This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abrahamsen, E.P. & Shelton, K.C. (1989). Reading comprehension in adolescents with learning disabilities: Semantic and syntactic effects. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 570–572.
Alon, A. & Goldenberg, D. (1998). The connector ‘kaasher’ (when) and its function in Israeli Hebrew. In Helkat Lashon v. 26, p. 15–25. (in Hebrew).
Azar, M. (1985). ‘Aval’, ‘ella’ and ‘ella she’ (different uses of ‘but’) in modern Hebrew. Leshonenu, v. 35, 133–148. (in Hebrew).
Baker, L. (1985). Difference in the standards used by college students to relate their comprehension of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(3), 279–313.
Bauman, J.F. & Stevenson, J.A. (1986). Identifying types of anaphoric relationships. In J.W. Irwin (Ed.), Cohesion comprehension. International Reading Association, Inc.
Bentin, S., Deutsch, A., & Liberman, I.Y. (1990). Syntactic competence and reading ability in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 147–172.
Berman, R. & Kemp, J. (1986). The HALP test for academic, language proficiency in Hebrew as the mother tongue (Tel Aviv University).
Burstein, R. (1996). Students’ difficulties in perceiving the meaning of polisemic and other logical connectors and others. Mixlala, Mexkar, Yiun ve-Yitzira, 8, 75–87 (in Hebrew).
Celce-Murcia, M. & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The Grammar Book. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Cohen, A. (1994). Context, meaning, word acquisition and reading comprehension. Helkat Lashon, 14, 14–25 (in Hebrew).
Dar, Y., Rash, N. & Erhard, R. (1989). Academic achievements in science and reading comprehension in Junior High-Schools. The NCJW Institute for Innovation in Education, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem (in Hebrew).
Erlich, M.F. (1999). Processing of anaphoric devices. Reading and Writing, 11(1), 26–63.
Gaux, C. & Gombert, J. E. (1999). Implicit and explicit syntactic knowledge and reading in pre-adolescents. Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(170), 169–188.
Goldman, S.R. & Murray, J. D. (1992). Knowledge of connectors as cohesion devices in text: A comparative study of native-English and English as a second language speakers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 504–519.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hasan, R. (1984). Coherence and cohesion harmony. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension (pp. 181–219). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Horning, S.A. (1993). The psycholinguistics of readable writing. A multidisciplinary exploration. NJ: Albex Publishers, Norwood.
Irwin, J.W. (1986). Cohesion, coherence, and comprehension. In J. W. Irwin, Understanding and teaching cohesion comprehension (pp. 3–8). Newark, DE: International Reading Association, Inc.
Irwin, J.W. (1991). Teaching matacognitive processes. Chapter 6. In J.W. Irwin, Teaching reading comprehension processes. Englewood Cliffs: NJ, Prentic-Hall Inc.
Geva, E. & Ryan, E.B. (1985). Use of conjunctions in expository texts by skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Reading Behavior. 27(4), 331–346.
Grabe, W. & Stoller, F.L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. London: Pearson Education.
Knott, A. & Sanders, T. (1998). The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 135–175.
Kress, G. (1994). Linguistic and conceptual development: conjoined and sentence structure. In G. Kress (Ed.), Learning to write (pp. 127–157). London: Routledge.
Kress. G. & Rowan, M. (1994). The expression of causality in children’s language. In G. Kress (Ed.), Learning to write (pp. 158–178). London: Routledge.
MacLean, M. & Chapman, L. J. (1989). The processing of cohesion in fiction and non-fiction by good and poor readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 12(1), 13–28.
Martin, J.R. (1989). Types of exposition: ‘persuading that’ and ‘persuading to’. In Factual writing exploring and challenging social reality (pp. 16–27), Oxford University Press
McClure, E.F. & Geva, E. (1983). The development of the cohesive use of adversative conjunctions in discourse. Discourse Processes, 6, 411–432.
McIntyre, E. (1995). Teaching and learning writing skills in a low-SES urban primary classroom. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27(2), 215–242.
Nippold, M.A. (1988). The literate lexicon. In M.A. Nippold (Ed.), Later language development (pp. 29–48), Pro-Ed Inc., Austin, TX.
Nir, R. (1997). Hebrew vocabulary and its place in Hebrew language teaching. Mixlala, Mexkar, Yiun ve-Yitzira 5, p. 13–25 (in Hebrew).
Olshtain, E. & Cohen, E. (2000). Cohesion in instructional texts. In Schwarzwald, R.O., Blum-Kulka & Olshtain, E. (Eds.), Raphael Nir Jubilee book: Studies in communication, linguistics and language teaching. Carmel publishers, Jerusalem (in Hebrew).
Olson, D.R. & Astington, J.W. (1986). Children’s acquisition of metalinguistic and metacognitive verbs. In W. Demopoulos & A. Marras (Eds.), Language learning and concept acquisition: Foundational issues (pp. 184–199), Norwood, NJ: Albex.
Richgels, D.J., Mcgee, L.M., Lomax, R.G. & Sheard, C. (1987). Awareness of four text structure: Effects on recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 22,(2) 177–193.
Roehler, L.R., Duffy, G.D. & Meloth, M. (1986). What to be direct about in direct instruction in reading. In T. Raphael & R. Reynolds (Eds.), Context for school-based literacy (pp. 79–96). NY: Random House.
Sanders, T.J.M., Spooren, W.P.M. & Noordman, L.G.M. (1992). Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 15, 1–35.
Sarel, Z. (1991). Introduction to discourse analysis. Tel-Aviv: Or-Am, Publishers, (in Hebrew).
Singer, M. (1993). Global inferences of text situations. Discourse Processes, 16, 161–168.
Storey, P. (1997). Examining the test-taking process: A cognitive perspective on the discourse cloze test. Language Testing, 14, 214–231.
Tobin, Y.C. & Apheck, E. (1985). Analysis of function words which cause problem in Hebrew as a FL. In J.M. Ulijn & A.K. Pugh (Eds.), Reading for professional purposes (pp. 90–99). Leuven: Academic Publishing Cooperation.
Tummer, W.E., Herriman, M.L. & Nesdale, A.R. (1988). Meta-linguistics abilities and reading acquisition. British Journal of Development Psychology, 5, 25–34.
Van Den Broek, P., Fletcher, C.R., & Risden, K. (1993). Investigations of inferential processes in reading: A theoretical and methodological integration. Discourse Processes, 16, 169–180.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1977b). Text and context-Exploration in the semantic and pragmatics of discourse. New York: Longman Inc.
Van Dijk, T.A. & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
Weaver, P. A. (1979). Improving reading comprehension: effects of sentence organization instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 15(1), 129–145.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Olshtain, E., Cohen, E. (2005). Logical Connectors in Hebrew: How Well Do Eighth-Graders Master Them?. In: Ravid, D.D., Shyldkrot, H.BZ. (eds) Perspectives on Language and Language Development. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7911-7_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7911-7_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7903-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-7911-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)