Skip to main content
Log in

Intermittent breeding as a cost of site fidelity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intermittent breeding (skipping a breeding season) can be the result of an adaptive decision by a focal individual, trading current reproductive success in favour of future reproductive success (residual reproductive value hypothesis). In contrast, an individual can also be forced by conspecifics to abandon the familiar breeding site and refrain from breeding due to lack of suitable alternative breeding sites or mates (competition hypothesis). I studied intermittent breeding in the territorial and site-faithful Eurasian oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus, using a dataset covering 20 years. Intermittent breeding (in total 86 cases) occurred among breeders that formerly bred in high- as well as low-quality territories. The main factor associated with intermittent breeding in high-quality sites was death of a mate, while in low quality sites divorce was the most prominent factor. In 93% of the cases birds were forced to cease breeding due to pressure from conspecifics consistent with the competition hypothesis. There was no association between intermittent breeding and promotion to a territory of better quality. Instead, oystercatchers returned to breeding habitat of similar quality and at a very close distance (median distance 128 m) from the previous breeding location. Breeding absences lasted on average 2.4 years, with a maximum of 9 years, and the quality of the territory obtained after the absence varied with the duration of it. Birds who re-bred in a high-quality territory acquired this on average faster than those that re-bred in a low-quality territory, indicating that birds in high-quality sites are better competitors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams DC, Anthony CD (1996) Using randomization techniques to analyse behavioural data. Anim Behav 51:733–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aebischer NJ (1986) Retrospective investigation of an ecological disaster in the Shag, Phalacrocorax aristotelis: a general method based on long-term marking. J Anim Ecol 55:613–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aebischer NJ, Wanless S (1992) Relationships between colony size, adult non-breeding and environmental conditions for Shags Phalacrocorax aristotelis in the Isle of May, Scotland. Bird Study 39:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertram CGL, Lack D, Roberts BB (1934) Notes on East Greenland birds, with a discussion on the periodic non-breeding among arctic birds. Ibis 13:816–831

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekelheide RJ, Ainley DG (1989) Age, resource availability, and breeding effort in Brandt’s Cormorant. Auk 106:389–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruinzeel LW, van de Pol M (2004) Site attachment of floaters predicts success in territory acquisition. Behav Ecol 15:290–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruinzeel LW, van de Pol M, Trierweiler C (2006) Competitive abilities of oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) occupying territories of different quality. J Ornithol 147:457–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Cam E, Hines JE, Monnat JY, Nichols JD, Danchin E (1998) Are adult nonbreeders prudent parents? The kittiwake model. Ecology 79:1930–2917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cam E, Link WA, Cooch EG, Monnat JY, Danchin E (2002) Individual covariation in life-history traits: seeing the trees despite the forest. Am Nat 159:96–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catry P, Phillips RA, Hamer KC, Ratcliffe N, Furness RW (1998) The incidence of nonbreeding by adult Great Skuas and parasitic Jaegers from Foula, Shetland. Condor 100:448–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Chastel O, Weimerskirch H, Jouventin P (1993) High annual variability in reproductive success and survival of an Antarctic seabird, the Snow petrel Pagodroma nivea. A 27-year study. Oecologia 94:278–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson JC (1984) The population dynamics of the Eider Duck Somateria mollissima and evidence for extensive non-breeding by adult ducks. Ibis 126:525–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson JC, Thomas C (1985) Differences in the breeding performances of individual kittiwake gulls, Rissa tridactyla. In: Sibly RM, Smith RH (eds) Behavioural ecology: ecological consequences of adaptive behaviour. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 489–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Danchin E, Cam E (2002) Can non-breeding be a cost of breeding dispersal? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drent RH, Daan S (1980) The prudent parent: energetic adjustments in avian breeding. Ardea 68:225–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Ens BJ, Kersten M, Brenninkmeijer A, Hulscher JB (1992) Territory quality, parental effort and reproductive success of Oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus). J Anim Ecol 61:703–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ens BJ, Weissing FJ, Drent RH (1995) The despotic distribution and deferred maturity: two sides of the same coin. Am Nat 146:625–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikstad KE, Fauchald P, Tveraa T, Steen H (1998) On the cost of reproduction in long-lived birds: the influence of environmental variability. Ecology 79:1781–1788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris MP, Wanless S (1995) Survival and non-breeding of adult Common Guillemots Uria aalge. Ibis 137:192–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Heg D (1999) Life-history decisions in oystercatchers. Ph.D. Thesis University of Groningen, Groningen

  • Heg D, Ens BJ, Burke T, Kruijt JP (1993) Why does the typically monogamous Oystercatcher (Haematopus ostralegus) engage in extra-pair copulations? Behaviour 137:473–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heg D, Ens BJ, van der Jeugd HP, Bruinzeel LW (2000) Local dominance and territorial settlement of nonbreeding oystercatchers. Behaviour 137:473–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heg D, Bruinzeel LW, Ens B J (2003) Fitness consequences of divorce in the oystercatcher, Haematopus ostralegus. Anim Behav 66:175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulscher JB, Ens BJ (1992) Is the bill of the male Oystercatcher a better tool for attacking mussels than the bill of the female? Neth J Zool 42:85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmbach E, Ramsay SC, Wendeln H, Becker PH (2001) A study of neotropic cormorants in central Chile: possible effects of El Nino. Waterbirds 24:345–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten M (1996) Time and energy budgets of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus occupying territories of different quality. Ardea 84A:291–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen JM, Daan S (1990) Family planning in the Great Tit (Parus major): optimal clutch size as integration of parent and offspring fitness. Behaviour 114:161–190

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Pol M, Bruinzeel LW, Heg D, van der Jeugd HP, Verhulst S (2006) A silver spoon for a golden future: long term effects of natal origin on fitness prospects of oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus). J Anim Ecol 75:616–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Oers K, Heg D, Le Drean Quenec’hdu S (2002) Anthelminthic treatment negatively affects chick survival in the Eurasian Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus. Ibis 144:509–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst S, Tinbergen JM, Daan S (1997) Multiple breeding in the great tit; a trade-off between successive reproductive attempts? Funct Ecol 11:714–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst S, Oosterbeek K, Rutten AL, Ens BJ (2004) Shellfish fishery severely reduces condition and survival of oystercatchers despite creation of large marine protected areas. Ecol Soc 9(1):17

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1966) Natural selection, the cost of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack’s principle. Am Nat 100:687–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams M, McKinney F (1996) Long term monogamy in a river specialist—the Blue Duck. In: JM Black (ed) Partnerships in birds, the study of monogamy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 73–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwarts L, Hulscher JB, Koopman K, Zegers P (1996) Discriminating the sex of Oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus. Ardea 84A:1–12

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many people were involved in keeping the Schiermonnikoog-oystercatcher population study running over the years and skilled fieldworkers such as Allix Brenninkmeijer, Bruno Ens, Dik Heg, Jan Hulscher, Marcel Kersten, Kees van Oers, Kees Oosterbeek, Martijn van de Pol, and Simon Verhulst were crucial. Natuurmonumenten and especially Otto Overdijk gave us permission and support to carry out our fieldwork on Schiermonnikoog. Joost Tinbergen, Rudi Drent and two anonymous referees improved the manuscript. This publication was financed by a grant from Nwo-alw (90536124), a UCT post-doctoral research grant from the University of Cape Town, and a grant from NRF. Data reported in this study were based on non-invasive observations and the population study (including the marking of animals) was carried out under licence.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leo W. Bruinzeel.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Brown

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruinzeel, L.W. Intermittent breeding as a cost of site fidelity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61, 551–556 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0283-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0283-0

Keywords

Navigation