Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Meta-analysis comparing locking plate fixation with hemiarthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There remains no consensus on the surgical treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures. In this meta-analysis, we pool available trials to compare the clinical outcomes of locking plate fixation and hemiarthroplasty for this injury.

Methods

A literature search between January 1990 and May 2012 in the main medical search engines (Pubmed, Medline, Embase search, and the Cochrane library) was included. We selected available trials that compared locking plate fixation and hemiarthroplasty in patients with complex proximal humeral fractures and that reported on functional outcomes, revisions, and method-related complications. The quality of the studies was assessed, and meta-analyses were performed with the Cochrane Collaboration’s REVMAN 5.0 software.

Results

A total of 567 patients from 9 trials were included in this meta-analysis (302 fractures treated with locking plate and 265 with hemiarthroplasty). In this comparison, we found that patients with locking plate fixation had better Constant–Murley score than with hemiarthroplasty, and hemiarthroplasty could reduce the rate of revisions and the method-related complications significantly.

Conclusions

Compared with hemiarthroplasty, patients with locking plate fixation could obtain more favorable functional outcomes, but technical detail was critical to minimize the risk of implant failure, avascular necrosis, and re-operation. As the possible significant bias and inconclusive evidence arising from the included trials, further randomized trials and observational studies should be recommended to support these finding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B (2006) Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 37(8):691–697. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lind T, Kroner K, Jensen J (1989) The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 108(5):285–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Neer CS 2nd (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(6):1090–1103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Neer CS 2nd (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(6):1077–1089

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Handoll HH, Ollivere BJ (2010) Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8(12):CD000434. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub2

    Google Scholar 

  6. Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM (2007) Two-part fractures and fracture dislocations. Hand Clin 23(4):397–414. doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2007.08.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Murray IR, Amin AK, White TO, Robinson CM (2011) Proximal humeral fractures: current concepts in classification, treatment and outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(1):1–11. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.25702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sudkamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P, Voigt C, Oestern H, Kaab M, Luo C, Plecko M, Wendt K, Kostler W, Konrad G (2009) Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(6):1320–1328. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jobin CM, Galatz LM (2012) Proximal humerus fractures: pin, plate, or replace? Semin Arthroplasty 23(2):74–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-13

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50(4):1088–1101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dietrich M, Meier C, Lattmann T, Zingg U, Gruninger P, Platz A (2008) Complex fracture of the proximal humerus in the elderly. Locking plate osteosynthesis vs hemiarthroplasty. Chirurg 79(3):231–240. doi:10.1007/s00104-007-1436-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bastian JD, Hertel R (2009) Osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty of fractures of the proximal humerus: outcomes in a consecutive case series. J Should Elbow Surg 18(2):216–219. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2008.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP, Paiement GD (2009) Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(7):1689–1697. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang DL, Ruan DK, Yin Q, Li HF, Wang PJ, He Q (2009) Surgical treatment for complicated proximal humeral fractures and analysis of efficacy. Chin J Bone Joint Injury 24(11):985–987

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang J, Di Z, He Z, Feng J, Xu R (2010) Comparison of humeral head replacement and internal fixation for the treatment of 3 parts and 4 parts fractures of proximal humerus in the elderly]. China J Orthop Traumatol 23(6):435

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kim DS, Lee DK, Yi CH, Park JH, Rah JH (2011) Comparison of results between internal plate fixation and hemiarthroplasty in comminuted proximal humerus fracture. J Korean Fract Soc 24(2):144–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wild JR, DeMers A, French R, Shipps MR, Bergin PF, Musapatika D, Jelen BA (2011) Functional outcomes for surgically treated 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures. Orthopedics 34(10):e629–e633. doi:10.3928/01477447-20110826-14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lu J, Zhou TM (2012) Comparative research of the outcomes after two different methods for treatment of four-part proximal humerus fractures. J Pract Orthop 18(2):115–117

    Google Scholar 

  22. Spross C, Platz A, Erschbamer M, Lattmann T, Dietrich M (2012) Surgical treatment of Neer group VI proximal humeral fractures: retrospective comparison of PHILOS((R)) and hemiarthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(7):2035–2042. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-2207-1

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zyto K, Wallace WA, Frostick SP, Preston BJ (1998) Outcome after hemiarthroplasty for three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Should Elbow Surg 7(2):85–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. van de Water AT, Shields N, Taylor NF (2011) Outcome measures in the management of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of their use and psychometric properties. J Should Elbow Surg 20(2):333–343. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.10.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nijs S, Broos P (2009) Outcome of shoulder hemiarthroplasty in acute proximal humeral fractures: a frustrating meta-analysis experience. Acta Orthop Belg 75(4):445–451

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Misra A, Kapur R, Maffulli N (2001) Complex proximal humeral fractures in adults—a systematic review of management. Injury 32(5):363–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lanting B, MacDermid J, Drosdowech D, Faber KJ (2008) Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities. J Should Elbow Surg 17(1):42–54. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schliemann B, Siemoneit J, Theisen C, Kosters C, Weimann A, Raschke MJ (2012) Complex fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly-outcome and complications after locking plate fixation. Musculoskelet Surg 96(Suppl 1):S3–S11. doi:10.1007/s12306-012-0181-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brorson S, Frich LH, Winther A, Hrobjartsson A (2011) Locking plate osteosynthesis in displaced 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Acta Orthop 82(4):475–481. doi:10.3109/17453674.2011.588856

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brunner F, Sommer C, Bahrs C, Heuwinkel R, Hafner C, Rillmann P, Kohut G, Ekelund A, Muller M, Audige L, Babst R (2009) Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate: a prospective multicenter analysis. J Orthop Trauma 23(3):163–172. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181920e5b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Krappinger D, Bizzotto N, Riedmann S, Kammerlander C, Hengg C, Kralinger FS (2011) Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Injury 42(11):1283–1288. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.01.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hente R, Kampshoff J, Kinner B, Fuchtmeier B, Nerlich M (2004) Treatment of dislocated 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus with an angle-stabilizing fixation plate. Unfallchirurg 107(9):769–782. doi:10.1007/s00113-004-0818-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Helwig P, Bahrs C, Epple B, Oehm J, Eingartner C, Weise K (2009) Does fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis solve the problems of a fractured proximal humerus? A prospective series of 87 patients. Acta Orthop 80(1):92–96

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Thanasas C, Kontakis G, Angoules A, Limb D, Giannoudis P (2009) Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: a systematic review. J Should Elbow Surg 18(6):837–844. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Boileau P, Pennington SD, Alami G (2011) Proximal humeral fractures in younger patients: fixation techniques and arthroplasty. J Should Elbow Surg 20(2 Suppl):S47–S60. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fialka C, Stampfl P, Arbes S, Reuter P, Oberleitner G, Vecsei V (2008) Primary hemiarthroplasty in four-part fractures of the proximal humerus: randomized trial of two different implant systems. J Should Elbow Surg 17(2):210–215. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kralinger F, Schwaiger R, Wambacher M, Farrell E, Menth-Chiari W, Lajtai G, Hubner C, Resch H (2004) Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. A retrospective multicentre study of 167 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(2):217–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Greiner SH, Diederichs G, Kroning I, Scheibel M, Perka C (2009) Tuberosity position correlates with fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff after hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures. J Should Elbow Surg 18(3):431–436. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2008.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS, Mole D (2002) Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Should Elbow Surg 11(5):401–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Mighell MA, Kolm GP, Collinge CA, Frankle MA (2003) Outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus. J Should Elbow Surg 12(6):569–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sirveaux F, Roche O, Mole D (2010) Shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fracture. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96(6):683–694. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2010.07.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, Petticrew M, Altman DG (2003) Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 7(27):iii–x, 1–173

    Google Scholar 

  44. Simillis C, Constantinides VA, Tekkis PP, Darzi A, Lovegrove R, Jiao L, Antoniou A (2007) Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resections for benign and malignant neoplasms—a meta-analysis. Surgery 141(2):203–211. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2006.06.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

There are no disclosures or conflicts of interest for either author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, JiaoTong University, No. 600 YiShan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China

    Jiezhi Dai, Yimin Chai, Chunyang Wang & Gen Wen

Authors
  1. Jiezhi Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yimin Chai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chunyang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gen Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yimin Chai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dai, J., Chai, Y., Wang, C. et al. Meta-analysis comparing locking plate fixation with hemiarthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24, 305–313 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1179-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1179-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation