Skip to main content
Log in

Preoperative prediction of difficult lap chole: a scoring method

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the procedure of choice for management of symptomatic gallstone disease. At times it is easy and can be done quickly. Occasionally it is difficult and takes longer time. But there is no scoring system available to predict the degree of difficulty of LC preoperatively.

Aim

To develop a scoring method to predict difficult LC preoperatively.

Materials and methods

There were 228 cases in 2 years, operated by a single experienced surgeon. There are total 15 score from history, clinical, sonological findings. Score up to 5 predicted easy, 6–10 difficult and >10 are very difficult.

Results

Prediction came true in 88.8% for easy and 92% difficult cases there were no cases with score above 10. The factors like BMI > 27.5 (p < 0.010), previous hospitalization (p < 0.001), palpable GB (p < 0.01) US-Thick-walled GB (p < 0.038) are found of statistical significance in predicting difficult LC.

Conclusion

The proposed scoring system is reliable with a sensitivity and specificity of 75.00% and 90.24%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lam CM, Murray FE, Cuschieri A (1996) Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Scotland. Gut 38:282–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. The southern Surgeons Club, Meyers WC (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomy. N Engl J Med 324:1073–1078

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kama NA, Kolongue M, Doganay M, Reis E, Atle M, Dolapiu M (2001) Risk score conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 181:520–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kanaan SA, Murayama KM, Merriam LT, Dawes LG, Puystowsky JB, Reye RB, Jochl RJ (2002) Risk factor for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. J Surg Res 106:20–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heng-Hui Lein MD, Ching-Shui Huang (2002) Male gender: Risk factor for severe symptomatic cholelithiasis. World J Surg 26:598–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Russell JC, Walsh SJ, Fourquet LR, Mattie A, Lynch J (1998) Symptomatic cholelithiasis: a different disease in men? Ann Surg 277:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fried GM, Barkun JS, Sigman HH, Joseph L, Uas D, Garzon J, Hinchey EJ, Meakins JL (1994) Factors determining conversion to laparotomy in patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 167:35–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosen M, Brody F, Ponsky J (2002) Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 184:254–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmet Alponat, Cheng K, Bee C Koh, Andrea R, Peter MY Goh (1997) Predictive Factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 21:629–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Reiger R, et al. (1998) Preoperative ultrasonography and prediction of difficulties in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 22:75–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Walnerhanssen BK, Ackermann C, Guenin MO, Kern B, Tondelli P, von Felie M, Peterli R (2005) Twelve years of LC. Chirurg 76(3):263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aswini K. Pujahari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Randhawa, J.S., Pujahari, A.K. Preoperative prediction of difficult lap chole: a scoring method. Indian J Surg 71, 198–201 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-009-0055-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-009-0055-y

Keywords

Navigation