Skip to main content

Combining Proof-Search and Counter-Model Construction for Deciding Gödel-Dummett Logic

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2392))

Abstract

We present an algorithm for deciding Gödel-Dummett logic. The originality of this algorithm comes from the combination of proof-search in sequent calculus, which reduces a sequent to a set of pseudo-atomic sequents, and counter-model construction of such pseudo-atomic sequents by a fixpoint computation. From an analysis of this construction, we deduce a new logical rule [⊃ N ] which provides shorter proofs than the rule [⊃ R ] of G4-LC. We also present a linear implementation of the counter-model generation algorithm for pseudo-atomic sequents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alessendro Avellone, Mauro Ferrari, and Pierangelo Miglioli. Duplication-Free Tableau Calculi and Related Cut-Free Sequent Calculi for the Interpolable Propositional Intermediate Logics. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 7(4):447–480, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnon Avron. A Tableau System for Gödel-Dummett Logic Based on a Hyper-sequent Calculus. In Roy Dyckhoff, editor, Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods, volume 1847 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 98–111, St Andrews, Scotland, July 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Peter Deutsch and Daniel G. Bobrow. A Efficient Incremental Automatic Garbage Collector. Communications of the ACM, 19(9):522–526, September 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michael Dummett. A Propositional Calculus with a Denumerable matrix. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 24:96–107, 1959.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Roy Dyckhoff. Contraction-free Sequent Calculi for Intuitionistic Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 57(3):795–807, 1992.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Roy Dyckhoff. A Deterministic Terminating Sequent Calculus for Gödel-Dummett logic. Logical Journal of the IGPL, 7:319–326, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Fiorino. An O(n log n)-SPACE decision procedure for the propositional Dummett Logic. to appear in Journal of Automated Reasoning.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Didier Galmiche and Dominique Larchey-Wendling. Structural Sharing and Efficient Proof-Search in Propositional Intuitionistic Logic. In Asian Computing Science Conference, ASIAN’99, volume 1742 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 101–102, Phuket, Thaïland, December 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kurt Gödel. Zum intuitionistischen Aussagenkalkül. Ergeb. Math. Koll, 4:40, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Hajek. Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jörg Hudelmaier. An O(n log n)-space decision procedure for Intuitionistic Propositional Logic. Journal of Logic and Computation, 3(1):63–75, 1993.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Dominique Larchey, Daniel Méry, and Didier Galmiche. STRIP: Structural Sharing for efficient Proof-Search. In International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning, IJCAR 2001, volume 2083 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 696–700, Siena, Italy, January 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. O. Sonobe. A Gentzen-type Formulation of Some Intermediate Propositional Logics. Journal of Tsuda College, 7:7–14, 1975.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Visser. On the Completeness Principle: A study of provability in Heyting’s arithmetic. Annals of Mathematical Logic, 22:263–295, 1982.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Klaus Weich. Decisions Procedures for Intuitionistic Logic by Program Extraction. In International Conference TABLEAUX’98, volume 1397 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 292–306, Oisterwijk, The Netherlands, May 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Larchey-Wendling, D. (2002). Combining Proof-Search and Counter-Model Construction for Deciding Gödel-Dummett Logic. In: Voronkov, A. (eds) Automated Deduction—CADE-18. CADE 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2392. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45620-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45620-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43931-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45620-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics