Skip to main content

Evaluating a Rule Evaluation Support Method Based on Objective Rule Evaluation Indices

  • Conference paper
Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3918))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3012 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we present an evaluation of novel rule evaluation support method for post-processing of mined results with rule evaluation models based on objective indices. Post-processing of mined results is one of the key issues in a data mining process. However, it is difficult for human experts to evaluate many thousands of rules from a large dataset with noises completely. To reduce the costs of rule evaluation task, we have developed the rule evaluation support method with rule evaluation models, which are obtained with objective indices of mined classification rules and evaluations of a human expert for each rule. To evaluate performances of learning algorithms for constructing rule evaluation models, we have done a case study on the meningitis data mining as an actual problem. Furthermore, we have also evaluated our method on four rulesets from the four kinds of UCI datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ali, K., Manganaris, S., Srikant, R.: Partial Classification Using Association Rules. In: Proc. of Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 1997, pp. 115–118 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brin, S., Motwani, R., Ullman, J., Tsur, S.: Dynamic itemset counting and implication rules for market basket data. In: Proc. of ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, pp. 255–264 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frank, E., Wang, Y., Inglis, S., Holmes, G., Witten, I.H.: Using model trees for classification. Machine Learning 32(1), 63–76 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Frank, E., Witten, I.H.: Generating accurate rule sets without global optimization. In: Proc. of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 144–151 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gago, P., Bento, C.: A Metric for Selection of the Most Promising Rules. In: Żytkow, J.M. (ed.) PKDD 1998. LNCS, vol. 1510, pp. 19–27. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodman, L.A., Kruskal, W.H.: Measures of association for cross classifications. In: Springer Series in Statistics, vol. 1, Springer, Heidelberg (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gray, B., Orlowska, M.E.: CCAIIA: Clustering Categorical Attributes into Interesting Association Rules. In: Wu, X., Kotagiri, R., Korb, K.B. (eds.) PAKDD 1998. LNCS, vol. 1394, pp. 132–143. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamilton, H.J., Shan, N., Ziarko, W.: Machine Learning of Credible Classifications. In: Proc. of Australian Conf. on Artificial Intelligence AI 1997, pp. 330–339 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hatazawa, H., Negishi, N., Suyama, A., Tsumoto, S., Yamaguchi, T.: Knowledge Discovery Support from a Meningoencephalitis Database Using an Automatic Composition Tool for Inductive Applications. In: Terano, T., Chen, A.L.P. (eds.) PAKDD 2000. LNCS, vol. 1805, pp. 28–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hettich, S., Blake, C.L., Merz, C.J.: UCI Repository of machine learning databases. University of California, Department of Information and Computer Science, Irvine (1998), http://www.ics.uci.edu/mlearn/MLRepository.html

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hilderman, R.J., Hamilton, H.J.: Knowledge Discovery and Measure of Interest. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hinton, G.E.: Learning distributed representations of concepts. In: Morris, R.G.M. (ed.) Proceedings of 8th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Amherest, MA (1986) (reprinted)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holte, R.C.: Very simple classification rules perform well on most commonly used datasets. Machine Learning 11, 63–91 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Klösgen, W.: Explora: A Multipattern and Multistrategy Discovery Assistant. In: Fayyad, U.M., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P., Uthurusamy, R. (eds.) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 249–271. AAAI/MIT Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ohsaki, M., Kitaguchi, S., Kume, S., Yokoi, H., Yamaguchi, T.: Evaluation of Rule Interestingness Measures with a Clinical Dataset on Hepatitis. In: Boulicaut, J.-F., Esposito, F., Giannotti, F., Pedreschi, D. (eds.) PKDD 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3202, pp. 362–373. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Piatetsky-Shapiro, G.: Discovery, Analysis and Presentation of Strong Rules. In: Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Frawley, W.J. (eds.) Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pp. 229–248. AAAI/MIT Press (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Platt, J.: Fast Training of Support Vector Machines using Sequential Minimal Optimization. In: Schölkopf, B., Burges, C., Smola, A. (eds.) Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning, pp. 185–208. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Quinlan, R.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rijsbergen, C.: Information Retrieval, Butterworths, London, vol. 7 (1979), http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/Keith/Chapter.7/Ch.7.html

  20. Smyth, P., Goodman, R.M.: Rule Induction using Information Theory. In: Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Frawley, W.J. (eds.) Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pp. 159–176. AAAI/MIT Press (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tan, P.N., Kumar, V., Srivastava, J.: Selecting the Right Interestingness Measure for Association Patterns. In: Proc. of Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining KDD 2002, pp. 32–41 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: DataMining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yao, Y.Y., Zhong, N.: An Analysis of QuantitativeMeasures Associated with Rules. In: Zhong, N., Zhou, L. (eds.) PAKDD 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1574, pp. 479–488. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhong, N., Yao, Y.Y., Ohshima, M.: Peculiarity Oriented Multi-Database Mining. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15(4), 952–960 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abe, H., Tsumoto, S., Ohsaki, M., Yamaguchi, T. (2006). Evaluating a Rule Evaluation Support Method Based on Objective Rule Evaluation Indices. In: Ng, WK., Kitsuregawa, M., Li, J., Chang, K. (eds) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. PAKDD 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3918. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11731139_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11731139_60

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33206-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33207-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics