Summary
We propose a coherent methodology for integrating various sources of variability on properties of materials in order to accurately predict percentiles of their failure load distribution. The approach involves the linear combination of factors that are associated with failure load, into a statistical factor model. This model directly estimates percentiles of the failure load distribution (rather than mean values as in ordinary least squares regression). A regression framework with CVaR deviation as the measure of optimality, is used in constructing the estimates. We consider estimates of confidence intervals for the estimates of percentiles, and adopt the most promising of these to compute A-Basis and B-Basis values. Numerical experiments with the available dataset show that the approach is quite robust, and can lead to a significant savings in number of actual testings. The approach pools together information from earlier experiments and model runs, with new experiments and model predictions, resulting in accurate inferences even in the presence of relatively small datasets.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
“Accelerated Insertion of Materials-Composites (AIM-C): Methodology”, Boeing Phantom Works Report Number 2004P0020, V 1.2.0, 12 May 2004.
Artzner P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J., and Heath, D. (1997), “Thinking Coherently”, Risk, 10, 68–71.
Artzner P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J., and Heath, D. (1999), “Coherent measures of risk”, Mathematical Finance, 9, 203–228.
Hall, P. and Sheather, S. (1988), “On the distribution of a studentized quantile”, J. Royal Statist Soc. B, 50, 381–391.
Koenker, R. and Bassett, G. (1978), “Regression quantiles”, Econometrica, 46, 33–50.
Koenker, R., and Bassett, G. (1982), “An empirical quantile function for linear models with iid errors”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 407–415.
Koenker, R. (1994), “Confidence intervals for quantile regression”, Proceedings of the 5th Prague Symposium on Asymptotic Statistics, P. Mandl and M. Huskova (eds), Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
Pflug, G. (2000), “Some remarks on the Value-at-Risk and the Conditional Value-at-Risk”, in Probabilistic Constrained Optimization: Methodology and Applications, S. Uryasev (ed), Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Rockafellar, R., and Uryasev, S., (2000), “Optimization of conditional value-at-risk”, Journal of Risk, 2, 21–41.
Rockafellar R.T. and S. Uryasev. (2002), “Conditional Value-at-Risk for General Loss Distributions”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 26-7, 1443–1471.
Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev S., and Zabarankin, M. (2002), “Deviation Measures in Risk Analysis and Optimization.”, Research Report 2002-7, ISE Dept., University of Florida.
Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev S., and Zabarankin, M. (2002), “Deviation Measures in Generalized Linear Regression”, Research Report 2002-9, ISE Dept., University of Florida.
Trindade, A.A., Uryasev S., and Zrazhevsky, G. (2003), “Controlling Risk via Asymmetric Rezidual Error Tail Constraints with an Application to Financial Returns”, Research Report 2003, ISE Dept., University of Florida, to appear.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uryasev, S., Trindade, A.A. (2006). Combining Model and Test Data for Optimal Determination of Percentiles and Allowables: CVaR Regression Approach, Part I. In: Kurdila, A.J., Pardalos, P.M., Zabarankin, M. (eds) Robust Optimization-Directed Design. Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, vol 81. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28654-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28654-3_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-28263-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-28654-9
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)