Abstract
The educational process occurs within a very complex system, in turn characterized by the cognitive systems of both teachers and learners, as well as by their interactions and by the technological tools which mediate these latter. In order to gain some knowledge about the interrelationships on which such a system is grounded a possible strategy is to start by investigating, through the methods of experimental psychology, the role played by specific instructional strategies in improving the educational process itself. In particular, we compared two very popular strategies, the one based on usual frontal lesson done by a single teacher, and the other based on a suitable computer-supported hypertextual structure (even in the latter case, however, under teacher supervision and assistance).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Antonietti, A., and Cantoia, M., 2001, Imparare con il Computer, Come Costruire Contesti di Apprendimento per il Software, Erickson, Trento.
Buxton, W., 1996, The emergence of communications study psychological welfare or scientific thoroughfare?; http://www.cjc-online.ca/~cjc/BackIssues/21.4/buxton.htm.
Calvani, A., 1998, Nell’illusione tecnologica c’è un pericolo per chi insegna, Telema 12.
Correard, I., 2001, Twelve years of technology education in France, England and the Netherlands: how do pupils’ perceive the subject?; http://www.iteawww.org.
Gineprini, M, 2000, Multimedialità e centralità della didattica; http://www.pavonerisorse.to.it http://www.ed.gov/technology/TechConf/1999.
Meyer, B. J. F., 1985a, Prose analysis: purposes, procedures, and problems, in: Analyzing and understanding expository text, B. K. Britton and J. Black, eds., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 11–64, 269–304.
Meyer, B. J. F., 1985b, Signaling the structure of text, in: The Technology of Text, D. H. Jonassen, ed., Educational Technology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 64–89.
Olguin, C. J., Delgado A. L. N, and Ricarte, I. L. M., 2000, An agent infrastructure to set collaborative environment, Educational Technology & Society 3(3).
Parisi, D., 2000, Scuola.it, Mondadori, Milano.
Penna, M. P., and Stara, V., 2003, Un esempio di rappresentazione cognitiva dello strumento tecnologico nel sistema scolastico italiano, in: Congresso Nazionale “Contesto, Cultura, Intervento. Quale psicologia per la scuola del futuro”, Lecce 20–22 Giugno 2003, pp. 238–240.
Penna, M. P., Stara, V., and Bonfiglio, N., 2002, A systemic proposal on the use of a new technology as a learning tool in school context, in: Emergence in Complex, Cognitive, Social, and Biological Systems, G. Minati and E. Pessa, eds., Kluwer, New York, pp. 153–157.
Schimmenti, V., D’Alessio, M., and Schieda, A. M., 1996, Il Computer: Rappresentazione e Apprendimento nell’Età Scolare, Franco Angeli, Milano.
Schlager, M., Fusco, J. and Schank, P., 1998, Cornerstones for an on-line community of education professionals, IEEE Technology and Society 17(4).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Penna, M.P., Stara, V., Costenaro, D. (2006). Teachers in the Technological Age: A Comparison between Traditional and Hypertextual Instructional Strategies. In: Minati, G., Pessa, E., Abram, M. (eds) Systemics of Emergence: Research and Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28898-8_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28898-8_31
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-28899-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-28898-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)