Skip to main content

A Redundancy Analysis of Sequent Proofs

  • Conference paper
Book cover Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods (TABLEAUX 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3702))

  • 382 Accesses

Abstract

Proof search often involves a choice between alternatives which may result in redundant information once the search is complete. This behavior can manifest itself in proof search for sequent systems by the presence of redundant formulae or subformulae in a sequent for which a proof has been found. In this paper we investigate the detection and elimination of redundant parts of a provable sequent by using labels and Boolean constraints to keep track of usage information. We illustrate our ideas in propositional linear logic, but we believe the general approach is applicable to a variety of sequent systems, including other resource-sensitive logics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cervesato, I., Hodas, J., Pfenning, F.: Efficient Resource Management for Linear Logic Proof Search. In: Herre, H., Dyckhoff, R., Schroeder-Heister, P. (eds.) ELP 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1050, pp. 67–82. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Galmiche, D., Méry, D.: Resource Graphs and Countermodels in Resource Logics. In: Proceedings of the IJCAR 2004 Workshop on disproving: Non-Theorems, Non-Validity, Non-Provability, Cork, Ireland, pp. 59–75 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Galmiche, D., Perrier, G.: On Proof Normalisation in Linear Logic. Theoretical Computer Science 135, 67–110 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Harland, J.: An Algebraic Approach to Proof Search in Sequent Calculi. Short paper presented at the International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning, Siena (July 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harland, J., Pym, D.: Resource-distribution via Boolean constraints. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 4(1), 56–90 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Hodas, J., Lopez, P., Polakow, J., Stoilova, L., Pimentel, E.: A Tag-Frame System of Resource Management for Proof Search in Linear Logic Programming. In: Bradfield, J.C. (ed.) CSL 2002 and EACSL 2002, vol. 2471, pp. 167–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Lopez, P., et al.: Isolating Resource Consumption in Linear Logic Proof Search (extended abstract). Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 70(2) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lutovac, T., Harland, J.: Issues in the Analysis of Proof-search Strategies in Sequential Presentations of Logics. In: Basin, D., Rusinowitch, M. (eds.) IJCAR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3097, pp. 115–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Massacci, F.: Efficient Approximate Deduction and an Application to Computer Security, PhD thesis, Università degeli Studi di Roma ’La Sapienza’ (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marriot, K., Stuckey, P.: Programming with Constraints. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pfenning, F., Schürmann, C.: Twelf — a meta-logical framework for deductive systems. In: Ganzinger, H. (ed.) CADE 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1632, pp. 202–206. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Polakov, J.: Linear Logic Programming with an Ordered Context. In: Proceedings of the Second International ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming (PPDP 2000), Montreal, pp. 68–79 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Polakov, J.: Linearity Constraints as Bounded Intervals in Linear Logic Programming. In: Galmiche, D., Pym, D., O’Hearn, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the LICS 2004 Workshop on Logic for Resources, Process and Programs (LRPP), pp. 173–182 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schmitt, S., Kreitz, C.: Deleting Redundancy in Proof Reconstruction. In: de Swart, H. (ed.) TABLEAUX 1998. LNCS, vol. 1397, pp. 262–277. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Wallen, L.: Automated Proof Search in Non-classical Logic. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Winikoff, M., Harland, J.: Implementing the Linear Logic Programming Language Lygon. In: Proceedings of the International Logic Programming Symposium, Portland, December 1995, pp. 66–80 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lutovac, T., Harland, J. (2005). A Redundancy Analysis of Sequent Proofs. In: Beckert, B. (eds) Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods. TABLEAUX 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3702. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11554554_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11554554_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28931-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31822-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics