Skip to main content
Log in

Easily applied tests of fit for the Rayleigh distribution

  • Published:
Sankhya B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this note two easily applied moment tests of the Rayleigh hypothesis are compared with the Anderson-Darling test, some smooth tests and tests based on the empirical Laplace transform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Gürtler, N., and N. Henze. 2000. Recent and classical goodness-of-fit tests for the Poisson distribution. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 90: 207–225.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henze, N., and B. Klar. 1996. Properly rescaled components of smooth tests of fit are diagnostic. Australian Journal of Statistics 38: 61–74.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • IMSL. 1995. Users’ manual. Houston: IMSL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meintanis, S., and G. Iliopoulos. 2003. Tests of fit for the Rayleigh distribution based on the Empirical Laplace transform. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 55(1): 137–151.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman, J. 1937. ‘Smooth’ test for goodness of fit. Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift 20: 150–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, J.C.W., and D.J. Best. 1989. Smooth tests of goodness of fit. New York: Oxford University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, J.C.W., D.J. Best, and K.L. Mathews. 1995. Interpreting the skewness coefficient. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 24(3): 593–600.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, J.C.W., O. Thas, and B. De Boeck. 2008. A generalised Emerson recurrence relation. Australian and NZ Journal of Statistics 50(3): 235–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, J.C.W., O. Thas, and D.J. Best. 2009. Smooth tests of goodness of fit: using R, 2nd ed. Singapore: Wiley.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli, J.J., and M.A. Stephens. 1997. Cramer-von Mises tests of fit for the Poisson distribution. Canadian Journal of Statistics 25: 257–268.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Thas, O., J.C.W. Rayner, D.J. Best, and B. De Boeck. 2009. Informative statistical analyses using smooth goodness of fit tests. Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice 3(3): 705–733.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. J. Best.

Appendix

Appendix

Asymptotically U √(n/0.37183) has a normal distribution with mean √(n/0.37183)E[U] and variance V. For the null case E[U] = 0 and V = 1. Asymptotically, for any alternative and using the delta method,

$$ \matrix{ {E\left[ U \right] = {\mu_2} - \left( {4/\pi - 1} \right){\mu^2}{\hbox{ and}}} \cr {V = f_x^2{\mu_2} + {\mu_4} - \mu_2^2 + 2{f_x}{\mu_3}.} \cr }<!end array> $$

Here \( {f_x} = - \left( {{{8} \left/ {\pi } \right.} - 2} \right)\mu \), μ is the mean and μ r , r = 2, 3, ... are the central moments of the alternative distribution. The asymptotic power of U for test size α = 0.05 and an alternative with E[U] = 0 is

$$ P\left( {Z > 1.645/\surd \left( {V/0.37183} \right)\left| {Z\;{\hbox{is}}\;{\hbox{N}}\left( {0,1} \right)} \right.} \right). $$

Suppose the alternative is a rectangular distribution with support (a, b), R(a, b) say, in which \( a = \surd \left( {\pi /2} \right) - \surd \left\{ {3\left( {2 - \pi /2} \right)} \right\} \) and \( b = 2\surd \left( {\pi /2} \right) - a \). Then E[R] = √(π/2) and var(R) = 2−π/2, equal to the corresponding moments of the Rayleigh distribution with θ = 1, so that asymptotically E[U] = 0 and V = 0.3487. Thus the asymptotic power of U is

$$ P\left( {Z > 1.699\left| {Z\;{\hbox{is}}\;{\hbox{N}}\left( {0,1} \right)} \right.} \right) = 0.045. $$

Thus asymptotically the test based on U is biased, albeit that the bias is only slight.

The following table shows how the power of the test based on U approaches its asymptotic limit as n→∞. The finite sample powers for the test based on U in Table 5 are calculated by parametric bootstrap with 1,000 simulations in both the inner and outer loops.

Table 5 Power of the test based on U for various n and α = 0.05

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Best, D.J., Rayner, J.C.W. & Thas, O. Easily applied tests of fit for the Rayleigh distribution. Sankhya B 72, 254–263 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13571-011-0011-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13571-011-0011-2

Keywords

Navigation