Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic Conversion of Vertical Banded Gastroplasty (Mason MacLean) into Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Revision of bariatric procedures is required in 10 to 25% of patients either for insufficient weight loss or for complications. Patients undergoing vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG; Mason MacLean) may require revision in up to half of the cases in the long term. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is considered the procedure of choice for revision of VBG gastroplasty.

Patients and Methods

Eighteen patients, 16 women and 2 men with a mean age of 41.7 years (range 27–72) and a mean BMI at 37.6 kg/m2 (range 22.5–47), underwent laparoscopic conversion of VBG into RYGBP. Indications for revisional surgery were insufficient weight loss (11 patients), stoma stenosis (4 patients), and acid reflux (3 patients).

Results

Operative time was on average 203 min (range 60–300 min), and conversion was required in one patient (5.5%). There was no early postoperative mortality, and four patients (22.2%) developed immediate postoperative complications (gastrojejunostomy leak 1; stenosis of the gastrojejunal anastomosis 2; liver abscess 1). One patient died 6 months after conversion because of a bleeding anastomotic ulcer (late mortality 5.5%). Two patients (11.5%) developed late complications (incisional hernia 1; internal hernia 1). At a mean follow-up of 23, 4 months BMI is on average 29.8 kg/m2 (range 22.7–37).

Conclusion

Although revision of failed VBG into RYGBP gives good functional results, the risk of postoperative serious complications must be carefully evaluated before revision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marema RT, Perez M, Buffington CK. Comparison of the benefits and complications between laparoscopic and open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgeries. Surg Endosc 2005;19:525–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hwang RF, Swartz DE, Felix EL. Causes of small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 2004;18:1631–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, et al. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1625–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Calle EE, Teras LR, Thun MJ. Obesity and mortality. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2197–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg 2001;234:279–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Flegal KM, Carrol MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA 2002;288:1723–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen NT, Root J, Zainabadi K. Accelerated growth of bariatric surgery with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery. Arch Surg 2005;140:1198–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buchwald H, Williams SE. Bariatric surgery world-wide 2003. Obes Surg 2004;14:1157–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. NIH Conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus development conference panel. Ann Intern Med 1991;115:956–61.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buckwalter JA, Herbst CA, Khouri RK. Morbid obesity second gastric operations for poor weight loss. Am Surg 1985;51:208–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fakhry SA, Herbst CA, Buckwalter JA. Complications requiring operative intervention after gastric bariatric surgery. South Med J 1985;78:536–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Gemert WG, Van Wersch MM, Greve JWM, et al. Revisional surgery after failed vertical banded gastroplasty: restoration of vertical banded gastroplasty or conversion to gastric bypass. Obes Surg 1998;8:21–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DeMaria EJ. Is gastric bypass superior for the surgical treatment of obesity compared with malabsorptive procedures? J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8:401–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schauer PR, et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg 2000.

  15. Martin MJ, Mullenix PS, Steel SR, et al. A case-match analysis of prior failed bariatric procedures converted to resectional gastric bypass. Am J Surg 2004;187:666–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ortega J, Sala F, Flor B, et al. Vertical banded gastroplasty converted to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: little impact on nutritional status after 5-year follow-up. Obes Surg 2004;14:638–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones KB. Revisional bariatric surgery—potentially safe and effective. Surg Obes Rel Dis 2005;1:599–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. de Csepel J, Nahouraii R, Gagner M. Laparoscopic gastric bypass as a reoperative bariatric surgery for failed open restrictive procedures. Surg Endosc 2001;15:393–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gagner M, Gentileschi P, de Csepel J, et al. Laparoscopic reoperative bariatric surgery: experience from 27 consecutive patients. Obes Surg 2002;12:254–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Calmes JM, Giusti V, Suter M. Reoperative laparoscopic Rou-en-Y gastric bypass: an experience with 49 cases. Obes Surg 2005;15:316–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cohen R, Pinheiro JS, Correa JL, Schiavon C. Laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery. Myths and facts. Surg Endosc 2005;19:822–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McCormick JT, Papasavas PK, Caushaj PF, Gagné DJ. Laparoscopic revision of failed open bariatric procedures. Surg Endosc 2003;17:413–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Khaitan L, Van Sicjle K, Gonzalez R, Lin E, Ramshaw B, Smith CD. Laparoscopic revision of bariatric procedures: is it feasible? Am Surg 2005;71:6–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Iannelli A, Addeo P, Dahman M, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of vertical banded gastroplasty with an antireflux wrap into Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2007;17:901–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang W, Huang MT, wei PL, Chiu CC, Lee WJ. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass for failed vertical banded gastroplasty. Obes Surg 2004;14:777–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gavert N, Szold A, Abu-Abeid S. Laparoscopic revisional surgery for life-threatening stenosis following vertical banded gastroplasty, together with placement of an adjustable gastric band. Obes Surg 2003;13:399–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McCormick JT, Papasavas PK, Caushaj PF, Gagné DJ. Laparoscopic revision of failed open bariatric procedures. Surg Endosc 2003;17:413–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Deitel M, Khanna RK, Hagen J, et al. Vertical banded gastroplasty as an antireflux procedure. Am J Surg 1988;155:512–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Balsiger BM, Murr MM, Mai J, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux after intact vertical banded gastroplasty: correction by conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4:276–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mouiel J, Bourg S, Iannelli A, Andreani P, Rossetti G. Nouvelle technique de gastroplastie verticale calibrée type Mason-Mac Lean avec cure de reflux gastro-oesophagien. Journal de Coelio Chirurgie 2001;38:53–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Iannelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iannelli, A., Amato, D., Addeo, P. et al. Laparoscopic Conversion of Vertical Banded Gastroplasty (Mason MacLean) into Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. OBES SURG 18, 43–46 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9255-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9255-3

Keywords

Navigation