Abstract
Rationale
Behavioral economics can be used to evaluate the relative reinforcing effectiveness of drugs and the economic interaction between drugs, information which may help to explain patterns of polydrug abuse in humans.
Objectives
In phase 1, the reinforcing effectiveness of the opiate remifentanil and the stimulant cocaine was compared using a demand-curve analysis. In phase 2, the economic relation between these drugs was determined.
Materials and methods
Rhesus monkeys pressed levers according to fixed-ratio schedules for intravenous drug infusions. A demand-curve analysis was conducted (phase 1) in which drug consumption was measured as the response requirement, or price, was increased, and the rate at which consumption decreased with increases in price (demand elasticity) provided an index of the reinforcing effectiveness of each drug. Cocaine and remifentanil were then available concurrently (phase 2), and the price of one drug was increased (the manipulated-price alternative) while the price of the other drug was held constant (the fixed-price alternative). Consumption of the fixed-price alternative was measured as a function of increases in the price of the manipulated-price alternative, and demand for the manipulated-price alternative was assessed.
Results
The reinforcing effectiveness of cocaine and remifentanil did not significantly differ, and these drugs functioned as economic substitutes. As the price of the manipulated-price alternative increased, consumption of the fixed-price alternative increased. In addition, demand for the manipulated-price alternative became more elastic with the concurrent availability of the fixed-price alternative.
Conclusion
Polydrug use involving stimulants and opiates may occur because these drugs are highly substitutable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST, Hughes JR (1990) Behavioral economics of drug self-administration I. Functional equivalence of response requirement and drug dose. Life Sci 47:1501–1510
Bickel WK, Hughes JR, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST, Rizzuto P (1992) Behavioral economics of drug self-administration IV. The effects of response requirement on the consumption of and interaction between concurrently available coffee and cigarettes. Psychopharmacology 107:211–216
Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST (1993) Behavioral economics: a novel experimental approach to the study of drug dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend 33:173–192
Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST (1995) The behavioral economics of concurrent drug reinforcers: a review and reanalysis of drug self-administration research. Psychopharmacology 118:250–259
Campbell UC, Carroll ME (2000) Reduction of drug self-administration by an alternative non-drug reinforcer in rhesus monkeys: magnitude and temporal effects. Psychopharmacology 147:418–425
Comer SD, Lac ST, Wyvell CL, Carroll ME (1996) Combined effects of buprenorphine and a nondrug alternative reinforcer on i.v. cocaine self-administration in rats maintained under FR schedules. Psychopharmacology 125:355–360
Comer SD, Collins ED, Wilson ST, Donovan MR, Foltin RW, Fischman MW (1998) Effects of an alternative reinforcer on intravenous heroin self-administration by humans. Eur J Pharmacol 345:13–26
Duvauchelle CL, Sapoznik T, Kornetsky C (1998) The synergistic effects of combining cocaine and heroin (‘Speedball’) using a progressive-ratio schedule of drug reinforcement. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 61:297–302
Higgins ST, Bickel WK, Hughes JR (1994) Influence of an alternative reinforcer on human cocaine self-administration. Life Sci 55:179–187
Hursh SR (1984) Behavioral economics. J Exp Anal Behav 42:435–452
Hursh R (2000) Behavioral economic concepts and methods for studying health behavior. In: Bickel WK and Vuchinich RE (eds) Reframing health behavior change with behavioral economics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp27–60
Hursh SR, Winger G (1995) Normalized demand for drugs and other reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav 64:373–384
Johnson MW, Bickel WK, Kirshenbaum AP (2004) Substitutes for tobacco smoking: a behavioral economic analysis of nicotine gum, denicotinized cigarettes, and nicotine-containing cigarettes. Drug Alcohol Depend 74:253–264
Leri F, Bruneau J, Stewart J (2003) Understanding polydrug use: review of heroin and cocaine co-use. Addiction 98:7–22
Mattox AJ, Thompson SS, Carroll ME (1997) Smoked heroin and cocaine base (speedball) combinations in rhesus monkeys. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 5:113–118
Mello NK, Negus SS, Lukas SE, Mendelson JH, Sholar JW, Drieze J (1995) A primate model of polydrug abuse: cocaine and heroin combinations. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 274:1325–1337
Nader MA, Woolverton WL (1992) Choice between cocaine and food by rhesus monkeys: effects of conditions of food availability. Behav Pharmacol 3:635–638
National Research Council (1996) Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Academy, Washington DC
Petry NM, Bickel WK (1998) Polydrug abuse in heroin addicts: a behavioral economic analysis. Addiction 93:321–335
Petry NM, Bickel WK (1999) Buprenorphine dose self-selection: effects of an alternative reinforcer, behavioral economic analysis of demand, and examination of subjective drug effects. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 7:38–48
Ranaldi R, Munn E (1998) Polydrug self-administration in rats: cocaine-heroin is more rewarding than cocaine alone. Neuroreport 9:2463–2466
Ranaldi R, Wise RA (2000) Intravenous self-administration of methamphetamine-heroin (speedball) combinations under a progressive-ratio schedule of reinforcement in rats. Neuroreport 11:2621–2623
Rodefer JS, Mattox AJ, Thompson SS, Carroll ME (1997) Effects of buprenorphine and an alternative nondrug reinforcer, alone and in combination, on smoked cocaine self-administration in monkeys. Drug Alcohol Depend 45:21–29
Rowlett JK, Woolverton WL (1997) Self-administration of cocaine and heroin combinations by rhesus monkeys responding under a progressive-ratio schedule. Psychopharmacology 133:363–371
Rowlett JK, Wilcox KM, Woolverton WL (1998) Self-administration of cocaine-heroin combinations by rhesus monkeys: antagonism by naltrexone. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 286:61–69
Rowlett JK, Rodefer JS, Spealman RD (2005) Self-administration of cocaine-opioid combinations by rhesus monkeys: evaluation of the role of μ receptor efficacy using labor supply analysis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 312:1289–1297
Spiga R, Martinetti MP, Meisch RA, Cowan K, Hursh S (2005) Methadone and nicotine self-administration in humans: a behavioral economic analysis. Psychopharmacology 178:223–231
Wade-Galuska T, Galuska C, Winger G, Woods JH (2007) Aspartame demand in rhesus monkeys: effects of volume and concentration manipulations. Behav Processes 74:71–78
Ward SJ, Morgan D, Roberts DC (2005) Comparison of the reinforcing effects of cocaine and cocaine/heroin combinations under progressive ratio and choice schedules in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 30:286–295
Winger G, Galuska CM, Hursh SR, Woods JH (2006) Relative reinforcing effects of cocaine, remifentanil, and their combination in rhesus monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 318:223–229
Acknowledgments
We thank Amy Hall and Graham Flory for technical assistance and Chad Galuska for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by United States Public Health Service Grant DA 015449 and Training Grant DA 007268.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wade-Galuska, T., Winger, G. & Woods, J.H. A behavioral economic analysis of cocaine and remifentanil self-administration in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology 194, 563–572 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-007-0858-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-007-0858-0