This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alston, W. 1989, Internalism and Externalism in Epistemology, in: Epistemic Justification, Alston, W. (Ed.), Ithaca, 185–226.
Annis, D. 1978, A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification, in: American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (3): 213–219.
Burian, R.M. 1977, More Than a Marriage of Convenience: On the Inextricability of History and Philosophy of Science, in: Philosophy of Science 44: 1–42.
Cheyne, C. 1997, Epistemic Value and Fortuitous Truth, in: Principia 1 (109–134).
De Rose, K. 1999, Contextualism, in: Blackwell’s Guide to Epistemology, Sosa, E. and J. Greco, Malden and Oxford: Blackwell.
Dretske, F.I. 1970, Epistemic Operators, in: The Journal of Philosophy 67(24): 1007–1023.
Dretske, F.I. 1972, Contrastive Statements, in: The Philosophical Review: 411–437.
Dretske, F.I. 1981, The Pragmatic Dimension of Knowledge, in: Philosophical Studies 40: 363–378.
Echeverrìa, J. 1995, The Four Contexts of Scientific Activity, in: Theories and Modelsin Scientific Processes, Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of Science and the Humanities, vol. 44, Herfel, W.E. et al. (Eds.), Amsterdam: Rodopi, 151–167.
Engel Jr, M. 2000, Internalism, the Gettier Problem, and Meta-epistemological Skepticism, in: Grazer Philosophische Studien 60: 99–117.
Feigl, H. 1970, The ‘Orthodox View’ of Theories: Remarks in Defense as Well as Critique, in: Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. IV, Radner, M. and S. Winokur (Eds.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Feyerabend, P. 1978, Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, London: Verso.
Fogelin, R. 1994, Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gettier, E. 1963, Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?, in: Analysis 23: 121–123.
Grundmann, T. 2001, Erkenntnistheorie. Positionen zwischen Tradition und Gegenwart, Paderborn: mentis.
Hacking, I. 1999, Historical Meta-Epistemology, in: Wahrheit und Geschichte, Carl, W. and L. Daston (Eds.), Göttingen: Vandenhoek und Ruprecht, 53–77.
Hanson, N. R. 1965, Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harlan, D. 1989, Intellectual History and the Return of Literature, in: The American Historical Review 94 (3): 581–609.
Hetherington, S. 2001, A Fallibilist and Wholly Internalist Solution to the Gettier Problem, in: Journal of Philosophical Research 26: 307–324.
Kuhn, T. S. 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. 1970, Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, in: Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Lakatos, I. and A. Musgrave (Eds.), London: Cambridge University Press, 91–195.
Lakatos, I. 1974, History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions, in: The Interaction Between Science and Philosophy, Elkana, Y. (ed.), Atlantic Highlands, NY: Humanities Press, 195–241.
Laudan, L. 1984, Science and Values. The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Laudan, L. 1996, Beyond Positivism and Relativism: Theory, Method, and Evidence, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Leplin, J. 1987, The Bearing of Discovery on Justification, in: Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (4): 805–814.
Longino, H. E. 1999, Feminist Epistemology, in: The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, Greco, J. and E. Sosa (Eds.), Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 327–353.
McMullin, E. 1970, The History and Philosophy of Science: A Taxonomy, in: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science, Stuewer, R. H. (ed.), New York et al.: Gordon and Breach, 12–67.
Nickles, T. 1980, Introductory Essay: Scientific Discovery and the Future of Philosophy of Science, in: Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality, Nickles, T. (Ed.), Dordrecht: Reidel, 1–59.
Peursen, C.A.v. 1989, Discovery as the Context of any Scientific Justification, in: Man and World 22: 471–484.
Polanyi, M. 1966, The Tacit Dimension, New York: Doubleday and Company.
Sanford, D.H. 1981, Knowledge and Relevant Alternatives: Comments on Dretske, in: Philosophical Studies 40: 378–388.
Shapere, D. 1977, What Can the Theory of Knowledge Learn From the History of Knowledge?, in: The Monist 60: 488–508.
Shapere, D. 1980, The Character of Scientific Change, in: Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality, vol. I, Nickles, T. (ed.), Dordrecht: Reidel, 61–116.
Siegel, H. 1980, Justification, Discovery and the Naturalizing of Epistemology, in: Philosophy of Science 47: 297–321.
Sosa, E. 1988, Knowledge in Context, Skepticism in Doubt. The Virtue of our Faculties, in: Philosophical Perspectives 2 (Epistemology): 139–155.
Spohn, W. 2001, Vier Begründungsbegriffe,in: Erkenntnistheorie. Positionen zwischen Tradition und Gegenwart, Grundmann, T. (ed.), Paderborn: mentis, 33–52.
Stalnaker, R.C. 1999, Context and Content, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Suppe, F. (ed.) 1977, The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2., Urbana, Chicago und London.
Taschek, W.W. 1998, On Ascribing Beliefs: Content in Context, in: The Journal of Philosophy 95 (7): 323–353.
Willaschek, M. 2000, Wissen, Zweifel, Kontext. Eine kontextualistische Zurückweisung des Skeptizismus, in: Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 54 (2): 151–172.
Williams, M. 1988, Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism, in: Mind 97 (387): 415–439.
Williams, M. 1991, Unnatural Doubts. Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism, Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.
Williams, M. 1999, Skepticism, in: The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, Greco, J. and E. Sosa (Eds.), Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 35–69.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schickore, J. (2003). The Contexts of Scientific Justification. Some Reflections on the Relation Between Epistemological Contextualism and Philosophy of Science. In: Stadler, F. (eds) The Vienna Circle and Logical Empiricism. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48214-2_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48214-2_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1269-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48214-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive