Skip to main content

Pleonasm and hypercharacterisation

  • Chapter
Book cover Yearbook of Morphology 2005

Part of the book series: Yearbook of Morphology ((YOMO))

I thank Giorgio Banti, Dagmar Haumann, Johannes Helmbrecht, Nils Jahn, Yoko Nishina, Su-Rin Ryu and two anonymous reviewers of the Yearbook of Morphology for helpful comments on the first draft and for a couple of examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bloomer, Robert K. (1996). Die pleonastischen Zusammensetzungen der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 8, 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booij, Geert (2005a). The Grammar of Words. An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, Geert (2005b). Paradigmatic morphology. In Bernard Tranel and Georgette Dal (eds.), Hommage a Danielle Corbin. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cennamo, Michela (1999). Late Latin pleonastic reflexives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Transactions of the Philological Society 97(1), 103–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Yuen Ren (1968). A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coseriu, Eugenio (1958). Sincronía, diacronía e historia. El problema del cambio lingüístico. Montevideo: Universidad de la República de Uruguay, Faculdad de Humanidades y Ciencias (Repr.: Madrid: Gredos, 1973.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. (2004). Hypercharacterisation and productivity in inflectional morphology. In Thomas Krisch, Thomas Lindner and Ulrich Müller (eds.), Analecta homini universali dicata. Arbeiten zur Indogermanistik, Linguistik, Philologie, Politik, Musik und Dichtung. Festschrift für Oswald Panagl zum 65. Geburtstag. 2 Bde. Stuttgart: H.-D. Heinz (Stuttgarter Arbeiten zur Germanistik, 421); 2, 515–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U., Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kolaczyk, and Rossella Spina (2001). Sources of markedness in language structures. Folia Linguistica Historica 22, 103–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer, Wolfgang (1971). Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: M. Niemeyer (2. unveränd. Aufl.; 1.: Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haiman, John (1985). Natural Syntax. Iconicity and Erosion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, Martin (1993). The diachronic externalization of inflection. Linguistics 31, 279–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, Roman (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; New York: Wiley, 350–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaunisto, Mark (1999). Electric/electrical and classic/classical: Variation between the suffixes -ic and -ical. English Studies 80, 343–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knobloch, Clemens (2002). Zwischen Satz-Nominalisierung und Nennderivation: -unq-Nomina in Deutschen. Sprachwissenschaft 27, 333–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koefoed, Geert and Jaap van Marle (2004). Fundamental concepts [of morphological change]. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan and Stavros Skopeteas (eds.), Morphologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung. 2. Halbband. Berlin: W. de Gruyter (HandbÜcher zÜr Sprach-und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 17.2); 1574–1589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lausberg, Heinrich (1990). Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik. Eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft. Stuttgart: F. Steiner (3rd edn.=repr. of the 2nd., enl. edn. 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Christian (1982). Universal and typological aspects of agreement. In Hansjakob Seiler and Franz Josef Stachowiak (eds.), Apprehension. Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen. Teil II: Die Techniken und ihr Zusammenhang in den Einzelsprachen. Tübingen: G. Narr (LUS, 1, II); 201–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Christian (2002). Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Erfurt: Seminar fÜr Sprachwissenschaft der Universität (ASSidUE, 9) (2. revised edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfstedt, Einar (1933). Wortform, Wortumfang und Verwandtes. In Einar Löfstedt, Syntactica. Studien und Beiträge zur historischen Syntax des Lateins. Zweiter Teil: Syntaktischstilistische Gesichtspunkte und Probleme. Lund etc.: Gleerup (Acta Reg. Societatis Humaniorum Litterarum Lundensis, X:2); 35–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkiel, Yakov (1957f). Diachronic hypercharacterization in Romance. Archivum linguisticum 9, 79–113; 10, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, Alec and Caroline Wiltshire (2000). Reduplication. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann and Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung. 1. Halbband. Berlin: W. de Gruyter (HandbÜcher zÜr Sprach-und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 17.1); 557–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, Albert (1999). Affix repetition and non-redundancy in inflectional morphology. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18, 76–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Hermann (1920). Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: M. Niemeyer (5th edn.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plag, Ingo (2005). Syntactic category information and the semantics of derivational morphological rules. Folia Linguistica 38, 195–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plank, Frans (1981). Morphologische (Ir-) Regularitäten. Aspekte der Wortstrukturtheorie. Tübingen: G. Narr (Studien zur deutschen Grammatik, 13).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusakova, Marina V. (2004). Russian diminutive/hypocoristic adjectives: Between inflection and derivation. 11th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, 14–17 February 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherer, Tim D. (1994). Prosodic phonotactics, PhD dissertation. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolz, Thomas (2004). Pleonastic morphology dies hard. Evidence from Lithuanian and sundry languages. 11th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, 14–17 February 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lehmann, C. (2005). Pleonasm and hypercharacterisation. In: Booij, G., Van Marle, J. (eds) Yearbook of Morphology 2005. Yearbook of Morphology. Springer, Dordrecht . https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4066-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics