Abstract
A sample of 60 children in Grade 3 was followed over one year. In the first year, an extensive battery of assessments was used including aspects of reading, arithmetic, and working memory. Teachers rated the children on 7-point scales on various motivational dimensions summarized to a total score tentatively called task orientation. In the follow-up assessment one year later, the testing and teacher ratings were repeated. The cross-sectional correlations between reading, arithmetic, and task orientation were all high (about +.70). The high correlation between reading and arithmetic decreased significantly when task orientation was partialed out, and it was further reduced when working memory as assessed by backward digit span was added to the controlling factors. Also, teacher ratings of cognitive ability and language development accounted for some of the common variance between reading and arithmetic. The correlation between task orientation and school achievement cannot be causally interpreted in cross-sectional designs. Some support for a “causal” hypothesis, however, was obtained in crosslagged correlation analyses indicating that task orientation in Grade 3 may have a causal impact on the level of performance in reading, and in arithmetic in Grade 4. Most likely, however, there is also a reciprocal relationship.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267.
Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2006). Develpmental dynamics between mathematical performance, task motivation, and teachers’ goals during the transition to primary school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 21–40.
Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. E., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105, 158–173.
Butterworth, B. (2003). Dyscalculia screener. London: NFER Nelson Publishing Company.
Cowan, R., Donlan, C., Newton, E. J., & Lloyd, D. (2005). Number skills and knowledge in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 732–744.
Craske, M. L. (1988). Learned helplessness, self-worth motivation, and attribution retraining for primary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 152–164.
Deater-Deckard, K., Petrill, S. A., Thompson, L. A., & DeThorne, L. (2005). A cross-sectional behavioural genetic analysis of task persistence in the transition to middle-childhood. Developmental Science, 8, F21-F26.
Dehaene, S., Molko, N., Cohen, L., & Wilson, A. J. (2004). Arithmetic and the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 218–224.
Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487–506.
Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1978). An analysis of learned helplessness. Continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 451–462.
Durand, M., Hulme, C., Larkin, R., & Snowling, M. (2005). The cognitive foundations of reading and arithmetic skills in 7- to 10-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 113–136.
Fisher, S. E., & Francks, C. (2006). Genes, cognition and dyslexia: Learning to read the genome. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 250–257.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Powell, S. R., Seetahler, P. M., Capizzi, A. M., Schatschneider, C., & Fletcher, J. M. (2006). The cognitive correlates of third-grade skill in arithmetic algorithmic computation, and arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 29–43.
Gathercole, S. E., Alloway, T. P., Willis, C., & Adams, A.-M. (2006). Working memory in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 265–281.
Gathercole, S. E., & Pickering, S. J. (2000). Assessment of working memory in six- and seven-year-old children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 377–390.
Gathercole, S. E., & Pickering, S. J. (2001). Working memory deficits in children with special educational needs. British Journal of Special Education, 28, 89–97.
Geary, D. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 4–15.
Gottfried, A. E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 525–538.
Hecht, S. A., Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (2001). The relations between phonological processing abilities and emerging individual differences in mathematical computation skills: A longitudinal study from second to fifth grades. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 192–227.
Isaacs, E. B., Edmonds. C. J., Lucas, A., & Gadian, D. G. (2001). Calculation difficulties in children of very low birthweight. Brain, 124, 1701–1707.
Kovas, Y., Harlaar, N., Petrill, S. A., & Plomin, R. (2005). “Generalist genes” and mathematics in 7-year-old twins. Intelligence, 33, 473–489.
Landerl, K., Bevan, A., & Butterworth, B. (2004). Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: A study of 8- to 9-year-old students. Cognition, 93, 99–125.
Lewis, C., Hitch, G. J., & Walker, P. (1994). The prevalence of specific arithmetic difficulties and specific reading difficulties in 9- to 10-year-old boys and girls. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 283–292.
Licht, B. G., & Dweck, C. S. (1984). Determinants of academic achievement: The interaction of children’s achievement orientation with skill area. Developmental Psychology, 20, 628–636.
Lundberg, I. (2001). Vilken bild är rätt? (Which picture is the correct one?) Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.
Miller Guron, L. (2000). The wordchains test. London: NFER Nelson Publishing Company.
Nicholls, J. G., Cheung, P. C., Lauer, J., & Patashnich, M. (1989). Individual differences in academic motivation: Perceived ability, goals, beliefs, and values. Learning and Individual Differences, 1, 63–84.
Onatsu-Arvilommi, T., & Nurmi, J. E. (2000). The role of task-avoidant and task-focused behaviors in the development of reading and mathematical skills during the first school year: A cross-lagged longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 478–491.
Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.
Plomin, R., & Kovas, Y. (2005). Generalist genes and learning disabilities. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 592–617.
Randhawa, B. S., Beamer, J. E., & Lundberg, I. (1993). Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the structural model of mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 41–48.
Rasmussen, C., & Bisanz, J. (2005). Representation and working memory in early arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 137–157.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
Sideridis, G. D., Morgan, P. L., Botsas, G., Padeliadu, S., & Fuchs, D. (2006). Predicting LD on the basis of motivation, metacognition, and psychopathology: An ROC analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 215–229.
Swedish National Board of Education. (1992). National assessment of mathematics, grade 3–5. Stockholm: Author.
Turkeltaub, P. E., Gareau, L., Flowers, D. L., Zeffiro, T. A., & Eden, G. F. (2003). Development of neural mechanisms for reading. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 767–773.
Uguroglu, M. E., & Walberg, H. J. (1979). Motivation and achievement: A quantitative synthesis. American Educational Research Journal, 16, 375–389.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lundberg, I., Sterner, G. Reading, arithmetic, and task orientation—How are they related?. Ann. of Dyslexia 56, 361–377 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-006-0016-0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-006-0016-0