Abstract
Purpose
To investigate perinatal outcomes in late primiparous women aged 35–39 and ≥40 years. Our main research question: “Was the rate of cesarean section similar between these 2 groups of advanced maternal age?”
Methods
Primiparous women aged ≥35 years, who delivered in our center between April 2004 and March 2007, were enrolled in this study. They were divided into two groups: women aged 35–39 years and those aged ≥40 years. Antenatal complications, deliveries, and neonatal outcomes were analyzed. Fetal abnormalities, abortions, and multiple gestations were excluded.
Results
We assessed 752 cases (35–39 years, 610 cases; ≥40 years, 142 cases). Incidence of cesarean section (CS) was significantly higher in pregnant women aged ≥40 years (P < 0.01). The CS rate amounted to 50.0% of all deliveries in this age group. Among patients with labor deliveries, the CS rate was also significantly higher in the older age group (P < 0.05). With regard to indication for CS with labor deliveries, the rate of non-progressive labor/dystocia was 19.4% in primiparous women aged ≥40 years and 11.0% in those aged 35–39 years, respectively (P < 0.05). In contrast, the rates of antenatal complications were not different between the two groups, except for gestational diabetes or leiomyoma. No significant differences between the two groups could be found for neonatal outcomes such as birth weight, Apgar score, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit.
Conclusions
CS rate was 50.0% in primiparous women aged ≥40 years. In addition, CS caused by dystocia was almost twice as frequent in primiparous women aged ≥40 years as in women aged 35–39 years. Among late pregnancies, primiparous women aged 40 years and older had higher risk of CS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
National Statistics Center (2009) Special report of vital statistics. Tokyo, Japan. http://www.e-stat.go.jp/SG1/estat/eStatTopPortal.do
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson ML (2006) Birth: final data for 2004. National Vital Statistics Reports 55. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville
Montan S (2007) Increased risk in the elderly parturient. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19:110–112. doi:10.1097/GCO.0b013e3280825603
Cleary-Goldman J, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH et al (2005) Impact of maternal age on obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol 105:983–990. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000158118.75532.51
Ecker JL, Chen KT, Cohen AP, Riley LE, Lieberman ES (2001) Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:883–887
Ziadeh SM (2002) Maternal and perinatal outcome in nulliparous woman aged 35 and older. Gynecol Obstet Invest 54:6–10. doi:10.1067/mob.2001.117364
Berkowitz GS, Skovron ML, Lapinski RH, Berkowitz RL (1990) Delayed childbearing and the outcome of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 322:659–664. doi:10.1056/NEJM199003083221004
Bahtivar MO, Funai EF, Rosenberg V, Norwitz E, Lipkind H, Buhimschi C, Copel JA (2008) Stillbirth at term in women of advanced maternal age in the United States: when could the antenatal testing be initiated? Am J Perinatol 25:301–304. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1076605
Miller DA (2005) Is advanced maternal age an independent factor for uteroplacental insufficiency? Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1974–1982. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.050
Aldous M, Edmonson M (1993) Maternal age at first childbirth and risk of low birth weight and preterm delivery in Washington State. JAMA 270:2574–2577. doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03510210060028
Gilbert WM, Nesbitt TS, Danielsen B (1999) Childbearing beyond age 40: pregnancy outcome in 24,032 cases. Obstet Gynecol 93:9–14
Luke B, Brown MB (2007) Elevated risks of pregnancy complications and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age. Hum Reprod 22:1264–1272. doi:10.1093/humrep/del522
Ziadeh S, Yahaya A (2001) Pregnancy outcome at age 40 and older. Arch Gynecol Obstet 265:30–33. doi:10.1007/s004040000122
Callaway LK, Lust K, McIntyre HD (2005) Pregnancy outcomes in women of very advanced maternal age. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45:12–16. doi:10.1111/j.1479-828X.2005.00333.x
Chan BC, Lao TT (2008) Effect of parity and advanced maternal age on obstetric outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 102:237–241. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.05.004
Ezra Y, McParland P, Farine D (1995) High delivery intervention rates in nulliparous women over age 35. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 62:203–207
Bianco A, Stone J, Lynch L, Lapinski R, Berkowitz G, Berkowitz RL (1996) Pregnancy outcome at age 40 and older. Obstet Gynecol 87:917–922. doi:10.1007/s004040000122
Wei SQ, Luo ZC, Qi HP, Xu H, Fraser WD (2009) High-dose vs low-dose oxytocin for labor augmentation: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:296–304. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.03.007
Jacobsson B, Ladfors L, Milsom I (2004) Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 104:727–733. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000140682.63746.be
Joseph KS, Allen AC, Dodds L, Turner LA, Scott H, Liston R (2005) The perinatal effects of delayed childbearing. Obstet Gynecol 105:1410–1418. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000163256.83313.36
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takahashi, H., Watanabe, N., Sugibayashi, R. et al. Increased rate of cesarean section in primiparous women aged 40 years or more: a single-center study in Japan. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285, 937–941 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2099-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2099-z