Skip to main content

Combining Model and Test Data for Optimal Determination of Percentiles and Allowables: CVaR Regression Approach, Part I

  • Chapter
Robust Optimization-Directed Design

Part of the book series: Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications ((NOIA,volume 81))

Summary

We propose a coherent methodology for integrating various sources of variability on properties of materials in order to accurately predict percentiles of their failure load distribution. The approach involves the linear combination of factors that are associated with failure load, into a statistical factor model. This model directly estimates percentiles of the failure load distribution (rather than mean values as in ordinary least squares regression). A regression framework with CVaR deviation as the measure of optimality, is used in constructing the estimates. We consider estimates of confidence intervals for the estimates of percentiles, and adopt the most promising of these to compute A-Basis and B-Basis values. Numerical experiments with the available dataset show that the approach is quite robust, and can lead to a significant savings in number of actual testings. The approach pools together information from earlier experiments and model runs, with new experiments and model predictions, resulting in accurate inferences even in the presence of relatively small datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. “Accelerated Insertion of Materials-Composites (AIM-C): Methodology”, Boeing Phantom Works Report Number 2004P0020, V 1.2.0, 12 May 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Artzner P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J., and Heath, D. (1997), “Thinking Coherently”, Risk, 10, 68–71.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Artzner P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J., and Heath, D. (1999), “Coherent measures of risk”, Mathematical Finance, 9, 203–228.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Hall, P. and Sheather, S. (1988), “On the distribution of a studentized quantile”, J. Royal Statist Soc. B, 50, 381–391.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Koenker, R. and Bassett, G. (1978), “Regression quantiles”, Econometrica, 46, 33–50.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Koenker, R., and Bassett, G. (1982), “An empirical quantile function for linear models with iid errors”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 407–415.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Koenker, R. (1994), “Confidence intervals for quantile regression”, Proceedings of the 5th Prague Symposium on Asymptotic Statistics, P. Mandl and M. Huskova (eds), Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pflug, G. (2000), “Some remarks on the Value-at-Risk and the Conditional Value-at-Risk”, in Probabilistic Constrained Optimization: Methodology and Applications, S. Uryasev (ed), Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rockafellar, R., and Uryasev, S., (2000), “Optimization of conditional value-at-risk”, Journal of Risk, 2, 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rockafellar R.T. and S. Uryasev. (2002), “Conditional Value-at-Risk for General Loss Distributions”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 26-7, 1443–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev S., and Zabarankin, M. (2002), “Deviation Measures in Risk Analysis and Optimization.”, Research Report 2002-7, ISE Dept., University of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev S., and Zabarankin, M. (2002), “Deviation Measures in Generalized Linear Regression”, Research Report 2002-9, ISE Dept., University of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Trindade, A.A., Uryasev S., and Zrazhevsky, G. (2003), “Controlling Risk via Asymmetric Rezidual Error Tail Constraints with an Application to Financial Returns”, Research Report 2003, ISE Dept., University of Florida, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Uryasev, S., Trindade, A.A. (2006). Combining Model and Test Data for Optimal Determination of Percentiles and Allowables: CVaR Regression Approach, Part I. In: Kurdila, A.J., Pardalos, P.M., Zabarankin, M. (eds) Robust Optimization-Directed Design. Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, vol 81. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28654-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics