Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methodological Considerations in Prevention Research

  • Chapter
Book cover Handbook of Drug Abuse Prevention

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

This chapter discussed a number of methodological considerations that face prevention research. It examined the central importance of theory in design and analysis of prevention studies. It considered the role of factorial invariance in developing culture-specific measures. It discussed the importance of statistical power and how it is dependent on factors other than sample size. It considered growth curve models, survival analysis, and lta, all relatively new procedures for dealing with change over time. It also discussed two approaches to the trait-state distinction and looked at missing data procedures and how important they are for prevention research. Finally, it discussed two general types of models that frequently arise in prevention research, mediation models and models of reciprocal causation, and how the customary ways of testing these models should perhaps be reconsidered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, 1–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacik, J. M., Murphy, S. A., & Anthony, J. C. (in press). Drug use prevention data, missing assessments and survival analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 573–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M, & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1987). Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi-trait multi-method matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. M. (1994). Some design, measurement, and analysis pitfalls in drug abuse prevention research and how to avoid them: Let your model be your guide. In A. Cazares & L. A. Beatty (Eds.), Scientific methods for prevention intervention research. National Institutes of Health: National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph 139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. M. (1996). Measurement of change in research on aging: Old and new issues from an individual growth perspective. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging, Fourth edition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. M., & Cliff, N. (1990). Using the Longitudinal Guttman Simplex as a basis for measuring growth. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 128–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. M., Graham, J. W., & Flaherty, B. P. (1998). An alternative framework for defining mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. M., Graham, J. W., Rousculp, S. S., & Hansen, W. B. (1997). Heavy caffeine and the beginning of the substance use onset process: An illustration of latent transition analysis. In K. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 79–99). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. M., & Wugalter, S. E. (1992). Latent class models for stage-sequential dynamic latent variables. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 131–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. M., & Sayer, A. G. (2000). Modeling growth and change processes: Design, measurement, and analysis for research in social psychology. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Social Psychology (pp. 478–495). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, W. R. (1991). Issues in factorial invariance. In L. M. Collins & J. L. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P. J., Harford, T., & Muthen, B. (1997). The relation between heavy alcohol use and bar patronage: A latent growth model. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 57, 410–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, S. I., Graham, J. W., & Hansen, W. B. (1994). Testing the generalizability of intervening mechanism theories: Understanding the effects of adolescent drug use prevention interventions. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 17, 195–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumenci, L., & Windle, M. (1996). A latent trait-state model of adolescent depression using the center for epidemiologic studes-depression scale. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. C., & Duncan, T. E. (1996). A multivariate latent growth curve analysis of adolescent substance use. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 323–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Alpert, A., Hops, H., Stoolmiller, M., & Muthen, B. (1991). Latent variable modeling of longitudinal and multilevel substance use data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 275–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. C., Duncan, T. E., Biglan, A., & Ary, D. (1998). Contributions of the social context to the development of adolescent substance use: A multivariate latent growth modeling approach. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 50, 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. C., Duncan, T. E., & Hops, H. (1996). Analysis of longitudinal data within accelerated longitudinal designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 236–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S. E. (1991a). A multidimensional latent trait model for measuring learning and change. Psychometrika, 56, 495–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S. E. (1991b). Implications of a multidimensional latent trait model for measuring change. In L. M. Collins & J. L. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. F., West, S. G., & Mackinnon, D. P. (1998). Effects of sample size and nonnormality on the estimation of mediated effects in latent variable models. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. H., & Ponocny, I. (1994). An extension of the partial credit model with an application to the measurement of change. Psychometrika, 59, 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty, B. P. (1997). Assessing stage-sequential reciprocal influence with latent transition analysis. Unpublished master’s thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridhandler, B. M. (1986). Conceptual note on state, trait and the state-trait distinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 169–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W., Collins, L. M., Wugalter, S. E., Chung, N. K., & Hansen, W. B. (1991). Modeling transitions in latent stage-sequential processes: A substance use prevention example. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W., & Hofer, S. M. (2000). Multiple imputation in multivariate research. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multiple-group data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (pp. 201–218). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W., Hofer, S. M., Donaldson, S. I., MacKinnon, D. P., & Schafer, J. L. (1996). Analysis with missing data in prevention research. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 325–365). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, W. B., & Collins, L. M. (1994). Seven ways to increase power without increasing N. In L. M. Collins & L. A. Seitz (Eds.), Advances in data analysis for prevention intervention research. National Institutes of Health: National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph 142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, W. B., & Graham, J. W. (1991). Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: Peer pressure resistance training versus establishing conservative norms. Preventive Medicine, 20, 414–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, W. B., Graham, J. W., Wolkenstein, B. H., Lundy, B. Z., Pearson, J. L., Flay, B. R., & Johnson, C. A. (1988). Differential impact of three alcohol prevention curricula on hypothesized mediating variables. Journal of Drug Education, 18, 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. D., Graham, J. W., Maguin, E., Abbott, R., Hill, K. G., & Catalano, R. F. (1997). Exploring the effects of age of alcohol use initiation and psychosocial risk factors on subsequent alcohol misuse. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58, 280–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L. (1991). Comment on issues in factorial invariance. In L. M. Collins & J. L. Horn (Eds.), Best Methods for the analysis of change (pp. 114–125). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyatt, S. L., & Collins, L. M. (2000). Using latent transition analysis to examine the relationship between parental permissiveness and the onset of substance use. In J. Rose, L. Chassin, C. Presson, & S. Sherman (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance use research (pp. 259–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1997). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th edition, pp. 233–265). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17, 144–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, W. (1964a). Notes on factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 29, 177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, W. (1964b). Rotation to achieve factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 29, 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, W. (1965). A method for studying differences between groups. Psychometrika, 30, 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Elrbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. G., & Willett, J. B. (1998). A cross-domain model for growth in adolescent alcohol expectancies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 509–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher, K. J., Gotham, H. J., Erickson, D. J., & Wood, P. K. (1996). A prospective, high-risk study of the relationship between tobacco dependence and alcohol use disorders. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 20, 485–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui, O., Flay, B. R., & Hu, F. B. (1996). Factors affecting attrition in a longitudinal smoking prevention study. Preventive Medicine, 25, 554–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. A., Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1987). Personality and drug use: Reciprocal effects across four years. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 419–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, V. J., & Hollis, J. F. (1989). Preventing smoking relapse, using an individually tailored skills-training technique. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 420–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, W. P. (1993). Dictionary of statistics and methodology: a non-technical guide for the social sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willett, J. B. (1989). Some results on reliability for the longitudinal measurement of change: Implications for the design of studies of individual growth. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 587–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willett, J. B., & Singer, J. D. (1991). How long did it take? Using survival analysis in educational and psychological research. In L. M. Collins & J. L. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions (pp. 310–327). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Windle, M. (1997). Alternative latent variable approaches to modeling change in adolescent alcohol involvement. In K. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 43–78). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. W., & Williams, R. H. (1986). Note on the reliability of experimental measures and the power of significance tests. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 123–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Methodology Center and Department of Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 16802

    Linda M. Collins & Brian P. Flaherty

Authors
  1. Linda M. Collins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian P. Flaherty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology and Institute for Health and Social Policy, The University of Akron, Akron, OH, USA

    Zili Sloboda

  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

    William J. Bukoski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Collins, L.M., Flaherty, B.P. (2006). Methodological Considerations in Prevention Research. In: Sloboda, Z., Bukoski, W.J. (eds) Handbook of Drug Abuse Prevention. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-35408-5_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation