Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic repair of suprapubic hernias: transabdominal partial extraperitoneal (TAPE) technique

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Suprapubic hernias are considered difficult to repair laparoscopically due to deficient posterior rectus sheath and proximity to important neurovascular structures and the urinary bladder.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 72 patients (18 males, 54 females) who, between 1998 and 2008, had undergone laparoscopic repair for suprapubic hernial defects located less than 5 cm from the pubic arch. Five patients (6.9%) had recurrent hernias. A peritoneal flap was dissected distally to facilitate a mesh overlap of at least 5 cm from the hernial defect. The lower margin of the mesh was fixed under direct vision to Cooper’s ligaments bilaterally. The raised peritoneal flap was reattached to the anterior abdominal wall thereby partially extraperitonealizing the mesh.

Results

Mean diameter of the hernial defect was 5.2 cm (range = 3.1–7.3 cm) as measured intraperitoneally. Mean size of the mesh used was 328.8 cm2 (range = 225–506 cm2). Mean operating time was 116 min (range = 64–170 min). Overall complication rate was 27.8%. There were no conversions. No recurrences were observed at a mean follow-up of 4.8 years (range = 1.2–6.9 years) and a follow-up rate of 84.7%

Conclusion

A mesh overlap of at least 5 cm and fixation of the lower margin of the mesh under direct vision to Cooper’s ligaments appears to confer increased strength and durability and contribute to low hernia recurrence rates in patients with suprapubic hernias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shell DH IV, de la Torre J, Andrades P, Vasconez LO (2008) Open repair of ventral incisional hernias. Surg Clin North Am 88:61–83

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bucknall TE, Cox PJ, Ellis H (1982) Burst abdomen and incisional hernia: a prospective study of 1129 major laparotomies. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 284(6320):931–933

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mudge M, Hughes LE (1985) Incisional hernia: a ten year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 72:70–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Carbonell AM, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Cobb WS, Heniford BT (2005) The laparoscopic repair of suprapubic ventral hernias. Surg Endosc 19:174–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Varnell B, Bachman S, Quick J, Vitamvas M, Ramshaw B, Oleynikov D (2008) Morbidity associated with laparoscopic repair of suprapubic hernias. Am J Surg 196:983–987; discussion 987–988

    Google Scholar 

  6. Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, Parthasarathi R, Madankumar MV, Senthilkumar K (2008) Laparoscopic repair of suprapubic incisional hernias: suturing and intraperitoneal composite mesh onlay. A retrospective study. Hernia 12:251–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bendavid R (1990) Incisional parapubic hernias. Surgery 108:98–901

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hirasa T, Pickleman J, Shayani V (2001) Laparoscopic repair of parapubic hernia. Arch Surg 136:1314–1317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Luijendijk RW, Jeekel J, Storm RK, Schutte PJ, Hop WC, Drogendijk AC, Huikeshoven FJ (1997) The low transverse Pfannenstiel incision and the prevalence of incisional hernia and nerve entrapment. Ann Surg 225:365–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Griffiths DA (1976) A reappraisal of the Pfannenstiel incision. Br J Urol 48:469–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Luijendijk RW, Lemmen MH, Hop WC, Wereldsma JC (1997) Incisional hernia recurrence following “vest-over-pants” or vertical Mayo repair of primary hernias of the midline. World J Surg 21:62–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hesselink VJ, Luijendijk RW, Wilt JH, Heide R, Jeekel J (1993) Incisional hernia recurrence; an evaluation of risk factors. Surg Gynecol Obstet 176:228–234

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Conze J (1998) Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall. Eur J Surg 164:951–960

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Klinge U, Conze B, Klosterhalfen B (1996) Changes in abdominal wall mechanics after mesh implantation: experimental changes in mesh stability. Langenbecks Arch Chir 381:323–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chowbey PK, Sharma A, Mehrotra M, Khullar R, Soni V, Baijal M (2006) Laparoscopic repair of ventral/incisional hernias. J Minim Access Surg 2:192–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI, Reed WP (1998) Long term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernia. Arch Surg 133:378–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

A. Sharma, A. Dey, R. Khullar, V. Soni, M. Baijal, and P. K. Chowbey have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, A., Dey, A., Khullar, R. et al. Laparoscopic repair of suprapubic hernias: transabdominal partial extraperitoneal (TAPE) technique. Surg Endosc 25, 2147–2152 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1513-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1513-0

Keywords

Navigation