Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The utilization of pediatric computed tomography in a large Israeli Health Maintenance Organization

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Concern has been raised about the potential risks related to radiation exposure from CT scans, particularly among children. However, to date, there are few data available describing the magnitude of pediatric CT utilization.

Objective

The aim of the study was to explore patterns of CT use in pediatric patients, with respect to time, use of multiple scans, body regions imaged, and medical diagnoses.

Materials and methods

Records of 22,223 scans performed on 18,075 people aged ≤18 years over the period 1999–2003, including diagnoses recorded within 21 days after the examination, were obtained from a large Israeli Health Maintenance Organization (1,600,000 members).

Results

The highest annual CT examination rate (per 1,000) was recorded in 2001 (10.1) compared to 7.0 and 6.3 in 1999 and 2003, respectively. The lowest rate (three scans per 1,000) was found for 3-year-old children, with increasing rates with age. The head was the most frequently scanned region, both in young children (78%) and adolescents (39%). Symptoms of ill-defined conditions and injuries were documented in 22% and 10% of all scans, respectively.

Conclusions

Although the results suggest that children comprise only 3% of all patients undergoing CT, this important modality must be carefully used because of their increased radiosensitivity, higher effective radiation doses, and longer life expectancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shrimpton PC, Edyvean S (1998) CT scanner dosimetry. Br J Radiol 71:1–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hart D, Wall BF (2004) UK population dose from medical X-ray examinations. Eur J Radiol 50:285–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner DJ (2002) Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative discussion. Pediatr Radiol 32:228–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176:289–296

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Linton OW, Mettler FA Jr; National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2003) National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. AJR 181:321–329

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ron E (2003) Cancer risks from medical radiation. Health Phys 85:47–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brasch RC, Boyd DP, Gooding CA (1978) Computed tomographic scanning in children: comparison of radiation dose and resolving power of commercial CT scanners. AJR 131:95–101

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. UNSCEAR (2000) Sources and effects of ionising radiation. Annex D: medical radiation exposures. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, New York

  9. World Health Organisation (1975) International classification of diseases (ICD), 9th revision. WHO, Geneva

  10. Mettler F, Wiest P, Locken J, et al (2000) CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot 20:353–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sacchetti A, Carraccio C, Giardino A, et al (2005) Sedation for pediatric CT scanning: is radiology becoming a drug-free zone? Pediatr Emerg Care 21:295–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Frush D, Donnelly L, Rosen N (2003) Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 112:951–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sikron F, Giveon A, Aharonson-Daniel L, et al (2004) My home is my castle! Or is it? Hospitalizations following home injury in Israel, 1997–2001. Isr Med Assoc J 6:332–335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Luxenburg O, Vaknin S, Pollack G, et al (2003) Utilization patterns of CT and MRI in Israel. Harefuah 142:810–814

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF (2001) Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR 176:297–301

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, et al (2001) Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large children's hospital. AJR 176:303–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaste SC, Young CW, Holmes TP, et al (1997) Effect of helical CT on the frequency of sedation in pediatric patients. AJR 168:1001–1003

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pappas JN, Donnelly LF, Frush DP (2000) Reduced frequency of sedation of young children with multisection helical CT. Radiology 215:897–899

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Huda W (2002) Dose and image quality in CT. Pediatr Radiol 32:709–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, et al (2005) Doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK – 2003 review. Health Protection Agency, Didcot, UK. Available at http://www.hpa.org.uk/radiation/publications/w_series_reports/2005/nrpb_w67.htm. Cited 6 Dec 2005

  21. Huda W, Atherton JV, Ware DE, et al (1997) An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients. Radiology 203:417–422

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hollingsworth C, Frush DP, Cross M, et al (2003) Helical CT of the body: a survey of techniques used for pediatric patients. AJR 180:401–406

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Frush DP (2002) Pediatric CT: practical approach to diminish the radiation dose. Pediatr Radiol 32:714–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, et al (2004) Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 231:393–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. National Cancer Institute (2002) Radiation and pediatric computed tomography: a guide for health care providers. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

  26. National Academies of Sciences (2005) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. http://www.nap.edu/books/030909156X/html

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Chodick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chodick, G., Ronckers, C., Ron, E. et al. The utilization of pediatric computed tomography in a large Israeli Health Maintenance Organization. Pediatr Radiol 36, 485–490 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-005-0091-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-005-0091-0

Keywords

Navigation