Skip to main content

Is External Code Quality Correlated with Programming Experience or Feelgood Factor?

  • Conference paper
Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering (XP 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4044))

Abstract

This paper is inspired by an article by Müller and Padberg who study the feelgood factor and programming experience, as candidate drivers for the pair programming performance. We not only reveal a possible threat to validity of empirical results presented by Müller and Padberg but also perform an independent research. Our objective is to provide empirical evidence whether external code quality is correlated with the feelgood factor, or with programming experience. Our empirical study is based on a controlled experiment with MSc students. It appeared that the external code quality is correlated with the feelgood factor, and programming experience, in the case of pairs using a classic (test-last) testing approach. The generalization of the results is limited due to the fact that MSc students participated in the study. The research revealed that both the feelgood factor and programming experience may be the external code quality drivers.

This work has been financially supported by the Ministry of Education and Science as a research grant 3 T11C 061 30 (years 2006-2007).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Williams, L., Kessler, R.: Pair Programming Illuminated. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beck, K.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nosek, J.T.: The case for collaborative programming. Communications of the ACM 41(3), 105–108 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Williams, L., Kessler, R.R., Cunningham, W., Jeffries, R.: Strengthening the case for pair programming. IEEE Software 17(4), 19–25 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams, L.: The Collaborative Software Process. PhD thesis, University of Utah (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nawrocki, J.R., Wojciechowski, A.: Experimental evaluation of pair programming. In: ESCOM 2001: European Software Control and Metrics, pp. 269–276 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nawrocki, J.R., Jasiński, M., Olek, L., Lange, B.: Pair Programming vs. Side-by-Side Programming. In: Richardson, I., Abrahamsson, P., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3792, pp. 28–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams, L., Maximilien, E.M., Vouk, M.: Test-Driven Development as a Defect-Reduction Practice. In: ISSRE 2003: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, pp. 34–48. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Maximilien, E.M., Williams, L.A.: Assessing Test-Driven Development at IBM. In: ICSE 2003: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 564–569. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. George, B., Williams, L.A.: An Initial Investigation of Test Driven Development in Industry. In: SAC 2003: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1135–1139. ACM, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. George, B., Williams, L.A.: A structured experiment of test-driven development. Information and Software Technology 46(5), 337–342 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Madeyski, L.: Preliminary Analysis of the Effects of Pair Programming and Test-Driven Development on the External Code Quality. In: Zieliński, K., Szmuc, T. (eds.) Software Engineering: Evolution and Emerging Technologies. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 130, pp. 113–123. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Müller, M.M., Hagner, O.: Experiment about test-first programming. IEE Proceedings - Software 149(5), 131–136 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Müller, M.M.: Are Reviews an Alternative to Pair Programming? In: EASE 2003: Conference on Empirical Assessment In Software Engineering (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Müller, M.M.: Are Reviews an Alternative to Pair Programming? Empirical Software Engineering 9(4), 335–351 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hulkko, H., Abrahamsson, P.: A Multiple Case Study on the Impact of Pair Programming on Product Quality. In: ICSE 2005: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 495–504. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Müller, M.M., Padberg, F.: An empirical study about the feelgood factor in pair programming. In: METRICS 2004: Proceedings of the Software Metrics, 10th International Symposium on (METRICS 2004), pp. 151–158. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wesslén, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Williams, L.A., Kessler, R.R.: All I really need to know about pair programming I learned in kindergarten. Commun. ACM 43(5), 108–114 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Erdogmus, H., Morisio, M., Torchiano, M.: On the Effectiveness of the Test-First Approach to Programming. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31(3), 226–237 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T.: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S.L., Pickard, L., Jones, P., Hoaglin, D.C., Emam, K.E., Rosenberg, J.: Preliminary Guidelines for Empirical Research in Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28(8), 721–734 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Porter, A., Votta, L.: Comparing detection methods for software requirements inspections: A replication using professional subjects. Empirical Softw. Engg. 3(4), 355–379 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Höst, M., Wohlin, C., Thelin, T.: Experimental context classification: incentives and experience of subjects. In: ICSE 2005: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 470–478. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Madeyski, L. (2006). Is External Code Quality Correlated with Programming Experience or Feelgood Factor?. In: Abrahamsson, P., Marchesi, M., Succi, G. (eds) Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering. XP 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4044. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11774129_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11774129_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35094-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35095-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics