Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology ((IDCA))

  • 1104 Accesses

Conclusions

On stratified sites, our data on the ordering of events consist of observable evidence of stratigraphic superposition of deposits and features and cutting of interfaces into pre-existing deposits. Sometimes this evidence maybe difficult to recognize in the field, and archaeologists spend years gaining experience in the detection of interfaces and features. Once they have entered such information into their field notes, however, we can use careful analysis of the individual observations, usually with the aid of Harris matrices and computer software, to detect probable errors in the stratigraphic observations and to order deposits, interfaces, and features in time. Sites with complex stratigraphy, standing architecture, or many noncontiguous excavation areas are likely to produce multilinear sequences with many units of uncertain stratigraphic order. We must then turn to other methods, some of which are discussed in the following two chapters, to sort these out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Cited

  • Bibby, D. I., 1993, Building stratigraphic sequences on excavations: An example from Konstanz, Germany. In Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy, edited by E. C. Harris, M. R. Brown, and G. J. Brown, pp. 104–121. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackham, M., 1994, Chronological Correlations of Archaeological Stratigraphy: An Intrasite Test at Tabaqat al-Buma, Jordan. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • -1998, The Unitary Association Method of relative dating and its application to archaeological data. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 5:165–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courty, M. A., Goldberg, P., and Macphail, R., 1989, Soils and Micromorphology in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C., 1882, The Formation of Vegetable Mould, through the Action of Worms with Observations on their Habits. John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dever, W., and Lance, H. D., 1978, A Manual of Field Excavation Hebrew Union College, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrand, W., 1984, Stratigraphic classification: Living within the law. Quarterly Review of Archaeology 5:1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guex, J., 1991, Biochronological Correlations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, N., 1993, Matrices and Maya archaeology. In Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy, edited by E. C. Harris, M. R. Brown, and G. J. Brown, pp. 139–154. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E. C., 1975, The stratigraphic sequence: A question of time. World Archaeology 7:109–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -1989, Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy, 2nd edition. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E. C., M. R. Brown, and G. J. Brown, eds., 1993, Practices of Archaeological Stratigraphy. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton, C., 1980, Mathematics in Archaeology. Collins, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paice, P., 1991, Extensions to the Harris matrix system to illustrate stratigraphic discussion of an archaeological site. Journal of Field Archaeology 18:17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savary, J., and Guex, J., 1991, BioGraph: Un nouveau programme de construction des corrélations biochronologiques basées sur les Associations Unitaires. Bulletin Laboratoire Géologie, Université de Laussanne 313:317–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollar, I., Herzon, I., Rehmet, J., and Greenacre, M. J., 1992, The Bonn Archaeological Statistics Package, Version 4.5. Unkelbach Valley Software Works, Remagen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B., 1987, Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J., 1987, Deposits for archaeologists. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 11:337–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • -1992, Interpreting stratification of a shell midden. In Deciphering a Shell Midden, edited by J. Stein, pp. 71–93. Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triggs, J., 1993, The seriation of multilinear stratigraphic sequences. In Practices of Archaeological Stratigraphy, edited by E. C. Harris, M. R. Brown and G. J. Brown, pp. 250–73. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • -1997, Matrix Seriation: A Relative Dating Technique for Sites with Multilinear Stratigraphic Sequences. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W. R., and Johnson, D. L., 1978, A survey of disturbance processes in archaeological site formation. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 1:315–81.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2002). Stratigraphy. In: Jochim, M.A., Dickens, R.S. (eds) The Archaeologist’s Laboratory. Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47654-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47654-1_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46369-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47654-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics