Skip to main content
Log in

Consensus for double-integrator dynamics with velocity constraints

  • Regular Papers
  • Control Theory
  • Published:
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of consensus for double-integrator dynamics with velocity constraints and a constant group reference velocity is addressed such that: (i) the control law of an agent does not depend on the local neighbors’ velocities or accelerations, but only on the neighbors’ positions and on the own agent velocity; (ii) the constraints are non-symmetric; (iii) the class of nonlinear functions used to account for the velocity constraints is more general than the ones that are normally considered in the literature. We propose a decentralized control strategy with the neighboring topology described by an undirected interaction graph that is connected. Mathematical guarantees of convergence without violating the constraints are given. A numerical experiment is provided to illustrate the effectiveness of our approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. A. Hsieh, V. Kumar, and L. Chaimowicz, “Decentralized controllers for shape generation with robotic systems,” Robotica, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 691–701, September 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. W. Casbeer, D. B. Kingston, R. W. Beard, T. W. McLain, S.-M. Li, and R. Mehra, “Cooperative forest fire surveillance using a team of small unmanned air vehicles,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 351–360, May 2006.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. X. C. Ding, A. R. Rahmani, and M. Egerstedt, “Multi-UAV convoy protection: an optimal approach to path planning and coordination,” IEEE Trans. on Robotics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 256–268, April 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Franchi, P. Stegagno, M. D. Rocco, and G. Oriolo, “Distributed target localization and encircling with a multi-robot system,” Proc. of the 7th IFAC Symposium on Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles, pp. 1–6, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Olfati-Saber and R. M. Murray, “Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 1520–1533, September 2004.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Arcak, “Passivity as a design tool for group coordination,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 1380–1390, August 2007.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. W. Ren, R. W. Beard, and E. M. Atkins, “A survey of consensus problems in multi-agent coordination,” Proc. of the American Control Conference, pp. 1859–1864, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Ren and R. W. Beard, “Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 655–661, May 2005.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Olfati-Saber, “Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: algorithms and theory,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 401–420, March 2006.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Xie and L. Wang, “Consensus control for a class of networks of dynamic agents,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 17, pp. 941–949, November 2007.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. W. Ren and E. Atkins, “Distributed multi-vehicle coordinated control via local information exchange,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 17, pp. 1002–1033, November 2007.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. F. Xiao, L. Wang, J. Chen, and Y. Gao, “Finitetime formation control for multi-agent systems,” Automatica, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 2605–2611, November 2009.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Li, J. Xiang, and W. Wei, “Consensus problems for linear time-invariant multi-agent systems with saturation constraints,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 823–829, April 2011.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Gao, J. Zhang, and W. Chen, “Second-order consensus for multiagent systems under directed and switching topologies,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, pp. 1–21, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Z. Wang and J. Cao, “Quasi-consensus of secondorder leader-following multi-agent systems,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 545–551, March 2012.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Zhao, S. Xu, and D. Yuan, “An LMI approach to consensus in second-order multi-agent systems,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1111–1115, December 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. L. Gao, X. Zhu, and W. Chen, “Leader-following consensus problem with an accelerated motion leader,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 931–939, October 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. X. Luo, D. Liu, X. Guan, and S. Li, “Flocking in target pursuit for multi-agent systems with partial informed agents,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 560–569, March 2012.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Wen, Z. Duan, W. Yu, and G. Chen, “Consensus in multi-agent systems with communication constraints,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 22, pp. 170–182, January 2012.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. G. Wen, Z. Duan, Z. Lu, and G. Chen, “Consensus and its L2 gain performance of multi-agent systems with intermittent information transmissions,” International Journal Control, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 384–396, January 2012.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Lin and Y. Jia, “Consensus of second-order discrete-time multi-agent systems with nonuniform time-delays and dynamically changing topologies,” Automatica, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 2154–2158, September 2009.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Q. Zhang, Y. Niu, L. Wang, L. Shen, and H. Zhu, “Average consensus seeking of high-order continuous-time multi-agent systems with multiple timevarying communication delays,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1209–1218, December 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. W. Yu, G. Chen, M. Cao, and J. Kurths, “Secondorder consensus for multiagent systems with directed topologies and nonlinear dynamics,” IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics — Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 881–891, June 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. W. Yu, G. Chen, and M. Cao, “Some necessary and sufficient conditions for second-order consensus in multi-agent dynamical systems,” Automatica, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1089–1095, June 2010.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Li, H. Du, and X. Lin, “Finite-time consensus algorithm for multi-agent systems with doubleintegrator dynamics,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1706–1712, August 2011.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. H. Du, S. Li, and C. Qian, “Finite-time attitude tracking control of spacecraft with application to attitude synchronization,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 2711–2717, November 2011.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. H. Li, X. Liao, and G. Chen, “Leader-following finite-time consensus in second-order multi-agent networks with nonlinear dynamics,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 422–426, April 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. D. Zhao, T. Zou, S. Li, and Q. Zhu, “Adaptive backstepping sliding mode control for leaderfollower multi-agent systems,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 1109–1117, May 2012.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. H. Du, S. Li, and P. Shi, “Robust consensus algorithm for second-order multi-agent systems with external disturbances,” International Journal of Control, vol. 85, no. 12, pp. 1913–1928, December 2012.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. H. Hu, G. Chen, and G. Xie, “Second-order consensus of multi-agent systems with unknown but bounded disturbance,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 258–267, April 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. G. Ferrari-Trecate, L. Galbusera, M. P. E. Marciandi, and R. Scattolini, “Contractive distributed MPC for consensus in networks of single- and doubleintegrators,” Proc. of the 17th World Congress of the International Federation of Automatic Control, pp. 9033–9038, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  32. A. Nedic, A. Ozdaglar, and P. A. Parrilo, “Constrained consensus and optimization in multi-agent networks,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 922–938, April 2010.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. J. Lee, J.-S. Kim, H. Song, and H. Shim, “A constrained consensus problem using MPC,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 952–957, October 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. U. Lee and M. Mesbahi, “Constrained consensus via logarithmic barrier functions,” Proc. of the 5th Conf. on Decision and Control, pp. 3608–3613, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  35. W. Ren, “On consensus algorithms for doubleintegrator dynamics,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1503–1509, July 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. K. Peng, H.-S. Su, and Y.-P. Yang, “Coordinated control of multi-agent systems with a varyingvelocity leader and input saturation,” Communications in Theoretical Physics, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 449–456, September 2009.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. A. Abdessameud and A. Tayebi, “On consensus algorithms for double-integrator dynamics without velocity measurements and with input constraints,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 812–821, December 2010.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. W. Ren, “Distributed leaderless consensus algorithms for networked Euler-Lagrange systems,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 82, no. 11, pp. 2137–2149, November 2009.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. J. R. T. Lawton, R. W. Beard, and B. J. Young, “A decentralized approach to formation maneuvers,” IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 933–941, December 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. A. Abdessameud and A. Tayebi, “Synchronization of networked Lagrangian systems with input constraints,” Proc. of the 18h IFAC World Congress, pp. 2382–2387, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  41. D. V. Dimarogonas and K. J. Kyriakopoulos, “On the rendezvous problem for multiple nonholonomic agents,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 916–922, May 2007.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. W. Ren, “Collective motion from consensus with Cartesian coordinate coupling,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1330–1335, June 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. P. Lin, K. Qin, Z. Lin, and W. Ren, “Collective rotating motions of second-order multi-agent systems in three-dimensional space,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 365–372, June 2011.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. P. Lin and Y. Jia, “Distributed rotating formation control of multi-agent systems,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 587–595, October 2010.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. X.-P Chen, H.-B. Xu, and Y.-X. Ban, “Rotating consensus of multi-agent systems without relative velocity measurement,” Chinese Physics B, vol. 20, no. 9, 090515, September 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. S. Bayraktar, J. E. Fainekos, and G. J. Pappas, “Experimental cooperative control of fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles,” Proc. of the 43rd Conf. Decision and Control, pp. 4292–4298, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  47. F. Bullo, J. Cortés, and S. Martínez, Distributed Control of Robotic Networks, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 2009.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. D. S. Bernstein, Matrix Mathematics: Theory, Facts and Formulas, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  49. J.-J. E. Slotine and W. Li, Applied Nonlinear Control, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tales A. Jesus.

Additional information

Tales A. Jesus received his B.S. degree in Control and Automation Engineering, and his M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil, in 2006, 2008, and 2013, respectively. He is currently an Assistant Professor with the Computation Department at Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais (CEFET-MG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil. His research interests include mobile robotics, multiagent coordination, and nonlinear control theory.

Luciano C. A. Pimenta received his B.S., M.Sc., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil, in 2003, 2005, and 2009, respectively. From April 2007 to June 2008, he was a visiting Ph.D. student at the General Robotics, Automation, Sensing and Perception (GRASP) Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. He is currently an Assistant Professor with the Department of Electronic Engineering at UFMG. His research interests include robotics, multi-robot systems, and control theory.

Leonardo A. B. Tôrres received his B.Eng. in 1997, and his PhD degree in 2001, both in Electrical Engineering, from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Brazil, and in 2010- 2011 he was a visiting scholar at University of California Santa Barbara. In 2002, he joined the Department of Electronic Engineering, at UFMG. As Associate Professor, he has been working with control and synchronization of nonlinear dynamical systems, with applications to information transmission, uninterruptible power supplies, and robotic coordination.

Eduardo M. A. M. Mendes received his Ph.D. degree in Automatic Control and Systems Engineering from the University of Sheffield, Sheffield, U.K. in 1995. He was appointed to his current position of Associate Professor, Department of Electronic Engineering, UFMG, Brazil in 2002. His research interests include system identification for nonlinear systems, NARMAX methods, model validation, prediction, spectral analysis, chaos, control of nonlinear systems, signal processing and analysis of biomedical signals and images. He has authored over 100 research and scientific publications in various fields.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jesus, T.A., Pimenta, L.C.A., Tôrres, L.A.B. et al. Consensus for double-integrator dynamics with velocity constraints. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 12, 930–938 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-013-0309-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-013-0309-0

Keywords

Navigation