Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape patterns

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A variety of ecological questions now require the study of large regions and the understanding of spatial heterogeneity. Methods for spatial-temporal analyses are becoming increasingly important for ecological studies. A grid cell based spatial analysis program (SPAN) is described and results of landscape pattern analysis using SPAN are presentedd. Several ecological topics in which geographic information systems (GIS) can play an important role (landscape pattern analysis, neutral models of pattern and process, and extrapolation across spatial scales) are reviewed. To study the relationship between observed landscape patterns and ecological processes, a neutral model approach is recommended. For example, the expected pattern (i.e., neutral model) of the spread of disturbance across a landscape can be generated and then tested using actual landscape data that are stored in a GIS. Observed spatial or temporal patterns in ecological data may also be influenced by scale. Creating a spatial data base frequently requires integrating data at different scales. Spatial is shown to influence landscape pattern analyses, but extrapolation of data across spatial scales may be possible if the grain and extent of the data are specified. The continued development and testing of new methods for spatial-temporal analysis will contribute to a general understanding of landscape dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Addicott, J.F., Aho, J.M., Antolin, M.F., Padilla, D.K., Richardson, J.S. and Soluk, D.A. 1987. Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49: 340–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T.F.H. and Starr, T.B. 1992. Hierarchy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T.F.H., O’Neill, R.V. and Hoekstra, T.W. 1987. Interlevel relations in ecological research and management: some working principles from hierarchy theory. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 14: 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R.L. and Sharpe, D.M., eds. 1981. Forest island dynamics in man-dominated landscapes, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P.A. 1986. Principles of geographic information systems for land resources assessment. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H. 1976. Community structure: a neutral model analysis. Ecol. Monogr. 46: 327–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H. 1988. Theory and models in ecology: a different perspective. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 69: 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delcourt, H.R., Delcourt, P.A. and Webb, T., III. 1983. Dynamic plant ecology: The spectrum of vegetation change in space and time. Quaternary Science Review 1: 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L. and Paloheimo, J. 1988. Effect of spatial arrangement of habitat patches on local population size. Ecology 69: 468–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. 1981. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. BioScience 31: 733–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T. and Gordon, M. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J.F. and Forman, R.T.T. 1987. Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: ecological consequences and principles. Landscape Ecology 1: 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R.H., Milne, B.T., Turner, M.G. and O’Neill, R.V. 1987. Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1: 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getis, A. and Franklin, J. 1987. Second-order neighborhood analysis of mapped point patterns. Ecology

  • Henderson-Sellers, A., Wilson, M.F. and Thomas, G. 1985. The effect of spatial resolution on archives of land cover type. Climatic Change 7: 391–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Sugihara, G., O’Neill, R.V. and Coleman, P.R. 1987. Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos 48: 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B.B. 1988. The fractal geometry of nature. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meentemeyer, V. and Box, E.O. 1987. Scale effects in landscape studies.In: Landscape heterogeneity and disturbance. pp. 15–34. Edited by M.G. Turner. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, B.T. 1988. Measuring the fractal dimension of landscapes. Appl. Math. Comp. 27: 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D.W. 1987. Ecological scale and habitat use. Ecology 68: 362–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R.V., DeAngelis, D.L., Waide, J.B. and Allen, T.F.H. 1986. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R.V., Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Sugihara, G., Jackson, B., DeAngelis, D.L., Milne, B.T., Turner, M.G., Zygmunt, B., Christensen, S.W., Dale, V.H. and Graham, R.L. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1: 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orbach, R. 1986. Dynamics of fractal networks. Science 231: 814–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmeirim, J.M. 1988. Automatic mapping of avian species habitat using satellite imagery. Oikos 52: 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterjohn, W.T. and Correll, D.L. 1984. Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology 65: 1466–1475.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romme, W. and Knight, D.H. 1982. Landscape diversity: the concept applied to Yellowstone Park. BioScience 32: 664–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryszkowski, L. and Kedziora, A. 1987. Impact of agricultural landscape structure on energy flow and water cycling. Landscape Ecology 1: 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala, O.E., Parton, W.J., Joyce, L.A. and Lauenroth, W.K. 1988. Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology 69: 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. 1982. User’s guide: statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonewald-Cox, C. 1988. Boundaries in the protection of nature reserves. BioScience 38: 480–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senft, R.L., Coughenour, M.B., Bailey, D.W., Rittenhouse, L.R., Sala, O.E., and Swift, D.M. 1987. Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies. BioScience 37: 789–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W. 1962. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, D.M., Guntenspergen, G.R., Dunn, C.P., Leitner, L.A. and Stearns, F. 1987. Vegetation dynamics in a southern Wisconsin agricultural landscape.In: Landscape heterogeneity and disturbance. pp. 139–158. Edited by M.G. Turner. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, D. 1985. Introduction to percolation theory. Taylor and Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, F.J., Kratz, T.K., Caine, N. and Woodmansee, R.G. 1988. Landform effects on ecosystem patterns and processes. BioScience 38: 92–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G., ed. 1987a. Landscape heterogeneity and disturbance. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. 1987b. Land use changes and net primary production in the Georgia landscape: 1935 to 1982. Environ. Manage. 11: 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. 1987c. Spatial simulation of landscape changes in Georgia: a comparison of 3 transition models. Landscape Ecology 1: 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. 1988. A spatial simulation model of land use changes in Georgia. Appl. Math. Comp. 27: 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. and Ruscher, C.L. 1988. Changes in the spatial patterns of land use in Georgia. Landscape Ecology 1: 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G., Gardner, R.H., Dale, V.H., and O’Neill, R.V. 1988. Landscape pattern and the spread of disturbance.In: Proc. VIIIth Intl. Symp. Probs. Landsc. Ecol. Res., Vol. 1. pp. 373–382. Edited by M. Ruzicka, T. Hrnciarova, and L. Miklos. Institute of Experimental Biology and Ecology, CBES SAS, Bratislava, Czechoslovakia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G., Gardner, R.H., Dale, V.H. and O’Neill, R.V. 1989a. Predicting the spread of disturbance in heterogeneous landscapes. Oikos. 55: 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G., O’Neill, R.V., Gardner, R.H. and Milne, B.T. 1989b. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 3(3/4): 153–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, D.L., O’Neill, R.V. and Shugart, H.H. 1987. Landscape ecology. BioScience 37: 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dorp, D. and Opdam, P.F.M. 1987. Effects of patch size, isolation and regional abundance on forest bird communities. Landscape Ecology 1: 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, G.T. and Somerlot, W.J. 1985. A case study of woodland continuity and change in the American midwest. Biol. Conserv. 31: 265–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A., Crawford, C.S. and Gosz, J.R. 1985. Boundary dynamics: a conceptual framework for studying landscape ecosystems. Oikos 45: 421–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, M.G. Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape patterns. Landscape Ecol 4, 21–30 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02573948

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02573948

Keywords

Navigation