Skip to main content
Log in

Review of the management of recurrent inguinal hernia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: There is little available evidence on the optimal management of recurrent inguinal hernia, particularly if the original procedure involved the use of mesh. This study was a review of recurrent hernia repair in a district hospital, involving both laparoscopic and open procedures. Methods: The case notes of all patients who had a repair of a recurrent hernia between 1991 and 2000, inclusive, were examined; 171 procedures were included. Where known, the original repair was a nylon darn in 31%, mesh repair in 18%, and laparoscopic repair in 8%. Results: The recurrent hernia was repaired using a Lichtenstein open mesh technique in 63% and by the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) method in 22%. Complication rates were highest after emergency surgery (all had open surgery), where 71% had complications and one patient died. For elective repairs, complication rates were similar after open (13%) and TEP (8%) repairs. The duration of hospital stay was also similar (1.2 vs 1.3 days, respectively), and a single recurrence was seen in each group. Patients with recurrence after primary mesh repair were also managed by both techniques with similar results. Open re-operation for mesh failure was technically straightforward. Conclusions: Most recurrent hernias are still repaired by open techniques. There was no convincing evidence of different outcomes for open and TEP repairs in this review. Even when the original hernia repair involved the use of mesh, further open repair by an experienced surgeon is justified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2000) Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 87:860–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. The EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2002) Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh. Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Ann Surg 235:322–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. The EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2002) Open mesh vs non-mesh repair of groin hernia meta-analysis of randomized trials based on individual patient data. Hernia 6:130–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. The EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2002) Laparoscopic vs open groin hernia repair: meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data. Hernia 6:2-10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. National Institute of Clinical Excellence (2000) Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of laparoscopic vs open repair of inguinal hernia. London: NICE

  6. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, Kark AE, Kurzer M, Waters KJ (2001) Guidance on the use of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia. London: NICE

  7. Richards SK, Earnshaw JJ (2003) Management of primary and recurrent inguinal hernia by surgeons from the South West of England. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85:402–404

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barrat C, Surlin V, Bordea A, Champault G (2003) Management of recurrent inguinal hernias: a prospective study of 163 cases. Hernia 7:125–129

    Google Scholar 

  9. Motson RW (2002) Why does NICE not recommend laparoscopic herniorraphy? BMJ 324:1092–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bay-Nielsen M, Nordin P, Nilsson E, Kehlet H (2001) Operative findings in recurrent hernia after a Lichtenstein procedure. Am J Surg 182:134–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Amid PK (2003) The Lichtenstein repair in 2002: an overview of causes of recurrence after Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty. Hernia 7:13–16

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beets GL, Dirkson CD, Go PM, Geisler FE, Baeten CG, Kootstra G (1999) Open or laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernia? A randomised controlled trial. Surg Endosc 13:323–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mokete MM, Earnshaw JJ (2001) Evolution of a hernia surgery practice. Postgrad Med J 77:188–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Dwyer PJ, Serpell MG, Millar K, et al. (2003) Local or general anesthesia for open hernia repair: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 237:547–549

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bloor K, Freemantle N, Khadjesari Z, Maynard A (2003) Impact of NICE guidance on Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernias: analysis of interrupted time series. BMJ 326:578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank their consultant colleagues for permission to publish details about patients admitted under their care.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. J. Earnshaw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richards, S.K., Vipond, M.N. & Earnshaw, J.J. Review of the management of recurrent inguinal hernia. Hernia 8, 144–148 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-003-0194-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-003-0194-1

Keywords

Navigation