Skip to main content

Semantic Image Representation and Indexing

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Multimedia
  • 55 Accesses

Definition:Besides low-level visual features, such as color, texture, and shapes, high-level semantic information is useful and effective in image retrieval and indexing.

Low-level visual features such as color, texture, and shapes can be easily extracted from images to represent and index image content [1, 2, 3]. However, they are not completely descriptive for meaningful retrieval. High-level semantic information is useful and effective in retrieval. But it depends heavily on semantic regions, which are difficult to obtain themselves. Between low-level features and high-level semantic information, there is an unsolved “semantic gap” [4].

The semantic gap is due to two inherent problems. One problem is that the extraction of complete semantics from image data is extremely hard as it demands general object recognition and scene understanding. Despite encouraging recent progress in object detection and recognition [5, 6], unconstrained broad image domain still remains a challenge for...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. M. Flickner et al., “Query by image and video content: the QBIC system,” IEEE Computer, Vol. 28, No. 9, 1995, pp. 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Pentland, R.W. Picard, and S. Sclaroff, “Photobook: content-based manipulation of image databases,” International Journal of Computer Vision, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1995, pp. 233–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J.R. Bach et al. “Virage image search engine: an open framework for image management,” Proceedings of SPIE 2670, Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases IV, 1996, pp. 76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.W.M. Smeulders et al., “Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 22, No. 12, 2000, pp. 1349–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Fergus, P. Perona, and A. Zisserman, “Object class recognition by scale-invariant learning,” Proceedings of IEEE CVPR 2003, Vol. 2, 2003, pp. 264–271.

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. Ferrari, T. Tuvtelaars, and L.J. van Gool, “Simultaneous object recognition and segmentation by image exploration,” Proceedings of the ECCV 2004, 2004, pp. 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. Cox et al, “The Bayesian image retrieval system, PicHunter: theory, implementation and psychophysical experiments,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2000, pp. 20–37.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y.L. Lu et al., “A unified framework for semantics and feature based relevance feedback in image retrieval systems,” Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 2000, 2000, pp. 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Armitage and P. Enser, “Analysis of user need in image archives,” Journal of Information Science, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1997, pp. 287–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J.H. Lim and J.S. Jin, “A structured learning framework for content-based image indexing and visual query,” Multimedia Systems Journal, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  11. V.N. Vapnik, Statistical Learning Theory, Wiley, New York, 1998.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. C.M. Bishop, Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. B.S. Manjunath and W.Y. Ma, “Texture features for browsing and retrieval of image data,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 18, No. 8, 1996, pp. 837–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Ortega et al., Supporting similarity queries in MARS, Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 1997, 1997, pp. 403–413.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Boughorbel, J.-P. Tarel, and F. Fleuret, “Non-Mercer kernel for SVM object recognition,” Proceedings of British Machine Vision Conference, London, UK, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.J. Swain and D.N. Ballard, “Color indexing,” International Journal of Computer Vision, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1991, pp. 11–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Mohan, C. Papageorgiou, and T. Poggio, “Example-based object detection in images by components,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2001, pp. 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Vailaya et al. “Bayesian framework for hierarchical semantic classification of vacation images,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2001, pp. 117–130.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. J.H. Lim and J.S. Jin, “Semantics discovery for image indexing,” in Tomas Pajdla & Jiri Matas (Eds.), Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision, Prague, Czech Republic, May 11–14, 2004, Springer-Verlag, Germany, LNCS 3021, 2004, pp. 270–281.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.H. Lim and J.S. Jin, “Discovering recurrent image semantics from class discrimination,” EURASIP Journal of Applied Signal Processing, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Lim, JH. (2006). Semantic Image Representation and Indexing. In: Furht, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Multimedia. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30038-4_217

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics