Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Standardised fluorescence in situ hybridisation in cytological and histological specimens

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) has gained major impact in the detection of chromosomal aberrations. The application of FISH, however, is hampered due to complicated protocols. We therefore designed a FISH protocol that allows the fast and reliable application on cytological and histological specimens. Cytological and histological specimens of bone marrow, lymph nodes, liver and breast were analysed with 14 sets of centromere or locus-specific probes. A pretreatment of enzymatic digestion and microwave heating with the same incubation times for all specimens and probes used was performed. Hybridisation efficiency was proved by calculating the thresholds for monosomy, trisomy and translocations. Values in cytological specimens reached 9.0, 3.9 and 4.6%, respectively. In histological sections, values of 6.4% were seen for aneusomy and 3.1% for translocations. However, values for monosomy reached 20.5% in bone marrow and 61.8% in liver tissues due to cutting artifacts. In bone marrow with acute myeloid leukaemias, lymph nodes with follicular and mantle cell lymphomas, breast carcinomas and liver cell carcinomas, FISH confirmed aberrations already found using conventional cytogenetics. The protocol shown here is easy to perform and can be used with cytological and histological specimens. Moreover, with “hands on” time of less than 2 h, FISH can also be used for daily routine purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bardi G, Johansson B, Pandis N, Heim S, Mandahl N, Andren SA, Hagerstrand I, Mitelman F (1992) Cytogenetic findings in three primary hepatocellular carcinomas. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 58:191–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell LJ, Challis J, Fok T, Garson OM (1991) Chromosome 16 abnormalities associated with myeloid malignancies. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 3:55–61

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cattoretti G, Pileri S, Parravicini C, Becker MHG, Poggi S, Bilfulco C (1993) Antigen unmasking on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. J Pathol 171:83–98

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chin SF, Daigo Y, Huang H, Iyer NG, Callagy G, Kranjac T, Gonzalez M, Sangan T, Earl H, Caldas C (2003) A simple and reliable pretreatment protocol facilitates fluorescent in situ hybridisation on tissue microarrays of paraffin wax embedded tumour samples. J Clin Pathol Mol Pathol 56:275–279

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dowsett M, Bartlett J, Ellis IO, Salter J, Hills M, Mallon E, Watters AD, Cooke T, Paish C, Wencyk PM, Pinder SE (2003) Correlation between immunohistochemistry (HercepTest) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER-2 in 426 breast carcinomas from 37 centres. J Pathol 199:418–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Feller A, Diebold J (2004): Histopathology of nodal and extranodal non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gosden CM, Davidson C, Robertson M (1992) Human cytogenetics: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gunawan B, Huber W, Holtrup M, von Heydebreck A, Efferth T, Poustka A, Ringert RH, Jakse G, Fuzesi L (2001): Prognostic impacts of cytogenetic findings in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: gain of 5q31-qter predicts a distinct clinical phenotype with favorable prognosis. Cancer Res 61:7731–7738

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Haralambieva E, Kleiverda K, Mason DY, Schuuring E, and Kluin PM (2002) Detection of three common translocation breakpoints in non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas by fluorescence in situ hybridization on routine paraffin-embedded tissue sections. J Pathol 198:163–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leers MP, Schutte B, Theunissen PH, Ramaekers FC, Nap M (1999) Heat pretreatment increases resolution in DNA flow cytometry of paraffin-embedded tumor tissue. Cytometry 35:260–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McGhee JD, von Hippel PH (1977) Formaldehyde as a probe of DNA Structure. 4. Mechanisms of the initial reaction of formaldehyde with DNA. Biochemistry 16:3276–3293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mitelman F (1994) Catalog of chromosome aberrations in cancer. Wiley-Liss, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nolte M, Werner M, Ewig M, von Wasielewski R, Wilkens L, Georgii A (1995) Demonstration of the Philadelphia translocation by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in paraffin sections and identification of aberrant cells by a combined FISH/immunophenotyping approach. Histopathology 26:433–437

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nowell PC, Hungerford DA (2003) A minute chromosome in human chronic granulocytic leukemia. Science 132:1497

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pinkel D, Straume T, Gray JW (1986) Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83:2934–2938

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Richter J, Jiang F, Gorog JP, Sartorius G, Egenter C, Gasser TC, Moch H, Mihatsch MJ, Sauter G (1997) Marked genetic differences between stage pTa and stage pT1 papillary bladder cancer detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res 57:2860–2864

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rowley JD (1990) Recurring chromosome abnormalities in leukemia and lymphoma. Semin Hematol 27:122–136

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saito H, Morizane T, Watanabe T, Kagawa T, Iwabuchi MN, Kumagai N, Inagaki Y, Tsuchimoto K, Tsuchiya M (1989) Establishment of a human cell line (HCC-T) from a patient with hepatoma bearing no evidence of hepatitis B or A virus infection. Cancer 64:1054–1060

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi SR, Key ME, Kalra KL (1991) Antigen retrieval in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues; an enhancement method for immunohistochemical staining based on microwave oven heating of tissue sections. J Histochem Cytochem 39:741–748

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. von Wasielewski R, Werner M, Nolte M, Wilkens L, Georgii A (1994) Effects of antigen retrieval by microwave heating in formalin-fixed tissue sections on a broad panel of antibodies. Histochemistry 102:165–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ward BE, Gersen SL, Carelli MP, McGuire NM, Dackowski WR, Weinstein M, Sandlin C, Warren R, Klinger KW (1993) Rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aneuploidies by fluorescence in situ hybridization: clinical experience with 4,500 specimens. Am J Hum Genet 52:854–865

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilkens L, Bredt M, Flemming P, Schwarze Y, Becker T, Mengel M, von Wasielewski R, Klempnauer J, Kreipe H (2001): Diagnostic impact of fluorescence in situ hybridization in the differentiation of hepatocellular adenoma and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. J Mol Diagnostics 3:68–73

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilkens L, von Wasielewski R, Werner M, Nolte M, Georgii A (1996) Microwave pretreatment improves RNA-FISH in various formalin-fixed tissues using a uniform protocol. Pathol Res Pract 192:588–594

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ludwig Wilkens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilkens, L., Gerr, H., Gadzicki, D. et al. Standardised fluorescence in situ hybridisation in cytological and histological specimens. Virchows Arch 447, 586–592 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-005-1211-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-005-1211-9

Keywords

Navigation