Skip to main content
Log in

Isolation of two lactobacilli, producers of two new bacteriocin-like substances (BLS) for potential food-preservative use

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fermentation of meat by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) is a traditional practice in many countries of Europe. LAB are already used for probiotic use and/or their bacteriocins can be used as a food preservative. 21 LABs were isolated from ham samples and identified by PCR; in particular, L. plantarum-GS16 and L. paraplantarum-GS54 were identified as the best bacteriocin-like substance (BLS) producers, active against spoilage and pathogenic bacteria, Gram negative included. In these strains, the presence of virulence factors, antibiotic and gastrointestinal resistance was investigated. The kinetics of growth and the BLS biosynthesis was also evaluated at different pH values. Finally, both bacteriocin substances were partially characterized and included in the IIa class of Klaenhammer; as a potential application, both BLSs can be successfully used as food preservatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Myrto-Panagiota Zacharof (2015) In: Ravishankar Rai V (ed) Strategies for advantageous antimicrobial activity by Bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria: higher yield, enhanced activity and successful application in foods. Advances in Food Biotechnology. Wiley, pp 511–526

  2. Cleeveland J, Mantiville TJ, Ness IF, Chiknids ML (2001) Bacteriocins: safe antimicrobials for food preservation. Int J Food Microbiol 71:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vermeiren L, Devlieghere F, Debevere J (2004) Evaluation of meat born lactic acid bacteria as protective cultures for the biopreservation of cooked meat products. Int J Food Microbiol 1:149–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cano-Garrido O, Seras-Franzoso J, Garcia-Fruitós E (2015) Lactic acid bacteria: reviewing the potential of a promising delivery live vector for biomedical purposes. Microb Cell Fact 14:137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deegan LH, Cotter PD, Hill C, Ross P (2006) Bacteriocins: biological tools for bio-preservation and shelf-life extension. Int Dairy J 16:1058–1071

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Madboly LA, Abdullah AK (2015) Potent antagonistic activity of Egyptian Lactobacillus plantarum against multiresistant and virulent food-associated pathogens. Front Microbiol 6:347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Russo P, Arena MP, Fiocco D, Capozzi V, Drider D, Spano G (2016) Lactobacillus plantarum with broad antifungal activity: a promising approach to increase safety and shelf-life of cereal-based products. Int J Food Microbiol. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.04.027

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saraoui T, Leroi F, Björkroth J, Pilet MF (2016) Lactococcus piscium: a psychotrophic lactic acid bacterium with bioprotective or spoilage activity in food - a review. J Appl Microbiol. doi:10.1111/jam.13179

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cotter P, Hill C, Ross RP (2006) What’s in a name? Class distinction for bacteriocins. Nat Rev Microbiol. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1273-c1

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zilelidou E, Manthou E, Skandamis P (2016) Growth differences and competition between Listeria monocytogenes strains determine their predominance on ham slices and lead to bias during selective enrichment with the ISO protocol. Int J Food Microbiol 235:60–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abadias M, Usall J, Anguera M, Solsona C, Viñas I (2008) Microbiological quality of fresh, minimally-processed fruit and vegetables, and sprouts from retail establishments. Int J Food Microbiol 123:121–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Abbasiliasi S, Tan JS, Ibrahim TA, Ramanan RN, Vakhshiteh F, Mustafa S, Ling TC, Rahim RA, Ariff AB (2012) Isolation of Pediococcus acidilactici Kp10 with ability to secrete bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance from milk products for applications in food industry. BMC Microbiol 12:260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tomé E, Gibbs PA, Teixeira PC (2008) Growth control of Listeria innocua 2030c on vacuum-packaged cold-smoked salmon by lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 121:285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arvanitoyannis IS, Stratakos AC (2012) Application of modified atmosphere packaging and active/smart technologies to red meat and poultry: a review. Food Bioprocess Technol 5:1423–1446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalschne DL, Womer R, Mattana A, Pereira Sarmento CM, Colla LM, Colla E (2015) Characterization of the spoilage lactic acid bacteria in “sliced vacuum-packed cooked ham”. Braz J Microbiol 46:173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bredholt S, Nesbakken T, Holck A (2001) Industrial application of an antilisterial strain of Lactobacillus sakei as a protective culture and its effect on the sensory acceptability of cooked, sliced, vacuum-packaged meats. Int J Food Microbiol 66:191–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Metaxopoulos J, Mataragas M, Drosinos EH (2002) Microbial interaction in cooked cured meat products under vacuum or modified atmosphere at 4 °C. J Appl Microbiol 93:363–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Alves VF, Martinez RC, Lavrador MA, De Martinis EC (2006) Antilisterial activity of lactic acid bacteria inoculated on cooked ham. Meat Sci 74:623–627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rossi M, Altomare L, Gonzàlez Vara y Rodriguez A, Brigidi P, Matteuzzi D (2000) Nucleotide sequence, expression and transcriptional analysis of the Bifidobacterium longum MB 219 lacZ gene. Arch Microbiol 174:74–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kékessy DA, Piguet JD (1970) New method for detecting bacteriocin production. J App Microbiol 20:282–283

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sabia C, Manicardi G, Messi P, de Niederhäusern S, Bondi M (2002) Enterocin 416K1, an antilisterial bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus casseliflavus IM 416K1 isolated from Italian sausages. Int J Food Microbiol 75:163–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Arslan S, Özkardes F (2007) Slime production and antibiotic susceptibility in staphylococci isolated from clinical samples. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 102:29–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. CLSI (2012) Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard—9th ed. CLSI document M07-A9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne

    Google Scholar 

  24. EFSA (2012) European Food Safety Authority. Guidance on the assessment of bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobials of human and veterinary importance. EFSA J 10:2740

    Google Scholar 

  25. Malinauskytė E, Ramanauskaitė J, Leskauskaitė D, Devold TG, Schüller RB, Vegarud GE (2014) Effect of human and simulated gastric juices on the digestion of whey proteins and carboxymethylcellulose-stabilised O/W emulsions. Food Chem 165:104–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hernandez D, Cardell E, Zarate V (2005) Antimicrobial activity of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Tenerife cheese: initial characterization of plantaricin TF711, a bacteriocin-like substance produced by Lactobacillus plantarum TF711. J App Microbiol 99:77–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. De Vuyst L, Moens F, Selak M, Rivière A, Leroy F (2014) Summer Meeting 2013: growth and physiology of bifidobacteria. J App Microbiol 116:477–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Iseppi R, Pilati F, Marini M, Toselli M, de Niederhäusern S, Guerrieri E, Messi P, Sabia C, Manicardi G, Anacarso I, Bondi M (2008) Anti-listerial activity of a polymeric film coated with hybrid coatings doped with Enterocin 416K1 for use as bioactive food packaging. Int J Food Microbiol 123:281–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Özogul F, Hamed I (2016) The importance of lactic acid bacteria for the prevention of bacterial growth and their biogenic amines formation: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. doi:10.1080/10408398.2016.1277972

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kaškonienė V, Stankevičius M, Bimbiraitė-Survilienė K, Naujokaitytė G, Šernienė L, Mulkytė K, Malakauskas M, Maruška A (2017) Current state of purification, isolation and analysis of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. doi:10.1007/s00253-017-8088-9

    Google Scholar 

  31. Anacarso I, Bassoli L, Sabia C, Iseppi R, Consò C (2015) Isolation and identification of Lactic Acid Bacteria from plants and other vegetable matrices and microbial recombination with Enterococcus spp. Am Res Thought 1:1503–1515

    Google Scholar 

  32. Patel A, Shah NP, Prajapati JB (2012) Antibiotic resistance profile of lactic acid bacteria and their implications in food chain. World J Dairy Food Sci 7:202–211

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou JS, Pillidge CJ, Gopal PK, Gill HS (2005) Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of new probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains. Int J Food Microbiol 98:211–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Argyri AA, Nisiotou AA, Mallouchos A, Panagou EZ, Tassou CC (2014) Performance of two potential probiotic Lactobacillus strains from the olive microbiota as starters in the fermentation of heat shocked green olives. Int J Food Microbiol 17:68–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Assefa S, Ahles K, Bigelow S, Curtis JT, Köhler GA (2015) Lactobacilli with probiotic potential in the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster). Gut Pathog 7:35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Asghar S, Arif M, Nawaz M, Muhammad K, Ali MA, Ahmad MD, Iqbal S, Anjum AA, Khan M, Nazir J (2016) Selection, characterisation and evaluation of potential probiotic Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry droppings. Benef Microbes 7:35–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ennahar S, Deschamps N, Richard J (2000) Natural variation in susceptibility of Listeria strains to class IIa bacteriocins. Curr Microbiol 41:1–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Immacolata Anacarso.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest has been declared.

Compliance with ethics requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anacarso, I., Gigli, L., Bondi, M. et al. Isolation of two lactobacilli, producers of two new bacteriocin-like substances (BLS) for potential food-preservative use. Eur Food Res Technol 243, 2127–2134 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-017-2913-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-017-2913-3

Keywords

Navigation