Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Environment & Policy ((ENPO,volume 45))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aurelia! (2002), Market of meat substitutes in the Netherlands (Vleesvervangers in Nederland 2002, in Dutch), Aurelia!, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beardsworth, A., and Keil, T. (1997), Sociology on the menu: An invitation to the study of food and society, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, J.E., and Rogers, P.J. (1991), “Satiating power of food”, Encyclopedia of Human Biology, Vol. 6, pp. 723–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardello, A.V., and Schutz, H.G. (1996), “Food appropriateness measures as an adjunct to consumer preference/acceptability evaluation”, Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 7, pp. 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll-Burke, P. (2001), “Tools, instruments and engines: Getting a handle on the specificity of engine science”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 31, pp. 593–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A.I.A., Dekker, M., and Jongen, W.M.F. (2001), “Quality function deployment in the food industry: A review”, Trends in Food Science and Technology, Vol. 11, pp. 306–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J., and Lightowler, H. (1998), “Plant-based alternatives to meat”, Nutrition and Food Science, Vol. 2/3, pp. 90–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, J. (2004), “A psychological view on industrial transformation and behaviour”, in Olsthoorn, A.A., and Wieczorek, A.J. (Eds.), Sciences for industrial transformation: Views from different disciplines, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1978), The civilizing process. I. The history of manners, Basil Blackwell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flandrin, J.L. (1999), “Dietary choices and culinary technique, 1500–1800”, in Flandrin, J.L., Montanari, M., and Sonnenfeld, A. (Eds.), Food: A culinary history from antiquity to the present, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 403–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J.A. (2005), “Efflorescences and economic growth in world history: Rethinking the “Rise of the West” and the Industrial Revolution”, Journal of World History, Vol. 13, pp. 323–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum, T.L. (1998), The practical handbook and guide to focus group research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunert, K.G., Brunsø, K., and Bisp, S. (1997), “Food-related life-style: Development of a cross-culturally valid instrument for market surveillance”, in Kahle, L., and Chiagouris, C. (Eds.), Values, lifestyles and psychographics, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 337–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek, A.C., Luning, P.A., Stafleu, A., and De Graaf, C. (2004), “Food-related lifestyle and health attitudes of Dutch vegetarians, non-vegetarian consumers of meat substitutes, and meat consumers”, Appetite, Vol. 42, pp. 265–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogland, C.T., De Boer, J., and Boersema, J.J. (2005), “Transparency of the meat chain in the light of food culture and history”, Appetite, Vol. 45, pp. 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, V.J. (1997), “The democratization of meat and protein in late eighteenth-and nineteenth-century Europe”, Historian, pp. 541–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Saunders, J., and Wong, V. (1999), Principles of marketing, second European edition, Prentice Hall Europe, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R.A., and Casey, M.A. (1988), Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. (2001), At the dawn of modernity: Biology, culture, and material life in Europe after the year 1000, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman, M., and Väänänen, M. (2000), “Measurement of ethical food choice motives”, Appetite, Vol. 34, pp. 55–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McIlveen, H., Abraham, C., and Armstrong, G. (1999), “Meat avoidance and the role of replacers”, Nutrition and Food Science, Vol. 99, pp. 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meiselman, H.L., Johnson, J.L., Reeve, W., and Crouch, J.E. (2000), “Demonstrations of the influence of the eating environment on food acceptance”, Appetite, Vol. 35, pp. 231–237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pliner, P., and Hobden, K. (1992), “Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans”, Appetite, Vol. 19, pp. 105–120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • PVE (2003), Market research 2002: Meat, figures and trends (Marktverkenning 2002: Vlees, cijfers en trends, in Dutch), Product Boards for Livestock, Meat and Eggs, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., and Mervis, C.B. (1975), “Family resemblances: Studies on the internal structure of categories”, Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 14, pp. 573–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, A.J. (1999), Food texture: Measurement and perception, Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg, ML.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., and Tuorila, H. (1993), “Simultaneous and temporal contextual influences on food acceptance”, Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 4, pp. 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schifferstein, H.N.J., and Oude Ophuis, P.A.M. (1998), “Health-related determinants of organic food consumption in the Netherlands”, Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 9, pp. 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, H.G. (1994), “Appropriateness as a measure of the cognitive-contextual aspects of food acceptance”, in MacFie, H.J.H., and Thomson, D.M.H. (Eds.), Chapman & Hall, Glasgow, UK, pp. 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, H.G., and Pilgrim, F.J. (1958), “A field study of monotony”, Psychological Reports, Vol. 47, pp. 559–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, R. (1989), “Factors influencing food preferences and choice”, in Shepherd, R. (Ed.), Handbook of the psychophysiology of human eating, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, P.S., and Pilgrim, F.J. (1958), “The effect of monotony on the acceptance of food”, American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 71, pp. 756–759.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsma, L., Rabenberg, M., Janssens, R., and Linnemann, A.R. (1996), Sensory aspects of Novel Protein Foods (Sensorische aspecten van Novel Protein Foods, in Dutch), DTO werkdocument VN13, Delft, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallberg-White, C., and Pliner, P. (1999), “The effect of flavor principles on willingness to taste novel foods”, Appetite, Vol. 33, pp. 209–221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, P.N. (2001), Consumerism in world history: The global transformation of desire, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steptoe, A., Pollard, T., and Wardle, J. (1995), “Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: The food choice questionnaire”, Appetite, Vol. 25, pp. 267–284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, H., Sidel, J., Oliver, S., Woolsey, A., and Singleton, R.C. (1974), “Sensory evaluation by quantitative descriptive analysis”, Food Technology, Vol. 28, pp. 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. (1983), Man and the natural world, changing attitudes in England (1500–1800), Allan Lane/Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M., and Collison, R. (1988), “Consumer acceptance of meals and meal components”, Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 1, pp. 21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Trijp, J.C.M., and Steenkamp, J.E.B.M. (1998), “Consumer-oriented new product development: Principles and practice”, in Jongen, W.M.F., and Meulenberg, M.T.G. (Eds.), Innovation of food production systems: Product quality and consumer acceptance, Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, pp. 37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vialles, N. (1994), Animal to edible, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warde, A. (1997), Consumption, food and taste: Culinary antinomies and commodity culture, SAGE, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. (1995), Sensemaking in organizations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zandstra, E.H., Weegels, M.F., Van Spronsen, A.A., and Klerk, M. (2004), “Scoring or boring? Predicting boredom through repeated in-home consumption”, Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 15, pp. 549–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Boer, J., Hoek, A., Elzerman, H. (2006). Social Desirability: Consumer Aspects. In: Aiking, H., de Boer, J., Vereijken, J. (eds) Sustainable Protein Production and Consumption: Pigs or Peas?. Environment & Policy, vol 45. Springer, Dordrecht . https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4842-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics