Skip to main content
Log in

A New Approach for Predicting the Final Outcome of Evolution Strategy Optimization Under Noise

  • Published:
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Differential-geometric methods are applied to derive steady state conditions for the (μ/μ I ,λ)-ES on the general quadratic test function disturbed by fitness noise of constant strength. A new approach for estimating the expected final fitness deviation observed under such conditions is presented. The theoretical results obtained are compared with real ES runs, showing a surprisingly excellent agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. V. Arnold, Noisy Optimization with Evolution Strategies. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. V. Arnold and H.-G. Beyer, “Performance analysis of evolution strategies with multi-recombination in high-dimensional RN-search spaces disturbed by noise,” Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 289, pp. 629–647, 2002.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. D. V. Arnold and H.-G. Beyer, “A comparison of evolution strategies with other direct search methods in the presence of noise,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 24, pp. 135–159, 2003.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Bäck, U. Hammel, and H.-P Schwefel, “Evolutionary computation: Comments on the history and current state,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H.-G. Beyer, “Toward a theory of evolution strategies: Some asymptotical results from the (1,+λ)-theory,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 165–188, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H.-G. Beyer. “Evolutionary algorithms in noisy environments: Theoretical issues and guidelines for practice,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 186, no. 2–4, pp. 239–267, 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. H.-G. Beyer. The Theory of Evolution Strategies. Natural Computing Series. Springer: Heidelberg, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H.-G. Beyer and D. V. Arnold, “Fitness noise and localization errors of the optimum in general quadratic fitness models,” in GECCO-99: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, W. Banzhaf, J. Daida, A. E. Eiben, M. H. Garzon, V. Honavar, M. Jakiela, and R. E. Smith (Eds.), Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco, CA, 1999, pp. 817–824.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H.-G. Beyer and D. V. Arnold, “The steady state behavior of (μ/μI, λ)-ES on ellipsoidal fitness models disturbed by noise,” in GECCO-2003: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, E. Cantú-Paz et al. (Eds.), Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2003, pp. 525–536.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H.-G. Beyer and D. V Arnold, “Qualms regarding the optimality of cumulative path length control in CSA/CMA-evolution strategies,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 2003.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. H.-G. Beyer and K. Deb, “On self-adaptive features in real-parameter evolutionary algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 250–270, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H.-G. Beyer, M. Olhofer, and B. Sendhoff, “On the behavior of (μ/μ I , λ)-ES optimizing functions disturbed by generalized noise,” in Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, K. De Jong, R. Poli, and J. Rowe, (Eds.), Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco, CA, 2003, vol. 7, pp. 307–328.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Branke, Evolutionary Optimization in Dynamic Environments, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier, “Adapting arbitrary normal mutation distributions in evolution strategies: The covariance matrix adaptation,” in Proceedings of 1996 IEEE Int’l Conf. on Evolutionary Computation (ICEC’96), IEEE Press: NY, 1996, pp. 312–317.

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier, “Convergence properties of evolution strategies with the derandomized covariance matrix adaptation: The (μ/μ I , λ)-CMA-ES,” in 5th European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing (EUFIT’97), H.-J. Zimmermann (Ed.), Verlag Mainz: Aachen, Germany, 1997, pp. 650–654.

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier, “Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 159–195, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Ostermeier, A. Gawelczyk, and N. Hansen, “A derandomized approach to self-adaptation of evolution strategies,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 369–380, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. I. Rechenberg, Evolutionsstrategie ‘94, Frommann-Holzboog Verlag: Stuttgart, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H.-P. Schwefel, Numerical Optimization of Computer Models, Wiley: Chichester, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Tsutsui and A. Ghosh, “Genetic algorithms with a robust solution searching scheme,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 201–208, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Wiesmann, U. Hammel, and T. Bäck, “Robust design of multilayer optical coatings by means of evolutionary algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 162–167, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-George Beyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beyer, HG., Arnold, D.V. & Meyer-Nieberg, S. A New Approach for Predicting the Final Outcome of Evolution Strategy Optimization Under Noise. Genet Program Evolvable Mach 6, 7–24 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10710-005-7617-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10710-005-7617-y

Keywords

Navigation