Skip to main content

Summary

The use of SD is a time-affirmed model of learning. Employed in education, business, and philosophy, it is an ideal fit in therapy. Beck, Ellis, and others use SD as the vehicle for therapy, asking a series of focused questions that include information about the patient’s history, memory, translation of events, interpretation, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.

SD has the effect of moving the therapy along in a clear direction that has been termed guided discovery or collaborative empiricism. SD requires a great deal of work in that the therapist is not simply responding to the patient’s verbalizations but responding while at the same time using the patient’s verbalizations and the direction offered by SD to achieve knowledge, insight, and ultimate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolten, H. (2001). Reason in practice. Journal of Philosophy of Management, 3(1), 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Zurilla, T. (1986). Problem-solving therapy: A social competence approach to clinical intervention. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Zurilla, T. (1988). Problem solving therapies. In K. Dobson (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive behavioral therapies (pp. 85–135). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Secaucus, NJ: Citadel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1989). The ABCs of RET. In A. Freeman, K. M. Simon, L. E. Beutler, & H. Arkowitz (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of cognitive therapy (pp. 5–20). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leahy, R. L. (2001). Overcoming resistance in cognitive therapy. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (1993a). Elements of the Socratic method: I. Systematic questioning. Psychotherapy, 30, 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (1993b). Elements of the Socratic method: II. Inductive reasoning. Psychotherapy, 30, 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (1994). Elements of the Socratic method: III. Universal definitions. Psychotherapy, 31, 286–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (1995). Elements of the Socratic method: IV. Disavowal of knowledge. Psychotherapy, 32, 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (1996). Elements of the Socratic method: V. Self-improvement. Psychotherapy, 33(4), 549–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padesky, C. (1996). Developing cognitive therapist competency: Teaching and supervision models. In P. M. Salkovskis (Ed.), Frontiers of cognitive therapy (pp. 226–292). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, N. (1966). Classroom questions: What kinds? New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Freeman, A. (2005). Socratic Dialogue. In: Freeman, A., Felgoise, S.H., Nezu, C.M., Nezu, A.M., Reinecke, M.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Cognitive Behavior Therapy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48581-8_106

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics