Skip to main content
Book cover

ECSCW 2001 pp 259–278Cite as

Cognitive Properties of a Whiteboard: A Case Study in a Trauma Centre

  • Chapter

Abstract

Distributed cognition as an approach to collaborative work holds that a work unit is cognitive system in which cognitive activities are carried out jointly by workers with the use of tools. This approach has several direct implications to the study of collaborative work. In this paper, we analysed staff interactions with a large display board in a Level I trauma centre operating room unit. Coordination needs are exacerbated by the unpredictability of incoming emergency surgery patients admitted to the trauma centre as well as other contingencies (such as changes in scheduled surgery cases or staffing). The public display board has evolved into a key component for supporting collaborative work. The physical and perceptual properties of the board are exploited by the clinicians to support rapid paced, highly dynamic work. The canvas-like appearances of the display board, combined with magnetic objects attached to the board, afford its users to taylor the board as an effective coordinative tool and to invent new ways of representing information. Based on the concept of display-based cognition, our analysis illustrates the role of public displays in facilitating negotiation of scheduling, joint planning, and augmenting inter-personal communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bannon, L. and K. Schmidt, Eds. (1991). CSCW: Four characters in search of a context. Studies in Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Amsterdam, North Holland/Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardram, J. E. (1997). “I love the system — I just don’t use it!”. Proc. ACM GROUP97International Conference on Supporting Group Work, 251–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardram, J.E. (1998): “Designing for the Dynamics of Cooperative Work Activities”, Poltrock & Grudin (eds): Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW’98, ACM, pp. 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardram, J. E. (2000). “Temporal coordination: On time and coordination of collaborative activities at a surgical department.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 9: 157–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellotti, V. and Y. Rogers (1997). “From Web press to Web pressure: multimedia representations and multimedia publishing.” Proc. ACM CHI’96 Human Factors in Computing Systems 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, M. (1999). “Accumulating and coordinating: Occasions for information technologies in medical work.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8: 373–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowicz, D. A., G. O. Barnett and Chueh, H.C., (1999). eWhiteBoard: A real time clinical scheduler. Proceedings of American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) 1999 Annual Symposium, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndtsson, J. and M. Normakk (1999). The coordinative functions of flight strips: air traffic control work revisited. ACM GROUP99, 101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Boguslaw, R. and E. H. Porter (1962). Team functions and training. In, R. M. Gagne (Ed) Psychological Principles in System Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston: 387–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbis, C. (1999), Communication and Coordination Through Public and Private Representations in Control Rooms, in Extended Abstracts of the Conference for Human Factors in Computing Systems — CHI’2000, 1–6 April, The Hague, The Netherlands, 67–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbis, C. and Y. Waern (1999). “Team coordination and communication in a rescue command staff: The role of public representations.” La Travail Humain: 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995a). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995b). “How a cockpit remembers its speeds.” Cognitive Science 19: 265–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, J. H. (1989). Display-based problem solving. In K. Kotovsky (Ed.) Complex Information Processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon. Hillsday, NJ: Erlbaum: 319–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, W. E. (1999). “Is paper safer? The role of paper flight strips in air traffic control.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 6(4): 311–340.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W. and K. Crownston (1994). “The interdisciplinary study of coordination.” ACM Computing Surveys 26(1): 87–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mynatt, E. D., T. Igarashi, et al. (2000). “Designing an Augmented Writing Surface.” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 20(4): 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, S. J. (1991). “Display-based action at the user interface.” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 35: 275–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Y. (1992). “Coordinating computer-mediated work.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work(CSCW) 1: 295–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. D. and C. Simone (1996). “Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 5: 155–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, L. D. (1994). “Actions Speak Louder Than Words: How Pilots Use Nonverbal Information for Crew Communications.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting: 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefik, M., D. G. Bobrow, et al. (1987). “WYSIWIS revised: Early experience with multiuser interfaces.” ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 5(2): 147–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. A. (1988). “Representing practice in cognitive science.” Human Studies 11: 305–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teege, G. (2000). “Users as composers: Parts and features as a basis for tailorability in CSCW systems.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 9: 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, S. and H. Schwarz (1999). “Meetings of the Board: The impact of scheduling medium on long term group coordination in software development.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8: 175–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. and D. A. Norman (1994). “Representations in distributed cognitive tasks.” Cognitive Science 18(1): 87–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Xiao, Y., Lasome, C., Moss, J., Mackenzie, C.F., Faraj, S. (2001). Cognitive Properties of a Whiteboard: A Case Study in a Trauma Centre. In: Prinz, W., Jarke, M., Rogers, Y., Schmidt, K., Wulf, V. (eds) ECSCW 2001. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48019-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48019-0_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7162-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48019-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics