Abstract
For water levels, generally a non-stationary variable, the technique of universal kriging is applied in preference to ordinary kriging as the interpolation method. Each set of data in every sector can fit different empirical semivariogram models since they have different spatial structures. These models can be classified as circular, spherical, tetraspherical, pentaspherical, exponential, gaussian, rational quadratic, hole effect, K-bessel, J-bessel and stable. This study aims to determine which of these empirical semivariogram models will be best matched with the experimental models obtained from groundwater-table values collected from Mustafakemalpasa left bank irrigation scheme in 2002. The model having the least error was selected by comparing the observed water-table values with the values predicted by empirical semivariogram models. It was determined that the rational quadratic empirical semivariogram model is the best fitted model for the studied irrigation area.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anonymous 1967 Mustafakemalpasa Sulama Projesi Tesis Tanitma Foyu, Devlet Su Isleri, Karacabey Sube Mudurlugu, Bursa (Turkish).
Anonymous 1976 Mustafakemalpasa Projesi, MKP Ovasi Detayli Arazi Tasnif ve Drenaj Raporu, Cilt 1, Devlet Su Isleri Genel Mudurlugu 1. Bolge Mudurlugu, Bursa (Turkish).
Anonymous 2000 Mustafakemalpasa Sulamasi Taban suyu Raporu (Ekim 1999–Eylül 2000). Devlet Su Isleri Genel Mudurlugu 1. Bolge Mudurlugu, Bursa (Turkish).
Anonymous 2001 Surface III, Kansas Geology Survey at the University of Kansas, http://www.kgs.ku.edu/Tis/surf3.
Bastin G, Lorent B, Duque C and Gevers M 1984 Optimal estimation of the average rainfall and optimal selection of raingage locations; Water Resour. Res. 20(4) 463–470.
Chirlin G R and Dagan G 1980 Theoretical Head Variogram for Steady Flow in Statistically Homogeneous Aquifers; Water Resour. Res. 16(6) 1001–1015.
Coram J, Dyson P and Evans R 2001 An Evaluation Framework for Dryland Salinity, report prepared for the National Land & Water Resources Audit (NLWRA), sponsored by the Bureau of Rural Sciences, National Heritage Trust, NLWRA and National Dryland Salinity Program, Australia.
Duc H, Shannon I and Azzi M 2000 Spatial distribution characteristics of some air pollutants in Sydney; Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 54(1–3) 1–21.
Hill M and Alexandar F 1989 Statistical Methods Used in Assessing the Risk of Disease Near a Source of Possible Environmental Pollution: a Review. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 152 353–363.
Johnson K, Ver Hoef J M, Krivoruchko K and Lucas N 2001 Using ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst, GIS by ESRI, Redlands, USA.
Kumar D and Ahmed S 2003 “Seasonal Behaviour of Spatial Variability of Groundwater Level in a Granitic Aquifer in Monsoon Climate”; Curr. Sci. 84(2) 188–196
Vieira S R, Hatfield J L, Nielsen D R and Biggar J W 1983 “Geostatistical Theory and Application to Variability of Some Agronomical Properties”, Hilgardia 51(2) 1–75, Davis, California.
White J G, Welch R M and Norvell W A 1997 Soil Zinc Map of the USA Using Geostatistics and Geographic Information Systems; Soil Science Society of America Journal 61(1) 185–194.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gundogdu, K.S., Guney, I. Spatial analyses of groundwater levels using universal kriging. J Earth Syst Sci 116, 49–55 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-007-0006-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-007-0006-6