Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic Stress Analysis of Vehicle Frame Using a Nonlinear Finite Element Method

  • Published:
KSME International Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Structural integrity of either a passenger car or a light truck is one of the basic requirements for a full vehicle engineering and development program. The results of the vehicle product performance are measured in terms of durability, noise/vibration/harshness (NVH), crashworthiness and passenger safety. The level of performance of a vehicle directly affects the marketability, profitability and, most importantly, the future of the automobile manufacturer. In this study, we used the Virtual Proving Ground (VPG) approach for obtaining the dynamic stress or strain history and distribution. The VPG uses a nonlinear, dynamic, finite element code (LS-DYNA) which expands the application boundary outside classic linear, static assumptions. The VPG approach also uses realistic boundary conditions of tire/road surface interactions. To verify the predicted dynamic stress and fatigue critical region, a single bump run test, road load simulation, and field test have been performed. The prediction results were compared with experimental results, and the feasibility of the integrated life prediction methodology was verified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baek, W. K., 1992, “A Study on Fatigue Life Prediction of Suspension Systems Using CAE,” KSAE Paper No. 923875.

  • DADS flex manual, CADSI, P.O. Box 203, Oakdale, Iowa 52319.

  • DADS users manual. CADSI. P.O. Box 203. Oakdale. Iowa 52319.

  • Han, D. H., et al., 2000, “Development and Comparative Study on Tire Models in the Au-toDyn7 Program,”KSME International Journal.

  • Kuo, E. Y. and Kelkar, S. G., 1995, “Vehicle Body Structure Durability Analysis,” SAE Paper No. 951096.

  • Papadrakakis, M., 1981, “A Method for the Automated Evaluation of the Dynamic Relaxation Parameter,” Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 25, pgs. 35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S. H. and Yoo, W. S., 2000, “Comparative Study of Dynamic Analysis Techniques in Vehicle Simulation,”KSME International Journal.

  • Zhang, Y. and Tang, A., 1996, “The CAE Revolution and the Development of the Virtual Proving Ground Approach,” The 4th International LS-DYNA Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Sept.

  • Zhang, Y., et al., 1997, “Validation of a FEA Tire Model for Vehicle Dynamic Analysis and Full Vehicle Real Time Proving Ground Simulations,” SAE Paper No. 971100.

  • eta/VPG application manual, ETA. 1133 E. Maple Rd., suite 200 Troy. MI 48083 USA.

  • eta/VPG users processor manual, ETA, 1133 E. Maple Rd., suite 200 Troy, MI 48083 USA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gyu Ha Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, G.H., Cho, K.Z., Chyun, I.B. et al. Dynamic Stress Analysis of Vehicle Frame Using a Nonlinear Finite Element Method. KSME International Journal 17, 1450–1457 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982324

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982324

Key Words

Navigation