Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of cancer pain: a continuous challenge

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comprehensive assessment of cancer pain is the first and perhaps most important step toward pain relief. Yet, this assessment is frequently neglected in patients with cancer pain. This paper addresses five important aspects of cancer pain assessment: (1) What constitutes cancer pain assessment? (2) Why is it important? (3) Why is it frequently overlooked? (4) How can a cancer pain assessment program be implemented? (5) What changes can be expected as a result of routine cancer pain assessments? The fundamental assumptions underlying this discussion are that health-care providers must understand the intensity of their patients' pain and the likely etiology of that discomfort to direct an appropriate diagnostic evaluation and to initiate and evaluate the success of therapy. Instituting a routine pain assessment program need not be difficult. The recommended procedures must be simple, quantifiable, relevant, and recorded in the medical record. Routine pain assessment will promote a heightened sense of awareness and responsibility about cancer pain issues in health-care providers, improved communication between the patient and the healthcare provider, the development of cancer pain quality-assurance programs, and improved care for patients with cancer and pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bruera F, McMillan K, Hanson J, et al (1989) The Edmonton staging system for cancer pain: preliminary report. Pain 37:203–209

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chapman CR, Casey KL, Dubner R, et al (1985) Pain measurement: an overview. Pain 22:31

    Google Scholar 

  3. Choiniere M, Melzack R, Girard N, et al (1990) Comparisons between patients' and nurses' assessment of pain and medication efficacy in severe burn injuries. Pain 40:143–152

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cleeland CS (1990) Assessment of pain in cancer. In: Foley KM, Bonica JJ, Ventafridda V (eds) Advances in pain research and therapy, vol 16. Raven Press, New York, pp 47–55

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fishman B, Pasternak S, Wallenstein S, et al (1987) The Memorial pain assessment card: a valid instrument for the evaluation of cancer pain. Cancer 60:1151–1158

    Google Scholar 

  6. Foley JM (1979) Pain syndromes in patients with cancer. In: Bonica JJ, Ventafridd V (eds) Advances in pain research and therapy, vol 2. Raven Press, New York, pp 59–75

    Google Scholar 

  7. Graham C, Bond SS, Gerkovich MM, et al (1980) Use of the MCGill pain questionnaire in the assessment of cancer pain: replicability and consistency. Pain 8:377–387

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grossman SA (1993) Undertreatment of cancer pain: barriers and remedies. Support Care Cancer 1:74–78

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grossman SA, Weissman DE, Wang H, et al (1990) Early diagnosis of spinal epidural metastases using out-patient computed tomographic myelography. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 26:495–499

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grossman SA, Sheidler VR, Sweden K, et al (1991) Correlation of patient and caregiver ratings of cancer pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 6:53–57

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grossman SA, Sheidler VR, McGuire DB, et al (1992) A comparison of the Hopkins Pain Rating Instrument with standard visual analogue and verbal descriptor scales in patients with cancer pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 7:196–203

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kremer EF, Atkinson JH, Ignelzi RJ (1982) Pain measurement: affective dimensional measure of the McGill pain questionnaire with a cancer pain population. Pain 12:153–163

    Google Scholar 

  13. Max M (1991) American Pain Society quality assurance standards for relief of acute pain and cancer pain. In: Bond MR, Charlton JE, Woolf CJ (eds) Proceedings of the VI World Congress on Pain. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 185–189

    Google Scholar 

  14. Melzack R (1975) The McGill pain questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1:277–299

    Google Scholar 

  15. O'Brien J, Francis A (1988) The use of next-of-kin to estimate pain in cancer patients. Pain 35:171–178

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stjernsward J, Teoh N (1990) The scope of the cancer pain problem. Adv Pain Res Ther 16:7–12

    Google Scholar 

  17. Twycross RG (1978) Relief of pain. In: Sunders CM (ed) The management of terminal disease. Chicago Yearbook Publishers, Chicago, p 65

    Google Scholar 

  18. Twycross RG (1984) Incidence of pain. Clin Oncol 3:5

    Google Scholar 

  19. Williams CR (1988) Toward a set of reliable and valid measures for chronic pain assessment and outcome research. Pain 35:239–251

    Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organization (1990) Cancer pain relief and palliative care. WHO Tech Rep Ser 804:23–41

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, 600 North Wolfe Street, 21287, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Stuart A. Grossman

Authors
  1. Stuart A. Grossman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grossman, S.A. Assessment of cancer pain: a continuous challenge. Support Care Cancer 2, 105–110 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00572091

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00572091

Key words

Search

Navigation