Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3761))

Abstract

The problem of identifying approximately duplicate records between databases is known, among others, as duplicate detection or record linkage. To this end, typically either rules or a weighted aggregation of distances between the individual attributes of potential duplicates is used. However, choosing the appropriate rules, distance functions, weights, and thresholds requires deep understanding of the application domain or a good representative training set for supervised learning approaches. In this paper we present an unsupervised, domain independent approach that starts with a broad alignment of potential duplicates, and analyses the distribution of observed distances among potential duplicates and among non-duplicates to iteratively refine the initial alignment. Evaluations show that this approach supersedes other unsupervised approaches and reaches almost the same accuracy as even fully supervised, domain dependent approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Galhardas, H., Florescu, D., Shasha, D., Simon, E.: An extensible framework for data cleaning. In: Proceddings of the 16th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2000), p. 312 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hernandez, M.A., Stolfo, S.J.: Real-world data is dirty: Data cleansing and the merge/purge problem. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 2, 9–37 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jaro, M.: Advances in record linkage methodology as applied to matching the 1985 census of tampa. Journal of the American Statistical Society 84, 414–420 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Monge, A., Elkan, C.: An efficient domain independent algorithm for detecting approximately duplicate database records. In: Proceedings of the SIGMOD Workshop on Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, W.W., Ravikumar, P., Fienberg, S.E.: A comparison of string metrics for matching names and records. In: Proceedings of the KDD 2003 Workshop on Data Cleaning, Record Linkage, and Object Consolidation, Washington, DC, pp. 13–18 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bilenko, M., Mooney, R.J.: Learning to combine trained distance metrics for duplicate detection in databases. Technical Report AI 02-296, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ristad, E.S., Yianilos, P.N.: Learning string-edit distance. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20, 522–532 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen, W.W., Richman, J.: Learning to match and cluster large high-dimensional data sets for data integration. In: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2002), Edmonton, Alberta (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sarawagi, S., Bhamidipaty, A.: Interactive deduplication using active learning. In: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2002), Edmonton, Alberta (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ananthakrishna, R., Chaudhuri, S., Ganti, V.: Eliminating fuzzy duplicates in data warehouses. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases(VLDB 2002) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pasula, H., Marthi, B., Milch, B., Russell, S., Shpitser, I.: Identity uncertainty and citation matching. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 15. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bhattacharya, I., Getoor, L.: Deduplication and group detection using links. In: Proceedings of the KDD 2004 Workshop on Link Analysis and Group Detection (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Domingos, P., Domingos, P.: Multi-relational record linkage. In: Proceedings of the KDD 2004 Workshop on Multi-Relational Data Mining, pp. 31–48 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fellegi, I.P., Sunter, A.B.: A theory for record linkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association 64, 1183–1210 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Newcombe, H.B., Kennedy, J.M., Axford, S.J., James, A.P.: Automatic linkage of vital records. Science 130, 954–959 (1959)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Winkler, W.E.: Using the em algorithm for weight computation in the fellegi-sunter model of record linkage. In: Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, pp. 667–671 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Winkler, W.E.: Improved decision rules in the fellegi-sunter model of record linkage. In: Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, pp. 274–279 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Larsen, M.D., Rubin, D.B.: Alternative automated record linkage using mixture models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79, 32–41 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Winkler, W.E.: The state of record linkage and current research problems. Technical report, Statistical Research Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ravikumar, P., Cohen, W.W.: A hierarchical graphical model for record linkage. In: AUAI 2004: Proceedings of the 20th conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence, pp. 454–461. AUAI Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lehti, P., Fankhauser, P.: A precise blocking method for record linkage. In: Tjoa, A.M., Trujillo, J. (eds.) DaWaK 2005. LNCS, vol. 3589, pp. 210–220. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Sachs, L.: Angewandte Statistik, pp. 434–435. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Baeza-Yates, R., Ribiero-Neto, B.: Modern Information Retrieval, pp. 74–79. Addison Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Levenshtein, V.I.: Binary codes capable of correcting insertions and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady 10, 707–710 (1966)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Elfeky, M.G., Verykios, V.S., Elmargarid, A.K.: Tailor: A record linkage toolbox. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lehti, P., Fankhauser, P. (2005). Probabilistic Iterative Duplicate Detection. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2005: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE. OTM 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3761. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11575801_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11575801_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29738-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32120-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics