems. 8th IFAC Int. Symp. On Transportation Systems, Chania (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Oukhellou, L., Aknin, P., Stroppiglia, H., Dreyfus, G.: A new decisioin criterion for feature selection. Application to the classification of non destructive testing signatures. EUSIPCO, vol. 1 Rhodes (1998) 411–414

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oukhellou, L., Aknin, P.: Hybrid training of radial basis function networks in a partitioning context of classification. Neurocomputing, vol. 28 (1999) 165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fessant, F., Aknin, P., Oukhellou, L., Midenet, S. (2001). Comparison of Supervised Self-Organizing Maps Using Euclidian or Mahalanobis Distance in Classification Context. In: Mira, J., Prieto, A. (eds) Connectionist Models of Neurons, Learning Processes, and Artificial Intelligence. IWANN 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2084. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45720-8_76

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45720-8_76

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42235-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45720-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics