Skip to main content

From Paper to Practice: Two Reforms and Their Consequences in Dutch Higher Education

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Higher Education Dynamics ((HEDY,volume 8))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acherman, H.A. “Quality Assessment in a European Perspective.” Paper presented at the EAIR Forum, Bergen, 15–17 August, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P.G. and S. Slaughter (eds). The Academic Profession. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardach, E. The Implementation Game. What Happens After a Bill Becomes a Law. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, J. “Dawkins’ Higher Education Reforms and How Metaphors Work in Policy Making.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 24.1 (2002): 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, R. De logica van het social. Een inleiding tot het sociologisch denken. Alphen aan den Rijn/Brussel: Samsom Uitgeverij, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerych, L. and P. Sabatier. Great Expectations and Mixed Performance. Implementation of Higher Education Reforms in Europe. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. “A Rational Choice Perspective on Economic Sociology.” In Smelser, N.J. and R. Swedberg (eds). The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton/New York: University Press/Russell Sage Foundation, 1994, 166–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commissie Datema. De kanteling van het universitaire bestuur (rapport van de commissie Klankbordgroep Invoering MUB). Zoetermeer: Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuuren Wetenschappen, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commissie-Rinnooy Kan. Advies inzake de invoering van een bachelor-master system in het Nederlandse hoger onderwijs (20000417/528). ‘s-Gravenhage: Onderwijsraad, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee Accreditation of Dutch Higher Education. Activate, Achieve and Advance: Final Report. Amsterdam: Van de Bunt, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J., R. DeAngelis, H. de Boer, J. Huisman and C. Lacotte. Globalizing Practices and University Responses. European and Anglo-American Differences. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, H. “Institutionele analyse en professionele autonomie. Een empirisch-verklarende studied naar de doorwerking van de wet ‘Modemisering Universitaire Bestuursorganisatie’ (MUB).” (dissertatie). Enschede: CHEPS, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, H. and B. Denters. “Analysis of Institutions of University Governance: A Classification Scheme Applied to Postwar Changes in Dutch Higher Education.” In Jongbloed, B., P. Maassen and G. Neave (eds). From the Eye of the Storm. Higher Education’s Changing Institution. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999, 211–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, H., B. Denters and L. Goedegebuure. “On Boards and Councils; Shaky Balances Considered. The Governance of Dutch Universities.” Higher Education Policy 11.2/3 (1998): 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, H., B. Denters and L. Goedegebuure. “Dutch Disease or Dutch Model? An Evaluation of the pre-1998 System of Democratic University Government in the Netherlands.” In Weissberg, R. (ed.). Democracy and the Academy. Huntington, NY: Nova Science Publishers, 2000, 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vree, J.K. Foundations of Social and Political Processes: The Dynamics of Human Behaviour, Politics, and Society. Bilthoven, NL: Prime Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J. Governing the Academic Commons. About Blurring Boundaries, Blistering Organisations, and Growing Demands. Inaugural Lecture. Enschede: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies, University of Twente, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J., L. Goedegebuure and P. Maassen. Governance Shifts and Policy Implementation in Higher Education: A European Bird’s-Eye View. Enschede: CHEPS, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiks, M.M.H. Beslissen over kwaliteit. Utrecht: De tijdstroom, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiks, M.M.H., D.F. Westerheijden and P.J.M. Weusthof. “Effects of Quality Assessment in Dutch Higher Education.” European Journal of Education 29 (1994): 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geul, A. Beleid in uitvoering. Problemen en remedies. Utrecht: Uitgeverij Lemma, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedegebuure, L.C.J., M. Jeliazkova, F. Pothof and P.J.M. Weusthof. Alle begin is moeilijk: Evaluatie van deproefaccreditering HBO. Enschede: CHEPS, Universiteit Twente, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å., S. Kyvik and B. Stensaker. “Implementation Analysis in Higher Education.” In Smart, John C. (ed.). Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. XVII. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002, 381–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P. and P. ‘t Hart. Public Policy Disasters in Western Europe. London/New York: Routledge, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grondsma, T. TVC-proces en speltheorie. Delft: Technische Hogeschool Delft, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herweyer, M. “De dynamiek an doelstellend gedrag: een struikelblok voor evaluatieonderzoek.” In Lehning, P.B. and J.B.D. Simonis (eds). Handboek beleidswetenschap. Meppel/Amsterdam: Boom, 1987, 177–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huitema, D., M. Jeliazkova and D.F. Westerheijden. “Phases, Levels and Circles in Policy Development: The Cases of Higher Education and Environmental Quality Assurance.” Higher Education Policy 15.2 (2002): 197–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inspectie Hoger Onderwijs. De bestuurlijke hantering van de externe kwaliteitszorg 1989 in het wetenschappelijk onderwijs. De Meem: Inspectie Hoger Onderwijs, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeliazkova, M. and D.F. Westerheijden. Het zichtbare eindresultaat. Den Haag: Algemene Rekenkamer, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeliazkova, M. and D.F. Westerheijden. “Systemic Adaptation to a Changing Environment: Towards a Next Generation of Quality Assurance Models.” Higher Education 44.3/4 (2002): 433–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiser, L.L. and E. Ostrom. “The Three Worlds of Action.” In Ostrom, E. (ed.). Strategies of Political Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1982, 179–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieshout, R.H. and J.K. de Vree. “How Organisations Decide.” Acta Politica XX (1985): 129–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. Street-level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maassen, P.A.M. and F.A. van Vught. “Alternative Models of Governmental Steering in Higher Education.” In Goedegebuure, L.C.J. and F.A. van Vught (eds). Comparative Policy Studies in Higher Education. Enschede/Utrecht: CHEPS and LEMMA, 1994, 35–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. New Challenges to Governance Theory. European University Institute. Jean Monet Chair Paper, RSC No. 98/50, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerie van Onderwijs and Wetenschappen. Hoger Onderwijs: Autonomie en Kwaliteit. Tweede Kamer, vergaderjaar 1985–1986, 19253, nr. 2, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A.J. “The Validity and Reliability of Evaluation of Scholarly Performance.” In Van Raan, A.F.J. (ed.). Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1988, 193–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, L.J. “Implementing Public Programs.” In Perry, J.L. (ed.). Handbook of Public Administration. 2nd edn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1996, 250–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prottas, J.M. People-processing. The Street-level Bureaucrat in Public Service Bureaucracies. Toronto: Lexington, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, N. “A Comparison of Three Approaches to Programme Implementation.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 9.4 (1996): 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, N. “Rationality and Implementation Analysis.” Journal of Management History 5.1 (1999): 36–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. “What Can We Learn From Implementation Research?” In Kaufnann, F.X., G. Majone and V. Ostrom (eds). Guidance, Control, and Evaluation in the Public Sector. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1986, 313–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. “Policy Failure and Institutional Reform: Why Should Form Follow Function?” International Social Science Journal 108 (1986): 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. Games Real Actors Play. Actor-centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, T.A.P. “Implementation Theory and Practice: Uncovering Policy and Administration Linkages in the 1990s.” International Journal of Public Administration 24.1 (2001): 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaapen, J.B., A.A.M. Prins, C.A.M. van Suyt and S.S. Blume. De Voorwaardelijke Financiering de maat genomen. Amsterdam: UvA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaapen, J.B., C.A.M. van Suyt, A.A.M. Prins and S.S. Blume. De moeizame relative tussen beleid en onderzoek: Evaluatie van viff jaar Voorwaardelijke Financiering. Zoetermeer: Ministerie van Onderwijs and Wetenschappen, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokman, F.N., R. Popping and R. Missoorten. “Een relationele database voor wetenschappelijke productive ” U and H 35 (1989): 231–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trader-Leigh, K.E. “Case Study: Identifying Resistance in Managing Change.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 15.2 (2002): 138–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bruggen, J.C., J.P. Scheele and D.F. Westerheijden. “To be continued … Syntheses and trends.” In Scheele, J.P., P.A.M. Maassen and D.F. Westerheijden (eds). To Be Continued …: Follow-Up of Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Maarssen: Elsevier/De Tijdstroom, 1998, 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meulen, B.R., D.F. Westerheijden, A. Rip and F.A. van Vught. Verkenningscommissies tussen veld en overhead. Zoetermeer: Ministerie van Onderwijs and Wetenschappen, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vegt, R., L.F. Smyth and R. Vandenberghe. “Implementing Educational Policy at the School Level. Organization Dynamics and Teacher Concerns.” Journal of Educational Administration 39.1 (2000): 8–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wende, M.C. and D.F. Westerheijden. “International Aspects of Quality Assurance With a Special Focus on European Higher Education.” Quality in Higher Education 7.3 (2001): 233–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A.F.J., A.J. Nederhof and H.F. Moed. Science and Technology Indicators: Their Use in Science Policy and Their Role in Scientific Studies — Select Proceedings. Leiden: LISBON, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vught, F.A. (ed.). Governmental Strategies and Innovation in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vught, F.A., M.C. van der Wende and D.F. Westerheijden. “Globalization and Internationalization: Policy Agendas Compared.” In Fulton, O. and J. Enders (eds). Higher Education in a Globalizing World. International Trends and Mutual Observations. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002, 103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vught, F.A. and D.F. Westerheijden. Quality Management and Quality Assurance in European Higher Education: Methods and Mechanisms. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the Commission of the European Communities, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroeijenstijn, A.I. “Autonomy and Assurance of Quality: Two Sides of One Coin.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Assessing Quality in Higher Education, Cambridge, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerheijden, D.F. “Quality Assessment in Dutch Higher Education: Balancing Improvement and Accountability.” European Journal for Education Law and Policy 1 (1997a): 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerheijden, D.F. “A Solid Base for Decisions: Use of the VSNU Research Evaluations in Dutch Universities.” Higher Education 33.4 (1997b): 397–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerheijden, D.F. “Ex oriented lux? National and Multiple Accreditation in Europe After the Fall of the Wall and After Bologna.” Quality in Higher Education 7.1 (2001): 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerheijden, D.F. and M. Leegwater (eds). Working on the European Dimension of Quality: Report of the Conference on Quality Assurance in Higher Education as Part of the Bologna Process, Amsterdam, 12–13 March 2002. Zoetermeer: Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschappen, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wippler, R. “De plaats van roltheoretische ideeën in de sociologie.” In Visser, A.P., E. van der Vliert, E.J.H. ter Heine and J.A.M. Winnubst (eds). Rollen; Persoonlijke en social invloeden op het gedrag. Amsterdam/Meppel: Boom, 1983, 61–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Boer, H.F., Enders, J., Westerheijden, D.F. (2005). From Paper to Practice: Two Reforms and Their Consequences in Dutch Higher Education. In: Gornitzka, Å., Kogan, M., Amaral, A. (eds) Reform and Change in Higher Education. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3411-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics