Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Response Rates to Anticonvulsant Trials in Patients with Triphasic-Wave EEG Patterns of Uncertain Significance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Generalized triphasic waves (TPWs) occur in both metabolic encephalopathies and non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). Empiric trials of benzodiazepines (BZDs) or non-sedating AED (NSAEDs) are commonly used to differentiate the two, but the utility of such trials is debated. The goal of this study was to assess response rates of such trials and investigate whether metabolic profile differences affect the likelihood of a response.

Methods

Three institutions within the Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium retrospectively identified patients with unexplained encephalopathy and TPWs who had undergone a trial of BZD and/or NSAEDs to differentiate between ictal and non-ictal patterns. We assessed responder rates and compared metabolic profiles of responders and non-responders. Response was defined as resolution of the EEG pattern and either unequivocal improvement in encephalopathy or appearance of previously absent normal EEG patterns, and further categorized as immediate (within <2 h of trial initiation) or delayed (>2 h from trial initiation).

Results

We identified 64 patients with TPWs who had an empiric trial of BZD and/or NSAED. Most patients (71.9 %) were admitted with metabolic derangements and/or infection. Positive clinical responses occurred in 10/53 (18.9 %) treated with BZDs. Responses to NSAEDs occurred in 19/45 (42.2 %), being immediate in 6.7 %, delayed but definite in 20.0 %, and delayed but equivocal in 15.6 %. Overall, 22/64 (34.4 %) showed a definite response to either BZDs or NSAEDs, and 7/64 (10.9 %) showed a possible response. Metabolic differences of responders versus non-responders were statistically insignificant, except that the 48-h low value of albumin in the BZD responder group was lower than in the non-responder group.

Conclusions

Similar metabolic profiles in patients with encephalopathy and TPWs between responders and non-responders to anticonvulsants suggest that predicting responders a priori is difficult. The high responder rate suggests that empiric trials of anticonvulsants indeed provide useful clinical information. The more than twofold higher response rate to NSAEDs suggests that this strategy may be preferable to BZDs. Further prospective investigation is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bahamon-Dussan JE, Celesia GG, Grigg-Damberger MM. Prognostic significance of EEG triphasic waves in patients with altered state of consciousness. J Clin Neurophysiol Off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc. 1989;6:313–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eidelman LA, Putterman D, Putterman C, Sprung CL. The spectrum of septic encephalopathy. Definitions, etiologies, and mortalities. JAMA. 1996;275:470–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B, Speroff T, Gordon SM, Harrell FE, et al. Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. JAMA. 2004;291:1753–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bickford RG, Butt HR. Hepatic coma: the electroencephalographic pattern. J Clin Invest. 1955;34:790–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ogunyemi A. Triphasic waves during post-ictal stupor. Can J Neurol Sci. 1996;23:208–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Primavera A, Traverso F. Triphasic waves in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neurol Belg. 1990;90:274–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Niimi Y, Hiratsuka H, Tomita H, Inaba Y, Moriiwa M, Kato M, et al. A case of metrizamide encephalopathy with triphasic waves on EEG. Nō Shinkei Brain Nerve. 1984;36:1167–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Martínez-Rodríguez JE, Barriga FJ, Santamaria J, Iranzo A, Pareja JA, Revilla M, et al. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus associated with cephalosporins in patients with renal failure. Am J Med. 2001;111:115–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaplan PW, Birbeck G. Lithium-induced confusional states: nonconvulsive status epilepticus or triphasic encephalopathy? Epilepsia. 2006;47:2071–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hormes JT, Benarroch EE, Rodriguez M, Klass DW. Periodic sharp waves in baclofen-induced encephalopathy. Arch Neurol. 1988;45:814–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wieser HG, Schindler K, Zumsteg D. EEG in Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:935–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aguglia U, Gambardella A, Oliveri RL, Lavano A, Camerlingo R, Quattrone A. Triphasic waves and cerebral tumors. Eur Neurol. 1990;30:1–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirsch LJ, LaRoche SM, Gaspard N, Gerard E, Svoronos A, Herman ST, et al. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society’s Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology: 2012 version. J Clin Neurophysiol Off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc. 2013;30:1–27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaya D, Bingol CA. Significance of atypical triphasic waves for diagnosing nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Epilepsy Behav EB. 2007;11:567–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boulanger J-M, Deacon C, Lécuyer D, Gosselin S, Reiher J. Triphasic waves versus nonconvulsive status epilepticus: EEG distinction. Can J Neurol Sci J Can Sci Neurol. 2006;33:175–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fountain NB, Waldman WA. Effects of benzodiazepines on triphasic waves: implications for nonconvulsive status epilepticus. J Clin Neurophysiol Off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc. 2001;18:345–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jirsch J, Hirsch LJ. Nonconvulsive seizures: developing a rational approach to the diagnosis and management in the critically ill population. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118:1660–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chong DJ, Hirsch LJ. Which EEG patterns warrant treatment in the critically ill? Reviewing the evidence for treatment of periodic epileptiform discharges and related patterns. J. Clin Neurophysiol Off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc. 2005;22:79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sutter R, Kaplan PW. Electroencephalographic criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus: synopsis and comprehensive survey: EEG criteria for NCSE. Epilepsia. 2012;53:1–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Claassen J, How I. Treat patients with EEG patterns on the ictal-interictal continuum in the neuro ICU. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11:437–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Litt B, Wityk RJ, Hertz SH, Mullen PD, Weiss H, Ryan DD, et al. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in the critically ill elderly. Epilepsia. 1998;39:1194–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sutter R, Stevens RD, Kaplan PW. Significance of triphasic waves in patients with acute encephalopathy: a nine-year cohort study. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124(10):1952–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Holtkamp M, Meierkord H. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in the intensive care setting. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2011;4:169–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Fagan KJ, Lee SI. Prolonged confusion following convulsions due to generalized nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Neurology. 1990;40:1689–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaplan PW. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in the emergency room. Epilepsia. 1996;37:643–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Drislane FW. Presentation, evaluation, and treatment of nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Epilepsy Behav EB. 2000;1:301–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

DOR, PMC, AM, LM, and BF report no relevant disclosures. NG received research support from the Belgian Fund for Scientific Research. MBW received research support from the National Institute of Health (NIH-NINDS, 1K23NS090900-01), the Phyllis & Jerome Lyle Rappaport Foundation, and the Andrew David Heitman Neuroendovascular Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Brandon Westover.

Additional information

Deirdre O’Rourke and Patrick M. Chen contributed equally to this study.

On behalf of the Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium (CCEMRC).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Rourke, D., Chen, P.M., Gaspard, N. et al. Response Rates to Anticonvulsant Trials in Patients with Triphasic-Wave EEG Patterns of Uncertain Significance. Neurocrit Care 24, 233–239 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-015-0151-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-015-0151-8

Keywords

Navigation