Abstract
Aim
To assess the response of Oswestry disability index (ODI) among patients undergoing caudal epidural steroid injections for lumbosacral radicular pain.
Methods
A total number of 107 consecutive patients were analysed. ODI was obtained at preassessment and then at 6 weeks post-injection. At follow-up, patients were asked to rate their condition on an ordinal scale as compared to pre-injection based on their response to five questions (much better, better, same, worse, much worse). As a measure of responsiveness, the effect size and standardized response mean (SRM) was calculated.
Results
The mean age of the cohort was 58 years. The mean duration of symptoms was 11 months. The mean Pre-injection ODI for 107 patients was 49(95% CI 46–52). The mean post-injection ODI at 6 weeks was 32(95% CI 28–35). The mean change in ODI was 16.9(95% CI 14–19). The mean change in ODI for much better or much worse group was 21.98(95% CI 18–25). The mean change in ODI for better or worse group was 15(95% CI 10–19) (P = 0.01). The mean change in ODI for same group was −0.6(95% CI −10 to 11). The effect size for the whole group was 1.05. The responsiveness as measured by SRM for the whole group was 0.84.
Conclusion
This study shows that ODI can detect small changes in disability over time in patients undergoing caudal epidural injections for lumbosacral radicular pain. It can also differentiate between small and large changes in the level of disability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker D, Pynsent P, Fairbank J (1989) The Oswestry disability index revisited. In: Roland M, Jenner J (eds) Back pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. Manchester University press, Manchester, pp 174–186
Fairbank J, Cooper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273
Fisher K, Johnson M (1997) Validation of the Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire, its sensitivity as a measure of change following treatment and its relationship with other aspects of chronic pain experience. Physiother Theory Pract 13:67–80
Chow JH, Chan CC (2005) Validation of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index. Work 25:307–314
Exner V, Keel P (2000) Measuring disability of patients with low-back pain—validation of a German version of the Roland & Morris disability questionnaire. Schmerz 14:392–400 (in German)
Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry disability index. Spine 25:2940–2953
Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C (2003) The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire:longitudinal construct validity and measuring self rated health after surgery. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord 4:1471–1474
Gronblad M, Hupli M, Wennerstrand P, Jarvinen E, Lukinmaa A, Kouri JP et al (1993) Intercorrelation and test retest reliability of the pain disability index (PDI) and Oswestry disability questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlationwith pain intensity in low back pain patients. Clin J Pain 9:189–195
Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD (2000) Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 53:459–468
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Changulani, M., Shaju, A. Evaluation of responsiveness of Oswestry low back pain disability index. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129, 691–694 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0653-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0653-3